Loading...
PC 66-20RESOLUTION N0. P,Ce 66-20 A RESOLi.ffION OF THE CITY PLANNING COi'u1MISSION OF THE CIi'Y OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE PJO. 1814 BE GRANTED WNEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance from ROBERT WETZLER, Box 2216, Anaheim, California, Owner; FEDERAL SIGN COtv1PANY, 3036 South Oak Street, Santa Ana, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orar~ge, State of California, described as the North half of the West half of the North half of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 24, in Township 4 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as shown on ~ map thereof re- corded in book 51, page 7, et seqo, Miscellaieous Maps, records of said Orange County; EXCEPTIIJG TNEREFROM tlie Easterly 406 feet thereof ; and WFIEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on July 13, 1966, at 2:00 o'clock P~M., notice of said public hearing having been duly yiven as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of tt~e A~aheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18~68, to hear and consider evidence for and agairst said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection theretivith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said I~earing, does find and determine the following facts: i~ That the peiitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim iuiunicipal Code to permit constiuction of an additional roof sign on subiect property: SHCTIOtd 18062„090(U) - LOCATI01~ Code would require a distance of 70 feet from the property line - 60 feet proposeda Roof sign ,^ot permitted within 300 feet oi another roof sign - proposed to be located within 15 - 20 `eet of an existin9 roof sign. HEIGHT 25 foot height permitted within 300 feet of a residential structure - 41~b foot height proposed~ 2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property tliat do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone~ 3~ That the requested variance is necessary for the pieser~ation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question. 4a That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public weifare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in whic~: the property is locatedo 5o Tliat the petitioner stipulated to removal of the existing roof signso 5o That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition. V1-G ~ ~ - 1 - 3 ~. _.~. ~ t ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mahtim City Plenning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition Eor Vadonce, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessory prerequisite to the pro- posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. 1~ That all existing signs on the property wiih an appraised value of $200000 or less shall be removed as required by the Sign Ordinance of the City of Anaheim; such re- moval to take place prior to final building inspection, as stipulated by the petitioner. 2. That subject property shall be developed substant~ally in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exnibit Noso 1 and 2. ~ ',I'~.~alla~' (~ ;'• ; ~ ~ ! ~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ia sig~ed and epproved by me this 2 h day of July, 1966. ~-Lt'~.-G/ ~ AIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIN COMMISSION ATTEST: - ~~i2 " ' - ~~i`~P~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIVG COMMISSYON STATE OF CALI.FORNIA ) COUNTY OF OR.4NGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Ann Krebs~ Secretery of the City Plenning Commission ot the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify that the fore- going resolution wes passed end odopted at e meeting of the Clty Planning Commission ot the City of Anaheim, held on Ji~ly 1R, 1966, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the Eollowing vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: AiLRED, GAUER, HERBST, MUNGALL, R06VLAND, CAMP. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOIJE. , " ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PERRY. IN WITNESS W}{EREOF, i have hereunto set my hend this 2Rth day of July, 1966. RESOLUTION N0. 66-20 V2-G R ~ __~~'~W SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION _y. € I ~ r ! ~' i. ~ 4 . .~,~. ' - ;.~; .._. ,. - :.R.^,. . v!:,:i ~