PC 66-3RE50LUTION NO. p° ~° 66-3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF AP:AHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1R06 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Cit~~ Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Varience from
FOSS D~ h1UR0, 207:~ South Daisy, Santa Ana, Caiifornia, Owner; STANLEY Lo ROSEN9 ~iR West
Lir,,:oin9 Anaheim, Cal`forniay Aqent of certain real property situated in the City o:' Anahei~e.
County of Orangev State of California, described as Lot 121 of Tx•act AJoe 22G5, in the Cour.ty
of O:ange, as per map recorded in book 64 pages 33, 34 and 35 of hliscellaneous h~apsY ir 'ne
ofrice of the ~our.ty recorder of said county
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City H~ll in the City of Anaheim on
July ci9 ;96b9 at 2:00 o'clock P,M., notice of said public hAaring heving been duly given as required by
law and in accordence with the provis?ons ol'the An~heim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for
and against seid proposed varience and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in con~ection therewith;
ond
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered as said hearing, does find and detertnine the fo!lowing
facts:
1. Thet the petitioner requests e r~rience from the P,naheim Municipal Code: Sectlon' IR,?4.Oi0 - pa:~~~; tt.ed
Lses - to utilize an eaistir,; single far„ily residence as a medica. o.`;ice on s~.~bject prope:ty..
2. That tnere are no eYceptiona; or extraord:nary circu^~stances or cor.ditio~s applic~u;e
t.o the propert} involved or to the intended use cf t;~z ,~roper±y that do not app:y qe~;er~l:~- ~o
the propei•ty or ;:lass of use in ;he same ~:~icinity and zone.
:so That the requested ~~ariance is not necessary for tne oreservation an~; en~oyi~er,t o}'
a substantial proper?y :iyht possessed by oti:e: property in the san;e vicinity ,.nd ~one, an:i
denied to the prooerty in questior~
4, Ths; the requested variance wi71 be materially detrimental to `_he pubi:c vrel;'a:e or
injurinus to the p:operty or impruvements in such vicinity and zone in :•rnici: the nropert.y ;s
lc~atea.
5~ That the petitioner requesls a v~ria:ice for a comr:ercial use tvhich shoo:o be corsid~~e-i
under reclassification proceedinys ard the special circumstances, sucn as si-ey slope, ±~,;;c•-.; ,,,•,;,
location or su:roundings, etc. inherent in the prope'rty ~,vould have to be snotvn ~~rhich deorive
subject oroperty o}' privileyes enjoyed by ether properties in the ~~icinity and under iaenti;:a:
zore c,assifiraticr,y before the Planning Comrnission would be empe~a~reo to grant a,:arisr~ce..
h~ Tnat the commercial use proposed for subject property throuyh the qsanting o+' a
~~ariance wouid precipitate many other similar reGuests for the convErs~on of .esidenres for
rcinmer; iaal purposes, thus defeating the intent of tne zoning code w'r.ict~ proviries for ti~e
orderiy develop!vent ar.d co;nmercial use of properties a,i~acert to residential d^eas„
7~ That two lette:s of conditio~al opposition regarding inadequate ccreenino cf `.he
cemmer~iai use were received ;rom adjacent property ownerso
~ ; V 1-D.
_ __ ~ _
~x
~
-1-
, ~
~ ~
.-- .:,
, ' .'~
NOW, TIiEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Variance on the basis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOGUTION is signed and epproved by me this :~'th d3y o~ July, '.900..
~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAPININ ~OMMISSION
O~
ATTEST:
~l ~='~ ~~-
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COh1MISSION
STATE OF CALiFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
C1TY OF ANAHEIM )
:,; An~~ Krebs, Secretary of !he City Planning Commission o( the City o( Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
Roing resolution was pessed and edopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission o(the City o( Anaheim, held on
J..1 y 6,, 19609 at 2:00 o'clock P.h~,~ by the foilowing vote of the members tbereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ~~uer. H?rbst., Munaal;, Perryy Rox~iand.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: t~an~' -
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: A-'~; edv Carnp~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~-~, d:iy ef J~'.y., iQ~~.,
~L , ' C ~"~ n ~, ~.__ . .
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. p^C^ 3
V2-D
_2.
~
-- . .,~_
r
t _ n