PC 66-32RESOLUTION NO. ~66•-32
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66•-67-5 HE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclessifice-
tionfrom MURRAY GREENWOOD, ROBERT E. SINGER, AIJD EDWIN C. ILIFF, 3505 Long Beach Boulevard,
Suite "H", Long Beach, California, Owners; P.OBERT E. SINGER, 338 East 3rd Stre?t, Long
Beach, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of California, described as the Southwesterly 7 acres of th? Northwesterly
20 acres of Lot 10 of "Anaheim Extensi.on", as surveyed by William Hamel, December 11, 1868
and filed for record in the Office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, California,
a copy thereof being or, file in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California,
in book 3, page 163, et seq~ of "Los Angeles County Maps'; EXCEPTING THEREFROM the North-
westerly 230 feet thereof; ALSO EXCEPTINu THEREFROM the interest in the Southeasterly 40
feet of said land which was granted for street and utility purposes to the City of Anahei:n,
a municipal corporation by deed recorded Ociober 13, 1954 in book 2841, page 188, Official
Records; The above areas and u?stances are calculated to the centerlines uf streets adjacent
to Lo~ 10 as shown on said map of the "Anahe-m Ext?nsion"
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Comrt~ission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
August 1, 1966, at 2:00 o'clock P.M, notice oE seid public hearing heving been duly given es required by
law end in accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipa] Code, Chapter 18.72, to heer ~nd consider evidence
for and ageinst said proposed reclessificetion end to investigete and meke findings and recommendetions in connection
therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself end in its behelf, and
after due rnnsideration of ell evidence end reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the folSowing facts:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes e reclassificetion of the above described property from the R-A, AGRICULl'URAL,
ZONE ~o the R•-1, ONE•-FAMILY ReSTDEfJTIAL, ZONE to subdivide subject property into 22 R-1 iots,
2. That the propesed reclassification is in conformance with the Goneral P;an.
3. That the proposed reclassificetion of subject property is necessary end/or desirebie for the orderly end pro-
per developnsent of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassificetion of subject property does properly relete to the zones and their permitted
uses locelly esteblished in close proximity to subject property end to the zones and their permitted uses generally esteb-
lished throughout the community.
5o That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the dedication
and improvement of abutting streets, through requirements established in approval of a
final tract map, in accordance with the C~rculationElement of the General Plan, due to
the anticipated increase in traffic which wili be generated by the intensification of
land use.
6. That no onP appeared in opposition to subject petition.
~
R-A -1-
` ~
I NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED th~t tlie Anahdm City planning Commissioa does hereby cecommend
to the City Council of the City of Meheim that eub)ect Petitlon for Reclasslficetion be eppioved and, by so doing,
that Title 1&Zonino of the MaheIm h(uaicipal Code be ammded to e:clude the above deacribed pioperty Erom the
Fi-A, Aqricultural, Zone, and to incorporate ss,id described property into the R-1, One~-
Family Residential, Zone, upon the following condition which is hereby fo~nd to be a
necessary prereauisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the
safety and general weifare of the citizens of ±he City of Anaheim:
1~ That a Final Tract Map of subject pr~perty be approved by the City Council
and recorded in the office oi the Orange County Record~ro
~;~~ i
~ ~ ;'
~` ;
~
;~. ~ _ ,.~!
;
.,`I _
.i
i
~I
_ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me thla lit day of A~.igust, 19660
! ~
~
HAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLA ING CO MISSION
~ ATTEST:
~
L--`" ~ ~
~~z ~~~; , ~.;~
~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMI5SEON
I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I I I~ Ann Krebs ~ Secretery of the City Plenning Commission at the City ot 1V~aheim, ao hereby certiEy thet the fore-
'( ~ , going resolution was passed and edopted at a meeting of the City Plenntng Commission o( the City oE Aneheim, held on
~ ! Auguet 1, 1966, et 2:00 o'dock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
I
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST, MUNGALL, ROWLAND, CAMP.
i
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: .ALLRED, GAUER, PERRY~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this llth day of August, 1966~
"t;
,~ ~ ~'L 'i' Z i i. ~ ~ ' G~•
~
* SECRETARY ANAHEIAI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
:. ~ ~ RESOLUTION NO. PC66-32
~. ? ~ R2-A
-2-
~ ~ i
~
~ 1 . ~~. . 1 -.--_.-,^.~,w..~.
~ ~ • -- • ~ • ' +a.:, • .~"i:.S~d'.
~`..
~