PC 66-46RESOLUTION NO. p~ 66-46
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF T CITY OF ANAHEIhf
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. ~~9 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Conditiortel
Use Pecmitfrom FRANCIS L. RICKER, 2A59 East Lincoln, Anaheim, California, Owner; HEINLY AND
RICKEL&, attorneys, 611 West ~ith Street, Sa~ta Ana, California, Agents of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California5 describad as Lot Nos.
27 and 2R of Tract No. 24q0.
~.~~
;I~ ~
~~
~
' ; end
~ WHEF.EAS, the Ctty Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
' August 15~ 1966, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having been dul
~ y given as required by
1 lew and in accordence with the provisions of the Maheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.64, to hear and consider evidence
for end against said proposed conditionel ase end to investigete and meke findings end recommendutions in connection
j' thetewith; and
~~ WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, end s!udy mede by itself and in its behelf,
:. i end after due consideration of ell evidence and repotts oEfered et seid hearing, does Eind and detertnine the following fects:
. i
~ 1. Thet the proposed use is propetly one fot which e Conditionel llae Permit is authorized by this Code, to wit:
Section 18.40.060(c) establi=h a service station within 75 reet of R-1 Zoned property
on subject prope•rty.
I 2. That the proposed use will adversely affect tne adjoining land uses and the growth
and developmer.t of the area in which it is proposed to be locateci.
3~ Tha± the proposed use for subject property would encourage strir commercial uses
, ~ of properties frontinq on Lincoln Avenue ana Sunkist Street.
4, That the propcsed use, due to its inherent noise, high intensity lighting, and traffic,
;,i •~ would be detrimental to the hi h
g qual~ty :esidential area in close proximity, and to the
~ peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizen~ of the City of Anaheim.
.. I ., 5. That •three persons appeared representing sixteen persons pre~ent in the Council
•! _ Chamber opposing subject pet.itiun, and that one person appeared in favor of subject petition.
Cl-D _l.
~~ ~ i
~ ~
~
i
~.
. ,
~ ~.:. _... __,.^ ,:..:.........,:.
,~ {-~~. _.... ,
F . ....'~. ~~ ~ • +w '~a+rr - .. , ._. ......, .
~-~ . .. . .... . . . ..~...,,. _ . ..,wy ''_1~:1.~_~~f
~
;~
,.
;~
;~
~'OW, "rf!EtcGC'nRE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anahelm City Plenning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition to,r Cuu~itian•ai Use Pertnit on the basis of the aforementioned findin~s.
TH~ 'CREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 25th day of August~ 1966.
~ C u-! ~% ~
/~-,--'~ Li
CH IRMAN ANAHEiM CITY PLANNI G COMMI SlON
ATTEST:
-~/ ~,~'.: (. '~ _~.~w i
~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMM[SSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AIVAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs ~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City o[ Anaheim, do hereby certify that the tore-
going resolution u.:s passed end adopted et a meeting of thc City Plenning Commission of the City o( qnaheim, held on
Au~ust 15~ 1965,, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by lhe following vote of the members thereo(:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Gauer, }ierbst, Mungall, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I ha:e hereunto set my hand this 25th day of August~ 1966.
RESOLUTION NO. 46
C2-D
% 'C^', ~~ ~~1~-(~.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-
~
~ ....3
5