PC 66-50PC 66-50
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VAi2IANCE NO. 1~2~ BE DENIED
~ ,
, *
I
~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did ~eceive a verified Petition for Varience from
SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS ~MPANY, P„ 0„ Box 2736y Terminal Annex, Los Anceles, Cal.ifornia, Owners;
DON P.. DAVIS, ,3p Pine Avrnue9 Long Beach, California, Agent of certain real property situated
in the City cf Anaheirn, County of Orange, State of California, described as t}:e Eost !:~1° of
t'.~e norcnzasc quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 26, Townsnip 4 South, Ranye 10 West,
partly in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de S~nta Ana and partly in the Rancho Sant°_ago de Santz
Ana, as said sectior, is shown on a Map :ecorded in Book 51, page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps,
recorr~s of Orange County, Caliiornia
; and
WNcREAS, the City Planning Commission did hotd a public heering et the City Hall in the City oE Anaheim on
%':.:gu=. `. '_59 1966y at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as required by
la~~• and in rccordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for
and against said proposed variance and to investiEat~, and make Eindings end recommendations in connection therewith;
and
NHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behelf,
and etter due considerotion of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find end determine the following
facts:
1. Thet the petitioner requests a veriance from the Anehelm Municipal Code: to permit erection of a free-
standing sign in the `,0•-;oot setback area of the M-i Zoner
Section i8o62~i00 B-•1 - 100 square foot maximum sign drea permitted - 300 square
foot sign area proposedo
2~ That. there a:e no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions apolicable
to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not aoply generally
~o the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone~
3~ That the requested var:ance is not necessary ;or the preservation and enjoyrr,ent of a
su~stantial propezty right possesaed by othez• property in tne same vicinity and zone, and
,ienied to the property in question~
4, That if subject petition were granted9 similar sign Uil~board requests would i~e
~nticipated throughout the industrial arens e° the City, which w;vlo nave a deleterious effect
both on the appearance of the ir.dustrial development now existinq, and on undeveloped
`_ndustriai propertieso
5< That adequate room is availabie on ~ubject property to pl~ce the p:oposed sican
behind tr~e required setback lin?a
6, That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition<
V 1-D
-1-
~
~,
f
1
: ~ ~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Planning Commission does pierebg denq su~jec(
Petition for Variance on the basis of the aEorementioned findings.
! THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed nnd approved by me this 25t i day of August.~ 196oa
~
1
I
I ' ~
~~ ~ _ ~,.,. /
HAIRMAN ANAHEIA; CITY PLAN:JI G COMMI ION
ATTEST:
~. ~ - ~/ ~! . /
j. i - L/~-~y'v?~~ -~/ J'~-L; G` ,---'
;; ~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
.. j
; I STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
, COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
~, .i CITY OF ANAHEIM )
i I~ Ann Krebs 9 Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
'.' j goiny resolution was passed and edopted at a meeting oE the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
1 August i5y 1966v at 2:00 o'clock p,M,~ by the foilowing vote of the members thereof:
~
'~ I AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano~ Gauer, Herbst, Mungall~ Rowland, Camp~
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
• ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred~
~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 25th day of Augusty 19b6o
-~
I ( i~ ~~L .:_~ /~Cc:~t-~ ~~ i
SECRETARY ANAHEIAd CITY PLANNING COh1M:SSION
• ~ RF,SULUTION NO. 50
V2-D
-z-
, !;
~,~,~
~
t,
~
; 4 --. .,.,. - ; ~..__~ __.--._..~.
~ - -- - , . - •:.s. , ;;,~,~,;~~_ _
~ ,
:s :