PC 66-61PC66-61
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. ~76BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anahelm did receive a verified Petition for Conditional
Use Pcrmitfrom REUBEN TUCKER~ ET AL, 7U1 North Helena Street, Anaheim, California, Owner; JACK
MILLER, 2545 East Chapman, Suite 1~, Fuilerton, California, Ayent of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orarge, State of California, described in Exhib:t
"A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set Forth in full
; and
WHEF.EAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on
Auqust 29~ 1966 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as required by
law and in accordance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.64, to hear and consider evidence
for and against said proposed conditional use and to investigate and make findings end recommendations in connection
therewith; and
Wf•~~EREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself and in its behalE,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following fects:
1. 'I'het the prop osed use is properly one for which e Conditional Use Pertnit is authorized by this Code, to wit:
Section 1f~,40~J60`g) to establish on-sale beer in conjunction witti the sale of food.
2. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoinina land uses and the orowth
and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
3. That the proposed beer bar would have a deleterious afFect on the area due to the
`act that children from the nearby schools and residences patronize the market shoppino area
for scnool supplies, snacks, and convenience goods.
4, That the small. neighborhood shopping facility already provides :or oFf-szle liquor
and the additicn of a be?r bar would not be an appropriate use of the prope:ty.
5a That the size and shape of the small neighborhood shopping center and the developmer.t
plans of the proposed beer bar are not adequate to ailow the development of the proposed use
'in a manner not detrimental to this particular area nor to the peace, hea:.th, safet}~, and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6o Petitions bearing 351 signatures were presented in opposition to subject petitiono
7, That twenty prople appeared in opposition to subject petition.
C1-D ; 1_
~
~..~~T .
~
~~~ ,
I ' ~ 70 ~=a e -~._ .. __ _ ____.___
. ~•~ ~ '
I I . O ~~ O r„~"'q'1~'23
• ~ ~S
r' ,
~ Title Insurance and Trust Com pan ~~~ ~`~ F~~~ e~
I Y %~ es
~ ~ ~ ORANO6 COUNTY OPPICt ~' ''J ~ CO ~
I ' ~ ' BOO ~'' ` ~ 2 ti
• NOqTH MA~N GTqtiCI' OANTA ANA ~~' ~~'~C 4~
~ I c'• /
1'MONt 047.ii8i `
Cj : `V
~ I L~CI~
~ L <<j~' :~ ~ /
~ i ~ July 18, 1966 ~
i ! . ' ; ; r IbiPORTANT
f I ~ -~ `' Whcn rc I m refcr to
i . 1,7illcr and ;•iac Donald ' ~Y s
~,_
. Attorncys At Law ; ~ OurNo. 438331-I~G
. ?545 L'ast Chapman Avenue
i ~ Fullcrton, California . YourNo.
_ ~ , Tucker, et al.
~ _,
.I
The following is a report of the titlc to the land describcd in your applicution for n Policy o( TiQe insuroncc, and is •
~ madc M•ithout linbility and without obligntion to issue such policy. In addition to any exceptiona ahown herein, and
:: ~ not clcared, thc policy, if issued, will contain copditions and stipulationa und also exceptions from ile coveragc as muy
' 1 be required Ly thc perticu~u,- form of policy issued.
~
i . Dated as of_.Tu7 1 S 1 ~i~~~- -
-~' ~-glifi_at 7:30 a.m.
; Vestcc: BILL GOCKA1AN TidcOf~ccr
~ RLUII~~v TUCI~~R, a married man,as to an undivided 3/8ths interest,
~~ hiILTO~ NEI~tA,ti', a married man, as to an undivided 3/8ths.interest
and JACK LAZAItUS, a married man, as;to an undivided l/4th interest.
j - •.
~ '.~ ' Exccptione:
__ _-- _. _. . .,:..--
Lot 152 of P.racti No. ].825, in the city of Anahsim, county o#'
~r~t'~;~, ~~ate o~ Ca' 'ornia, as per map recordc 1n tool; 62
_ na~e ~;3 of i•~i~ceZl4n~ous Alags, in L-he office of the county
r.:corder of tiaid counL-y.
~ j:_C~ _~ ;;n~;, bor~ion thcreof deseribed ~s f 11 ~~ B
~
~~~*
~ o o.~c. e~inning
~~ ~ne t•:e~t ~e~ir_u~ of tne north 11ne of eaid lo~ ~vhich is
s: ar:~z ~s ::or~h 3g° 51~ 00" i:'e~t 190.01 fee~, and rur.nir~;;
LY:ence So~:~h 8~° 51` 00" L~st along said lir.e 150.01 feet;
' ~he:zcc Sout.Z 0 32~ 3~" Eas~ parallel t~ri~h the poY~tion o~ the
c~~e~'c I! n~ oi ~~id loi, havin~ said be~in~ 100.00 fect; thence
i?orc'~ E39 51' 00° Uest g~r~llel rrith the nor'ch line of said lot
~a •(~ i G'C ~~ J710'1"O~ 02' ~ CSS ~ ~hence SOU'~11 ~~ 32 ~ 3~~~ $2aZ: 1}'rj. (1 '
i ect; ~her_ce Ncrth 89° 51' 00" [~lest parallel 4rith ~he r.ori:h
1~? ne o?' s~id l.ot' and i~'s t~res~erly extenaion 125. 00 i eet to the
t-re:;~erly lir.e of saj.d lo~, sa3d point of intersection bein^ on
w cu:ve ccncave northeas~erly 2nd h~vin~ a radius of 730.00
i ec~, a r~aial lirc at- ~~id point bearir~; ,~1or~h 85° 5i ~ 00"
~as~~ theiice~~nor~herly slor.;; said curve throu~h a central an~le
ofl 3~6' 37 ,a~n arc d1.sL-ance oi' 40'.00 fee~ to a line tangent;
~r_eizce ~?orch 0 32' 3~~~ l~lest alor; sa~d tan;;ent line, beir.~ the
~'~l:Jy li.r.e of saicl lot, 84.50 fec't ~o the bc~innin~; of a tar~;ent
cLrve cc_:cave ~outheasterly and zavin~ 2 radius o~ 15.00 feet;
~nence nor~l:e~~~erl;~ alon~ said curve tnrou~h a central ar~le ~
o_' g0` ~1' 30", ~:~ arc dis~~nce of 23.74 feet to t-he point of
be~=nnit~;, a~ conveyed to F, S. S. Land Corp. by deed recorded
Ju:~e 6, 19G3, in book 6577 p~e 216 0l ~fficial Records.
s
r.
f~l
' I
, i
I.
~ I
~i
`~
~ !~
~ ; .
~
1
. i ~ I
~' .
; r
i `
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Conditionel Use Permit on the besis of the eforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me.this ~ith day of September, 1966.
---~
-~c.~~,,,~
CHA RMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNI G COM SSION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ~}N EIM CI'I'Y PLANNING COMMISSION
Pro Tem
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, ~• Burgess, ~~e~~~ of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution wes pessed end adopted at e meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of pnaheim, held on
AuguSt 29~ 1966~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the iollowing vote of the members thereo(:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Mungall, Rowland, Camp.
N~7ES: COMMISSIONERS: Pdone.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Herbst.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand lhis Rth day of September~ 1966.
-__S~/~ ~~
SECRETARY A EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 61 Pro I'em
C2-D
-z-
~
~
f