PC 66-64RESOLUTION NO. ~66-64
A RESOLIJTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMIgS10N OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 182_3 HE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive e veri(ied Petition for Veriance
from ~0 FREED~dAN~ 201£i C~ldwater Canyon D~ Beverly Hills, California, 0„~ner; P.?.R. COMPANY,
923 Arlee Place, Anaheim, California, Agent of certein real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as the South ?_OO.UO feet of the East
192.00 feet of Section 34, Township 3 South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho San Juan Cajor: de
Santa Ana partly in the City of Fullerton and partly in the City of Anaheim, as per map recordec
.~ in Book 51 page 7 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the county recorder of said county
i,
'.
; and
~ WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hoid a public hearing et the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
on August ~9~ 1966 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given ae reQuired
by l~w and in eccordenoe with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipel C~de, Chepter 1R.68,to heerand consider
evidence Eor end e~ainst seid proposed verience and to investlgete and make (indings and recommendations in connec-
tion tht.,^~+ith; und
WHIiREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, end study mede by itself end in its behalf,
end after due consideretion of all evidence and :eports offered at seid heering, does find and determine the (ollowing
fac;s:
1. That the petitioner tequests e variance from the Aneheim Municipal Code:
SECTIpN 1R.62.090(B~ - one free-standi;ig sign permitted or~ suuject property- tvao
SECTION 1R.62 090(B-, `ree-standing signs proposed.
- ~- which requires that free-starding si9ns ue located no c;oser
.~ to a property line than a distar.ce equa: tu ~0;5 nf' t.he ~Nidt'r,
, of the parcel - to permit one free-standino sinr, two :eet 'ro~:;
the west property line.
_ 2. That there ere exceptionel or extraordinary circumstences or conditions applicable to the property involved
ur to the intended use of the property that do not epply generelly to the property or class of use in the seme vicinity
and zone.
3. Thet the requested variance is necessery for the preservation end enjoyment of a substantial property right
possessed by other property in the seme vicinity ~nd zone, and denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested verience will noi be ~neterially detrimental to the public wel(ere or injurious to the pmp~
eRy or improvements in such vicinity ond zone in which the property is loceted.
`~. 'fhat approval o!' th? variince v~ould not, allow eitF,er an incre~3se~i siqn ,ar,=,, oi~ ,a;;
1 additional number of free-st.anding signs.
~ 6. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
i
I
V 1-G
-1-
~
~ '
~
~
~- • ~. -. . ~ , _ - --__ _-- - --__ ----___._._.._
. - .,,~ ' y~n,:,;.
~' ~ .
.
NOW, THEREFORE, I3E IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Varzance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Aneheim.
1. That reasonable landscaping shall be provided on subject property in accordance with
the adopted Service Station Minimum Site Development Standards, as indicated on the plans.
j 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3.
THE I~'OREGOING RES~JLUTION is signed end approved by me this $th day of September~ 1966e
• ~1 .
~ ~
C~IAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
L'
SECRETARY AHEIM CITY F~LANNING COMMISSION
Pro Tem
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ae BurgeSS~.•, ~g~~~, af the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted at e meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on
August 29~ 1966, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSiONERS: Gauer, Farano, Mungall, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Herbst.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of September, 1966.
.~
.~/
SECRETARY AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
Pro Tem
RESOLUTION NO. 64
V2-G _Z_
~~
„ax
~; ,
r 1' ~
~
~
~~ . ---
;a;
~
~
a