Loading...
PC 66-881 Pco~-R~ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF ?HE CITY OF ANANEIM BECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM T}{AT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFJCAT'ION N0. °o-o7-zo gE qpp~OVED WHEREAS, the Ciry~ Planning Commiselon of the Cit of Mehei did recelve a verj,fled Petitlon f r eclassifice- Uon ftam VERNA ROWE9 ~G, FENNIMAN AND ~MpAN'fy ~,~ Wes ~ G~crr:ir.~~n;ne~_ tha ru;;ertcr„ ~a~i: orr..;, O~v,mer; PENNIMAN AIJD ~MPANY, 5-:7 West Ccrnnornnea'.tt;9 F,~:_zrtc;•~~ Cal:rorn°a, Acent of r,z.rtair, :eal prope°ty situatea ~r. t}:e C;ty or Anahe:n;9 Ce~nr.~; ~F o_~„az, 5:;,~z ~1: C~1-::o~~.za oescr~bed as being the Eas~ ::iO,J~ fe2t cr ~~~a West i~"'.OC fee' of the Ea,t 2,~~,p~ °eet o: ti;e SoLt!; 32u,00 fee~ or" ?oi : in B..,k A o: T.scc Nc, ~.~ ~r ma ~., ~ . r F°ec;:dr:1 :r. c~ock paye i2, of h1iscei:aneous Maps in the o:'t:.:e o: the Reco~de~ ~. ;a'.~ C,.~,,nty ; ~nd WHEREAS, the Clty Plenning Commisslon did hold e public hesrinQ at the Clty Hall in the City of Meheim on ~- 5eptember 26~ i966 at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as required by ; lap end In accrordance with the provistone of the Anehelm Municipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence _-I ? (ot end against seid proposed reclassificetion end to investigete and meke [indings end recommmdetione in connectlon thercwith; and WHEREAS, seid Commiasion, a[ter due Inspection, investigatlon, end etudy mede by itaelf and !n ita behelE, and eEter duu considtrration of ell evidence and reports o(tered at aeid hearing, doee find and detertnine the Eollowing fects: 1. Thet the petitioner prop~ses e rcclessificetion of the ebove described pro~erty (tom the R-3, fJui :ip:e Famiiy Residential, Zone to ~he R-2, %~00, One Famiiy~ Z~~r.~ to s~bdivide subj~ct r~roper?v ~o:- iuture deveiopment with t:omes. 2o That tiie proposed :ec~:ass:fi:aticn :s :n cor.iurr,,ar.~e ~n+_:h ±i:e General Pian~ 3. Thot the proposed teclnesificotfon of eubject property ls neceasery and/or desIreble for the ordeily nnd pro- per deveLopixent of the community. 4. 'I'het the pcoposed rrclaesi[icetioc oE subjeet propeRy does propmly relate to the zones eed their permitted ueen locelly e~toblished In cloee pro:imity to ~ubJect pcope~ty ~nd to t6e zones end their permitted ueea genere~lly eateb- li~hed theou~dout the community. 5~ That tt:e prepesed reclassification o:' subject preperty dces nct reou'.re dedication o: improvement of tiie abutting street, iio,ve-rer,, side~~alks ~:~ii~ be required. 6. That no one appeared in copcsiticn to subjec: petii;on~ ~ ~ R-A -1- ! ~ ' NOW, THEREFORE, BE I1 ~SOLVED thet the Anahelm City Plannii._. ~ommission does hereby rernmmend to the CIty Council of the City o[ Aneheim th~t subject Petltfon for Recl~saification be ~pproved ~nd, by ao doing, thet Title 18-Zoning of the Aneheim Municipel Code be emended to exclude the above deacribed property from the R-3, Multipie Family Rasiderrtiaiy Zone 3co te incorporat.e said desc:ibed p~opert}~ in'o the R-2 500~, One F~mily, Zore, upor the fc:lc•r;iny condition~ ivl~lcl-~ arr r~ereby iound tc be a necessary pzerequisite to the p:opcsecf ~~se c:' suoject. p~•oper~y in oroer to pres?:ve tne safety and general welfare of i:h? citi:ans of t~:e C;t.y of Ar.a:,eim, ie That the owner ~~! ;,;b?ec! p:ope~ty shal: pay tc tne City of Arahe~m tne s~~m of !5Q per front foot along Empi:e Street, fo: tree p:3n~ing purposes~ 2. That a Parcei Map !o :ec~,d the approve:i divisien c1 subject prupex-ty be SUbI~l'~r-p ~~ the City of Anaheim for approval, ~r~9 then ~e recorded in the ;;:fice o~ t.t~e O:anye County Recorder~ 3~ That the sidewaiks shali oe inst~l:ed alor.y Empire Street, as required by the City Er.gineer and in 3ccordance ~nitt~ standar:i pi:ars and ,pecifications nr. ~ile in t}~e cf: ire of the City EngTneer, and shall Ue cemp:ie~7 •n~ith pr:cr to :inal building and zuning inspections~ -3a hat the otim er or s~bject prcperty st~all pay to the C!ty oi Ananeiu: ti~e sum of $25~00 per dwei:ing unit, _o be used f'or park and :ecreatior, pui•posesy said amount te ba p;id at tf:e time the Bui:dina Permit. ;s issuedo 5~ That ~ondition Nos~ : ar.d ~~, abo~e mentioned9 snal? Le coir~piied with ~viti~in a period of iR0 days fzcm iate nereofy or su:i: rur;her tin,e as tJ,e City Ceur,cil may qrant.~ THE FOREGO{NG RESOLUT[ON Is signed ~nd ~pproved by me thi G? i, c~,y or October, l i~G~ ~ u-~-c/ CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLA~INING C MMISSION ATTEST: ~'/ " "~Ui i~~/' ., LC~G'c,~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CiTY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CAL[FORNIA ) COUNTY CF ORANGE ) se, CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City Plannins Commisaion of the City of Mahelm, do 6enby certify that the fore- going reaolution was paseed and adopted et ^ meeting of the City Pianning Commiesion ofthe City oE Anahelm, held on September 2(i, i~tib~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote o[ the membera thercot: AYES~ COMMISSIONERS: A:1^ed, F;ranu, Gaue: , Her;,~st, Munga7 :, k~r;:;nc~, Camp~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None, ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: hone. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this Et!i day o1' Octicber, i?bo. R RESOLUTION NO. ~~+ ~ ~ R2-A . :;~_ ~ ----- ~~22 ~~C~ ~~~.. ~~~~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -2- ~