Loading...
PC 66-9RESOLUTION N0. PC66-9 A RESOLUTION GF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DISAPPROVAL OF AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN N0. 68, THERETO ~ WHEREAS, petition for Reclassification No. 65-66-120 was filed proposing seclassification of a parcel of land less than 20,000 square feet to the C-U, COMMERCIAL OFFICE, ZONE; and WHEREAS, since the C-0 Zone requires that an area development pla~ be prepared and advertised for public hearing when petitions requesting reclassification to the C-0 Zone ,~ ~ encompass less than 20,000 square feet of property, Area Development Plan No. 68 was prepared and advertised for public hearing; and _ •i s WHEREAS, the Planning Commission directed the Development Services staff to prepare a \;~ study for properties on both sides of East Street extending from the Riverside Freeway to , ~ Lincoln Avenue; and j WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold public hearing at the City Hall in the :' City of Anaheim on June 6, July 20, 1965 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing i _ having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said Area Developmpnt ~ ~ 1. Plan, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and ~I WHEREAS, said Commission, a~Fter due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of the evidence and reports offered at said ' ~ hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That additional dedication for street and alley widening would be necessary to provide for the increase in use of property presently being used for single family residential use, thereby considerably reducing the amount of useeble lando 2. That Reclassif?cation No. 65-66-120 was recommended for disapproval to the City Council on the basis that it H~ould inject commercial uses in the c2nter of a blo,;k completely developed for residential purposes; and that any future re-development of the area should be made on a land assembly basis rather than on a parce~ by parcel basis. ', 3. That because said petition for Reclassification was recommended for disapproval, ~ the Area Development Plan is considered unnecessary. ' 4. That as a result of the special area study, consideration of a possible General Plan : Amendment encompassing properties in the vicinity of East ar,d Sycamore Streets and La Pal.ma Avenue and East Street should be set for public hearing before the Commission, in order that property owners in that area might be apprised of the type of re-development of their properties which may be considered favorably. 5. That no one appeared in opposition, and one person appeared recommending that an acceptable plan of development for the entire block be prepared prior to approval of any 1 reclassification of properties in the bJock bounded by Sycamore and Wilhelmina Streets. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim ~ity ~lanning Commission does hereby recommend to the City Council of the City of Anal:e:m disnporoval of Area Development Plan No~ 68, on the hasis of the foregoing finciings. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and appro~~~d 'ny m tiiis 2iith day of Jul 1966. -Lli~-~•~ .~ AIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAPdN G COMM SION ATTEST: ...1.-.-~f.<-.-,. u:::.... ^` ~ , SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and a~opted at a meeting of the City plannin9 Commission oF the City of Anaheim held on July 18, 1966 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by vate of the members thereof: .1; ~. i :j . ~ ,t: ' - 1 - ~ ~ ` ~ ~. • 5 ~I .~~ ~ ~ :. ,~• ~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED, GAUER, HERBST, MUNGALL, ROWLAND, CAMP. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PERRY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 28th day of July, 1966. ; G'?, ~.;• t.. -~~,~.~~ SECRETARY kNAHEIM CITY PLANNING CQMMISSION . RESOLUTION N0. 66-9 - 2 - i; I r';--~ I ~ I w r { .AY fi~r ' ' C ~:. ~ ~ ~.- . . ~^?"..I.Of ~ .. . . 1~ . ~r-2 .._. .. -' fy~:`• - ri:~ gf:t~ ;i:_ ~ ~~' F ~,.- .. .`