PC 66-95RESOLUTION N0. PC66-95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY PLAIdNING C~OMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIN~
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO„ 1R29 BE GRAIJTED I;4 PART
6 ~
;i ~
WHEREAS, tl~e City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verif`ied
petition for Variance from ELIE FILIP, lli South Bush Street, Anaheim, Cali!'ornia, Owner;
RICHARD 0. MqTHER, 201R North Ross Street, Santa Ana, California, Age:~t of certain rezl
property situated in tlie City of Anaheim, Count~~ of Orange, State of California, described
as Lot 3R in Bloc}: B of the Loreiei Tract, as Fer map recorde~l `_n 3ook 2S, page 24 of
Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County, California
~nd
WHEREAS, ti~e City Planning Commission did i,oid a public i•:ec:ing at ti;e City Hall i~
tne City of Anaheim on September 26, 1966, at ?_:00 0'cloc:: P.hi., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required b, la,a and in ac;;ordance witi; t:,e provisions
of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chaoter l~o6H, to '~ear and cor.sider evidence for and
~gainst said proposed variance and to investigahe and maE:e ~indinos and recommendations
in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Cominission, after due inspection, investigation, and study r:;ade by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered
at said hearin9, does find and determine tt:e following ;acts:
1, Ti~at tlie petitioner requests a variance from the Anai;eim N~unicipal Code: to parr..it the
expansion of an existing non-conforming muitiple farnily development on subject property.
SECTION 1r~~2}~.p50 1-b
SECTION 1~+ 2+~ 050( ~- ,1
SECTION lf~ ~F 050(5-b)
SECTION 1>j ?s, 0~0(6-a 4
- h1inimun. lot ~,vidcl, (7p ;'ePt required - 5G feet e~;stina.)
- h1inimur.. r"loor area per dvreiiing unit (700 square r'eet.
required - ~:~0 syuare ieet prop~seo.)
- Maximum height within ;:~0 feet of singie farnil~; residenti
zone (one story required - tr~o story existiny.)
`b_<) Ninimum structural set.bac~: along the souti~ p;operty line
(9 !'eet required - 5 fe~t propos?ci.)
1. That the iequest f'or waiver of' t.i~e min~mum floor area per d~1~e11inq unit to construct
an additional sub,tandard dwelling unit ef 4~0 syunrp feet i- i:erek~y den:e~ on t!:e basis t.i~at
the living environment created would be undesi*able, and r.oulti establish a precedent tor simil~~r
requests for conversion of er;.ra space into substandard d~,vellir,q units.
3e That the balance of the raquested v~aivers ~re found to be necessary in o;d~; to
estabiish a non-conf'orrninq two story apartrnent as a conf'orming structurr-.
4~ That there are exceptiorial or extraord',nar, circumstances or conditior,s ~3pp~ic.aUle
to the pi•operty involved or to the intended use of tl~a prope;ty tnat do not apply q,~;,FI-o11;
to the propnrty oi• class of use in tt~e sanie v;cinity and zone,
5. That the requested vari,;tce, as appr d, is necesSary for the preservatior. and
?njoyment of a substantia] property right poss~ssed by other proparty in t.i,e same vicinity
and zone9 and denied to the property in question.
6. That the requested variance, as approved, wil~ r.ot be rnaterial;y detrirr:enta] to ti~e
public welfare or injurious to the property or iinoroverr,ents in suci~ vicinity and ~one in whici~
tiie property is locate~~.
7. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition~
: .~.,~.
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does hereby granVs bpj~ect
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which ere hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens o( the City of
Anaheim.
1. That thi~ Variance is granted subject to the cor~pletion of Reclassification ho,
66-67-27,
~ 2• That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file
with the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection.
3. That subject property shall be developed sub~tan~ially in accordance with plans and
specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marbed ExhiUit Nos. 1, 2, znd 3.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed snd approved by me this 6ti~ day of October, 1966.
, / / ~
`~~~-Ct+-f~% . ~.c-._ ,~~
HAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL NN1NG C MMISSION
ATTEST:
- ~' ~ ~.-i
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIrORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ An~1 KI'@bpy. , Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify thet the (ore-
going resolution was pessed and edopted at a meeting o( the City Plenning Commission of the City o( Anaheim, held on
5eptember 26, 1966, et 2:00 o'clock P,M., b}~ the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, H?rbst, Mungali, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
AE3SENT: COMMISSIONERS: yone.
1N !VITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of Octobery 1966.
C~L~%-~-~_/ j~z~--G~-.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 95
V2-G
-z-
f}~
s,~
ia
I:~ .
;i }
'+. .~Y
~