Loading...
PC 66-99~' RF.SOLUTION NOo PC6o•-99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANIJING ~MMISSIOfJ OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITIOIJ FOR ~NDITIONAL USE PERMIT RR5 BL- GRANTED YJHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified pet~t.ion fo: Conditional Use Permit from HENRY WAGNER, 975 South State College Bouleva:•d, Anaheimy Calif'ornia, Owner; WEGER ~MPANY, ItdCORPORATED, RR79 West Pico Bou?evard, Los Angeles, California, Agent of certain real property situat.ed in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described in Exi~ibit "F~" attached I~ereto and referred to ~~erein as though set r"orth in full 4 ~ ;dnd WHEREAS9 tne City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Cit~,,~ Hall in the City of Ananeini on September 26, 1960, at 2:00 0'clock P,M., no±ice of said public '~earing having ~een :iuly given as required by law an~ in accordance VJltfl ti~e provisior.s of tt-~e Ananeim Mun:^ipal code, Ci:ap~er 1Ro64, to t~ear and consider evidence ;or and against said proposed conditional use and to investigate and maF:e findings ano recon,mendations in cunnection therewiti, and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made b~- itself and in its banalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and :eports oifered at said hearing, does :ind and determine the foliowing facts: 1n That the proposed use is properly one .`cr ~,viiic;: a Conditional Use perrnit is authorized by tl~~is Code, to wit: to permit the establisiiment of a restaurant ~vith cocNtail lounge on Parcel "D" and a walk-up reataurant on Parcel "B" ~r~itii tivaive. of: SECTION 1R.52.060(2-a-1-b) - Rpquired front setback lanoscaping on Parcels "B" and "D" (1G i'oot ~i~inimwn required -? feet ~:OpOSEt7.~ 2, That the request for waiver o£ the i•equired landscapinc~ setback is heieby cienie~ on the basis that sufficient proporty is available to permit de~~e:oprr,ent in accordance ~n~it!~ Code standards; that granting this waiver would set a p7•ecader.t for si~r:i]ar reyuests :'or vacant industrial parcels throughout the Citygand would br deieterious to tf~e future _levelop- ment of the City's industrial areas. '. ?t:at ;.he proposed use will not adversely af:ect ti~e adjoining iani ~~ses an~i the growtl: and devFlo~m~nt ot ihe area in ~.vnich it is proposed to be locat.ed„ a, That the size and shape of the site oropos?ci :'or ti;e use is ;~dequate to ailo:;~ the full developi;~ent of the propcsed use in a mar.ner nct det.rimental ±o tf~e part.,,~,,),a~ :irea no: to the peace, health, safety, a^.d general welfare of tlie Cit.izens of tt~e Cit;~ n~ An~:}~eir;. 5.. That the aranting of the Conditienal Use Per~oit under tt,e condi! icns imF:osed, i!' any, will not be detriment.al to the peace, health, safety, and aeneral w?]f~+re of ,F;e Citizens rf the City of Anaheim. 6. That one person, representi~g an industrial firm to the west oF sut,:jPCt prope:ty, appeared in opposition to subject petition~ ~ ,+tx . ..-.~. S ~~ ,, ,, ;~ s ;. 1 ! ; j ~ :, I. i I I~_ . ;'~ ~ ~ ~ ~; ~! s' ,~ f' ' :j ~ . * ~.. , , ~ 'it~f: :;0~'13 i'ruti o ~~~L ~. _.. ~;~~ t' :t, ~ ~. . . , ~. ;• I,'.~ ri:~ I: . ' ~ ~ : i I.i~~ i~nsi; 1~221 foot Of Loi: 2;) of ~lnnli~:i.~r: ,.it~:u:iioci,.i~u iiiin ~:i1• c~(' ~,n,~li~:iia ' Count,y of Oran~;u ,Stato of Cn] l fornln, r~a ;;I~oa~n on n;:;:~„ tk:,~rcnC ~ rccordod in bool: 3,Po~•n; lv2 to 1Glt incl~tn[vo of iii:iccll~~nr,c~i:r ~t"~.r~~t:~ .Ln L•ho offlco of tho Count;~ l~r~cordur of Lo:~ ~1n~~olua r,o~_~iil,,~~~;,i7,iforuli~ ~aid dist~nco bain;; moa^urod frcie tho ceni,cr ].S.n~~~ of isnl.l +;oi~~l ;~nri 5tato Colloeo tSoulovnrd,a~ ahown on tho map oi' Trnci: ;uo. 1~7~'~ rocorcioci in boolc 1E~4,par•o3 147 and 40 of ooid !-iiaoullanooua !•.ni~n,tlio ultii,int-•~ rridth of both lioll Road and St;ato Collo~;u isoulov~rd t;c~ bo ~3 fooL- .from contor lines according to inform~tion from the City of ~n,~liuiia c~:; of this daYc~ thu~ malcin~; thv not parcel 150 feot on Statc~ Coil.o~;o Uouio- vard by 375 foot on Hall }tood. LXCEP`PING '1'i1LRE;Ptt024 THAT portion thoraoi' docribod uo follooi:~ : The Waeterly ninoty five(95) fee1: by a net dopth of 15U foet; nnd '•'^•~'^^'.;r..r~,~.~ie„gt~1~.~L~~nqt pg,~nur of naid Lot 20,auid ?ouLhoa~;; '' ' Tho ~a~t~:ly 273 ~feot of tho Southerly 17$.00 foo1; of snid loL• 20(Por tho purpos~ ot' this doscript;inn tho on~Corly lfn~ of lot 20 to bo tho center 7.ino of Steto Col].~Fo L~ou]ovnrd nnd t;ho southorly lino of lot 20 to be tho contor lino of E3n11 Ror~ci, as shown on tho nbove montionod fiocorci o3' Sui•vo;; .) EXCEPT THERLF'ROM: that portion thoroof descr.itiod ns follows: Tho Easterly ona hundrod ond aevonty oight/foet by a depth oC 173 feet or :.net dimenaion of 150 feot 4 t~ -:...~ C1 > b~ ~. / F ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby grent subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject proaerty in order to preserve the safetp and general welfere of the Citizens of the City of Anahcim: 1< That this Conditional Use PPrrnit is gzznted ;ubject to the compleiion of Reclassification PJoe 66-67-23. 2~ That any air-conditioning facilities proposed sl~all be properly shielded frorri view from abutting streets, and sound buffered from adjoining residential property, p:ior to °inal build- ing inspection. . 3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance wi±h plans and specifications on file in the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit n;c. 1, provided, liowever, ttiat deveiopment plans for the propos?d restaurants shall be submitted to tt;e Pianninq Cormi~ission and City Council for appro~ral; and further provided tnat setbac}:s and landscapino and any signs proposed shall conform with the requirements c. the A1-., Light Industrial, Zone. i THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is ;igned end approved by me this Et~; day of October, Igbh, i ~~; -G u~ ,c. /~-,1 CNAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLA~tNING CO~ihtISS10N ATTEST: / G%~-`L.-t~ ~ ~ ZC~~-?~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANN[NG COh1MISSION STATE OF CAL:FORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHE[M ) I, Ann Krebs, Secretary oE the Gty Planning Commission of hhe ~ito o{' Anahe,im, ~o h, !u~,y ~~~;~Y .r~a~! !hT foregofng resolution wes passed end edopted at a meeting of the Cir-.y~ plaAn~ng ,Gg~*misFio~~~ o~ 1~~~ c~~r o~ ~mah~~in:., held on Septembe: 26, 1966, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the tollowing •;Af! ~( tlre mem~rr. chc.Ayf: AY~~ COMMISSIONERS: Ailreo, Faia;;o, Gauer, K,ur.-:a1-: r.,,~,;d~ . ;.E, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~%erost. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS; •'~~~e. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havehereunto set my hend this 6t'~ day of 0• -~r, l~ai „ ~' v ~%'t '~-C., /~~. c, G~ ~t7_ - SECR£TARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMM1IISSION RESOLUTION N0. ~`3 C2-G -2- , ~~ I ~ ; I ~ F