PC 67-144;y`. '
il.. '4 t
1:' .
~
i
RESOLUTION N0.
PC67-144
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF6'SHE~ I 5y OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. e 6 ~ BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the Cit,y Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did recelve a verified Petition for Reclassifice-
tionErom L. KENPIEIH AND EDITH F. HEULER AND G. BARTON AND MARGARET D. HEULER, 220 West Cypress
Street, Anaheim, California, Owners; CARL E. NELSON, 1000 West La Palma Avenue, Anaheim,
~alifornia, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
F State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though
set forth in full
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commissiort did hold a public hearing et the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
~ July 6~ 1967~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as required by
~ law and in accordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear end consider evidence
for end agefnst said pioposed teclassification and to investigate and m ake findings end recommendations in connection
_ therowith; and
~
:~
[{ -
1 *
~ ~
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself and in its behalf, and
efter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes e reclassification of the above described property from the R-A~ Agricultural,
Zone to the C-0, Commercial Office, Zone to estab:ish a 6-story medical-office facility.
2. That the proposed reclassification is in conformance with the General Plan.
3. Thet the proposed reclassificetion oE subject property is necessary and/or desireble for the orderly and pro-
per developm~ent of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassificetion of subject pr~perty does properly relate to the zones end their permitted
uses locelly esteblished in close proximity to subject property end to the zones and their permitted uses generally esteb-
lisfied thtcughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not require dedication
or improvement of abutting streets, since this has been acquired in accordance with the
requirements of the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
6. I'hat if future use of the propsoed structure is for other than medical-office facilities,
parking shall be provided in accordance with the parking requirements for the uses then
established:~
7.That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
-1-
R-A
._ '_;..°
~
i~
4 ~
. ;~,
~
~ tUR A VALUABIE CONSIDERATION, recaipt ot wni~n ~, nereoy acknowledged, ~+i ,
~ ~'$II.EYi PORTER end I.AURA PC" ':E, ea Soint tenants ,, '
rekiy "
h
-
d
l'
`s,
~;'
~ ;
• ,
o
e ~
x+.
,
,t
` i ~
~
G:AN7 to G. F.AFTON iWGZER and ,iARGAR..~'i D. H~J'..s.~, husoand and Wife, as ,Joint tenaat~, es .
t,i
'~~
~`
~
G to an u.zdivided one-half interest and L. i i'%TH A~UI.~t and EDIT}i r^. AEULEft, husband and ~;!
f I
: Wife, as Soint tenanta, as to an undivided oae-half intemst,
e
County of p
~'~
,
£, ~~
i ~
thc real prc,perty in the C ty of Anaheim }`;
~
~ „ Srat3 of California dezcribed as:
' I ~ i
~
;
s -
- That portion a? the South West quarter o: Section 4, Tovnship 4 Sout~, Range 10
~ ,
y
i:~
y~ West, partly :+ithin the Rancho Los Coyotea and partly in the Rancno San Juan Ca~oa "~
~i d.e Santa Ana, es sbown on a~ap recorde3 in 3ook 51, page 10 of Miscellaneous
~ .
, `
~ b;aps, records o: Orange County, California, described as folloWe: i;
I
' i
i~
+ Eeglnning at tne ~ou„hvest corner o: said Section 4; ther.ce A'ortherly along the ,y :
;~
~
~ Sdest 11ne of eaid Section 4 to a poiat in the Fleaterly proloc~qation of tae South 1
~ line o: Lot 2, as said Lot 2 is eho:+n on a asp :iled in Eook 1, pa~e 57 ~f
'
Y
~ Record o: Surveys, in the o:'~ice o: tne County Recorder of Orange County,
~ ~
~ Ca~i°ornie; t?~er.ce Easterly along said Westerly prolongation and along said
h ~c
f
own on
South line of I,ot 2 to the Southvest corner of Lot 3, ae said Lct 3 is s ,
_ .,
~ a map ;iled in Book l, page 55 of Record oP Survey~, ir. the oYfice o:' the County ~,;~
I Recorder oi 0:'a:~3e Counc,y, Cali~ornie; thence Southerly alon,3 the Southerly {r
~
prolor~ation o: tne 11est of said Lot 3 to a point in the South line of eaid ;_
~
~! Section k; thence Westerly elonb seid ~outh line of Section 4, to the point of beginninr3
~
~. ~
r
€ i _...~cceptir.g tnere:rom the kesc 410.00 feet. -
- -`,
; ~
`'j
;i
r
'. Sub,~ect to taxes ~or the Yiscal year ~967-68, not yet payable. ~.
:~ ~.
,~
. I .. _..ti.__,. ._ .,.........,.,+.. ..__a..,_.__ .. .. .__~_,_~......, ooePmrnte flnd y`
5
C
~
NOW, THEREFORE, SE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City P1enning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petltion for Recleasificetion be epproved end, by so doing,
that Title 1&Zoning of the Anaheim Municipel Code be amended to exclude the above described property from the
R-A, Agricultural, Zone, and to incorporate said described property into the C-0, Commercial
Office, Zone upon the following conditions which are hereby f.ound to be a necessary pre-
requisite to the proposed u=_e of subject property in order to preserve the safety and genPral
welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. That the owners of subj,ct property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00
per front foot along La Palma Avenue, for street lighting purposes.
2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15~
per front foot along La Palma Avenue, for tree planting purposes.
3. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a 5-foot public
easement along the easterly boundary of subject property.
4. That vehicular access rights to Glen Drive and the alley to the east shall be dedicated
to the City of Anahe3m.
5. That any air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view.
6. That outdoor lighting facilities for the parking loi of subject property shall utilize
down-lighting standards no greater than 6 feet in height.
7. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with within
a pesiod of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
8, That Condition Nos. 5 and 6, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final
building and zoning inspections.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 13th day of July, 1967.
,~ 1 t~ ~~~~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CO SSION
ATTEST:
f_.
~~z~Z~ = ~ .~"L%,f~~.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Kr ebs, Secretery of the City PlanninQ Commiasion of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
going resolution was passed end edopted at e meeting oEthe City Planning Commiasion ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
July 6~ 1967~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote oE the membets thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Mungall, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: vone.
i
~~i *
~'~ .~ 's
~.~~ :~
~~ ; ~
~~ ~
:'~ ~
'M -
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Herbst, Rowland.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 13th day of July~ 1967.
G 'C-'7'7 ?~C ~ ~ G'`- ~ -
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 144
R2-A _2_
~