PC 67-153S:t:'- . .
PC67-153
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COhlMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
_ PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-•67-68 gE APPROVED
W~iEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclessifice-
tion Erom SOUTHEASI'ERN ASSOCIATION OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS P.ND HFIVRY WAGNER 975 South ~tate
College Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92806, Owners; C. MICHAEL, IN~RPORA'~ED, 8501 Bolsa
~i°'~ Avenue9 Midway City, California 92655, and ANN MADISON 866 South Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim,
~.?~ , California 92805, Agents of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim9 County oi
~ Orange, State of California, described as Portion 1: The South 323.00 feet of Lot 20 of
~~~ Anaheim Extension as shown on a map recorded in Book 3y Pages 162-164 of Miscellaneous Reco~ds,
b~ Records of Los Angeles County. Excepting thes efrom the South 173.00 feet of the East 173 f eeto
~ Portion 2: The North 310~00 feet of the South 633.00 feet cf Lot 20 of Anaheim Extens?on as
~i shown on a mao recorded in Book 3, Pages 162-164 of Miscellaneous Records, Records af Los
~, Angeles, County. Portion 3: Lot 20 of Anaheim Extension as shown on a map recorded in Book :i,
~, Pages 162-164 of Miscellaneous Records, Records of Los Angeles County. Excepting therefrom
~ ' the South 633~00 feeto
~ !'
:~ ;
't
,I
i
~~
~I
i
~ ~ ; and
i
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
; July 17~ 1967~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as required by
law end In eccordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence
for end egeinst said proposed reclessiEication and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WI-IEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, end study made by itself and in its behalf, and
efter due rnnsideration of ell evidence and reports offered at seid hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
~
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclessificetic,n of the ebove described property from the R-A~ Agricultural~
Zone to the M-1, Light Industrial, Zone for Portion IJo. 1; R-3, Multiple Family Residential,
Zone for Portion No. 2; and R-1, One Family Residential, Zone ior Portion i~o. 3.
2. That the proposed reclassification was considered in conjun~,tion with General Pian
Amendment No. 91.
3. Thet the p:oposed reclassificetion of eubject property is necessary and/or desirable [or the orderly and pro-
per developnrent of the community.
4. Thet the proposed reclessification of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their permitted
uses locelly esteblished in close proximity to subject property and to the zones end their permitted uses generally estab-
lished throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the dedication and
improvement of abutting and proposed streets in accordance with the Circulation Eleme,t of
the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated ~y the
intensification of land use. ~
6. That 4 persons app~ared in opposition to subject petition.
-1-
R-A
,:~.
~b:.
,,~;,.,
i
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ..,;;SOLVED that the Maheim City Plenniag ~ommissioa does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim thet aubject Petition for Reclnssificetion be eppmved end, by so doing,
thet Title 1&Zoning of the Ar.aheim Municipel Code be emended to exclude the ebove described property from the
R-A, AgriculturoL, Zone, and to incorporate said described property into the M••1, Light In•-
dustrial, Zone (i~ortion no. 1), R~3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone (portion no. 2) and
R-1, One Family Residential, Zone (portion no. 3) upon the following conditions which are here-
by found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to
preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded
in the office of the Orange County recorder.
2. That the owners of subject prop.;rty shal] pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.CC
per dwelling unit to be used for park and recreation purpos?s, said amount to be paid as a
portion of the subdivision fees.
3. That trash storage areas sha11 be provided in accordance with approved plans on file
with the office of the Director of Public Works for Portion Nos. 1 and 2.
4. That ai] air~conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view.
5. That parking areas for Portions 1 ar.d 2 shall be lighted with downlighting a maximum
6 feet in height, and shall be directed away from the property lines abutting single family
residential uses in order to prutect the residential integrity of the area.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end epproved by me this 27th day of July~ 1967.
•~ ~ % i
' :~`~-~ ~T "
C AIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
v~'-'~w/ 1 a2L~/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COliNTY CF OR,~NGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
going resolution was pessed and edopted et e meeting of the City PIenning Commission oEthe City of Anaheim, held on
July 17~ 1967~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the folloaing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Herbst, Munga?1, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
~( ..
~ ~
~
~,~ "'t~* ..
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Farano.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hand this 27th day of Jl~ly~ 1967.
RESOLUTION N0. 153
R2-A
~ U122~t~ ~i~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-Z-
~