PC 67-155RESOLliTION NO
PC67-155
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 953 gE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive e vecified Petition for Conditional
Use Permit from HENRY SIEIi1BRIPJK, 506 South Revere Street, AnaYleirr., California 92805, O;nmer;
WALTER STEIIJBRINK, 516 South Revere Street, Anaheim, California 926J5, Agent of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full
s ~- ~~
:~ 4 ,
~~7 ~i
~
i
e ~
; end
NHEF.EAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on
July 6, 1967, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public heering having been duly given as required by
law and in accordance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.64, to hear and consider evidence
for and against said proposed conditional use and to investigete and make findings and recomm endations in connection
therewith; and '
WNEREAS, said Commission, after dee inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does :ind and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditior.al Use Permit is authorized by this Code, to wit:
Section 18~64.02G(3-g), establish a carwash, with waivers o::
SECTION 18.40.070(2-a-3) -Reauired front landscaoina.
SEC'IION 18.40.070(2-a-6) -Reauired interior landscaoinq. (2% required; none provideo).
SECTION 18~40.070(2-a-5-a) -Raauzred screen ?andscaoinq (along the west orooerty line).
2. That the proposed use wi11 ad~•ersely affect the adjoining residential land uses
to tne nor+h and west, which are residential in character.
3. That deed restrictions permit the utilization of subject property :or 2? commercial
uses on1y, however, these uses are quite compreh~nsive, but do not include a carwash.
4. That thP use prooosed is a type of automotive oriented facility, which vaould be
undesirable and detrirt~ental to the re~idential integrity of the area, because of its inherent
roise, lighting, hours of oparation, and traffic.
5. That the waiver r~quested from the C-1, General Commercial, Zone site develooment
standards indicate that the location and orientation o.` the proposed carwash on subject
property would not be in the best interests of the residents livino in thi=_ area.
6. That the proposed use~faill be detrimental t~ the oeace, health, safety, and aeneral
welfare o:` tne ~itizens o` the City o: Anaheim.
7. That no one ap^eared in opoosition tu subject pstition.
; I ~1-D
~'1 ~
F ~
~ ~
~~
~.
*
;~ ~
-1-
,., . ...
~._ ... _:
`T'7'_. ~.~:y,.:._,,.... .. .
~ • . ~ ~ . ~~~~.'~ •. ,~,ic• - -- :'S~'' ~
5
r.
~ :-7
1 y 'il
~~ ~
i
I I ;
i
~~ ~S
; y. ,
~ ~
I h
.I %~
; r..
~ i
• .i;
i ! ~i
.i '-
i e ,:
~
' ~ ~ ~_
~ L._.....___~---...__.... . . ..-.: _.._...__... .--_-.•-~---------~... ........_--....._,_~..
ina;, portion oi lo;: 14 oi ~.r.:,1:ci;~ _.-..,.,io,z, ;r,c city o: r,~ar.ei:~,
coun;.y oi Gran;e, s~at_ o> ., ,. -
,. „41i:~:• `_a, a:: s;o::n o.^. a surv~y iy
~7illiam Y,amc~l, ~ eop~ o: ;,hicn i:, iiled ',n tl~~ o-'fice o: ci;e cour,:~
recordcr OT Sc1C~. COJII~%~ lfl FOJ.< j Guy~ 1ij ~; ~ 5~_Q. ~ ii ~li~ ~ i.05
6.n~elc~ Ccun~y :;aas'; sho~..n os :~ot ~ ._.
• " P~=' " :5is subu~visien" on
~ Lhe nap o: irsct i;u. loi%, reco:d~;; i;: coor; 59 ;~a,es 43, ~:; a~d :5
~ oz tAiscellaneous :;aps, i~ ;~,:: oi:ice o; ,,~io cocnty rero~,lor,
uounded ',-,y ;:.ast SanC~ r.r,a S~r~~ C, +'luc~= ~ti~ ;;vc;~ua and lots 10~
~ througn 115. as shor~~ on said map of [:~ct ;;o. 1c,97.
II
+~ ~:<:;cPT that portion L.'~rYEOI 1•,i~g sou~n~rly o: a linc- parall~l with
~ and southc:ly 130.u0 iza~, r~easurcd ~lor,~ ;.ize wcst line o; s~id
~ Plaeentia Fv~nue, ;0.0~'? reet ~viuc, iro~~i ii:~~ soutn line o: sz:ti i.ast
~, ' 5anta 1~~a StreE~, 49.;,0 fc~t v~idc-.
I.L;-U c~CcPT thv eastarl}~ 2~~.:J feet tiarcoi.
AL.SO c;CC_PT tl~~~ port:on oi Lot 14 0: A.~~nein ~xiensio:~, i~ the ~., ;.y
of <,naheim, Cou~t.y o: urange, Sta~. o: Cali:orni~, as p;:r survey b~
~liliiam Hamcl, a copy o: wn:.ch is filed i^ t;,e cf:ice o: th~ i;uunty
dacordcr ot Granoe ~oun~y in ::ool: 3, pag« 1•~3 i:t scq ~„nLitlcd ''Los
f.ngeles Couniy ~:taps° descriued ss folluws:
I Beginnin~ aL the t;orth~as~ cor:~c.: o: saiu Lo~ 1•1, as sho~.vn cn a I
( blap o: Tract 1597, rcco:ocd in Book 59, ;,agas 43, 44 a~u ~5 0~
! tdiscellaneous !daps, :ecords e: said Grar.,e Cou~iy; t~~~ce £outn i
~~ ~ 74~ 32' 09" i'~esi 135.J~ :e_•t ulon~ th~ tior;.n li~r.• o; saici Lot 14;
~ ; thr_nco ~outhvast.~rlv at right a~gles ~o s~id tio,-tn lir„~ to a line i
' ~ paralir.l with tne ;iorth linc of :.aid Lot 14 and 130.OJ :eet Soutn- ~
I~ ~ erly, measured along thc said ~asterl, line of szid Lot 1~; tnenee '
tdo:theasterly along said parallel line to ~ne c.asi.c:.ly line o: I
!~ ; said Lot 14; thcrc~ f~~orth 0° 10' 27° cast 130.00 :eet alor~7 said
L=asterly l~ne to tha point of aF•ginning. ~
' ; ..._...._..._.....w..._. ,._._......._....._.~~_..........,.>S,~_...~...r.._......~._.._._.._ ~
. ~4-- ~
J
r
N01V, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Annheim City Plenning Commission does heteby deny subject
Petition for Conditional Use Permit on the besis oE the eforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me.this 13th day of July~ 1967.
~ ~~/'~!l/~l~LZ.LI/' ~~,CLI~i~
CHAIRI7AN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
PRO TEM
ATTEST:
- ~
~~~ ~: _ `~i<.~._
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE j ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Kr ebs , Secretary of the City Planning Commission cf the City of Aneheim, do hereby cedify that the fore-
going resolution wes passed and adopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of pnaheim, held on
j July 6, 1967, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the folloa~ing vote of the members thereof:
~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Mungall, Rowland.
I NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~~one.
~ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, Herbst.
I~
,i IN WITNESS WIiEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of July~ 1967.
~i~ L ~ `~e_ ~ ~_ , i
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 155
C2-D _2_
61-
:: ~
~ '
~i w
~ 1 ~
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission doea heteby deny subject
Petition for Conditional Use Permit on the besis of the eforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me.this 13th day o` July~ 1967.
~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
PRO TEM
ATTEST:
-. ~
~~ -L-. ~ "~ i - ~.,
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CONMT;iSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Kr ebs , Secretery of the City Planr.ing Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resol~tion was passed and adopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of pnaheim, held on
July 6, 1967, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the (ollowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Alired, Farano, Gauer, Mungall, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, Herbst.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 13th day of July~ 1967.
., ~'~;. t'.-
C- C ' f
SECRET ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMM1IISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 155
C2-D _2_
;:~ _
,
`~ ~
,.~ ,~x
. . _ _ . ,. , . ~ _ . ..._,~v.....:... _ .:. ., ~. ,.., ... .
~- , , ; '~ .
~