PC 67-158RESOLUTION NO
P~67-158
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 1897 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive e verified Petition for Veriance
from SOUTHEASTEftIJ ASSOCIATION OF SEVf~1TH DAY ADVENTISTS AND HENRY WAGDJF~2, 975 South State College
Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92806, Owners; C. MICHAEI., INCORPORATED, 8501 Bolsa Avenue,
Midway City, California 92655, and ANN MADISON, 866 South Harbor Boulevarci, Anaheim, California
92805, Agents of certain real property ~ituated in the City of Anaheim, County o: Orange, State
~~ . of California, de=_cribed as Lot 20 of Anaheim Extension as shown on a map recorded in Book 39
~j Pages 162-164 0.` Miscellaneous Records, Records of Los Aegeles County. EXCSPTING therefrom the
~.L~ ~ South 633.00 feet.
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Fiall in the City of Anaheim
on July 17~ 1967~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice uf said public hearing heving been duly given as required
by law and in eccordance with the pcovisions of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chaptec 18.68,to hear and conside~
evidence for end egainst said proposed variance and to investigate end make findings and recommendations in connec-
tion therewith; end
WHEREAS, said Commissir,n, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports ofEered as seid hearing, does find and determine the Eollowing
iacts:
1. That the petitioner reauests a varionce frcm the Anaheim Municipal Code: to pe:mit the subdivision o`
Portion Plo. 3 of subject praperiy :~to i73 R•-!, One Famiiy Residential, Zoned lots:
SECIION 18.?_4.030 4•-a~ - Minimum_lot width (70-foot width requir~d; 60••foot width proposeo).
h1inimum lot area (7200 square f'eet required; 0000 square :-eet
aroposed ,
2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the seme vicinity
and zone.
3. That the requested varience is necessary for the preservation end enjoyment of a substential property right
possessed by other property in the seme vicinity and zone, end denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimt ~.tal to the public welfare or injurious to the pmp-
erty or impcovements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
5. That 4 persons aopeared in ooposition t.o subject petition.
-1-
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BESOLVED thot the An~heim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subJect
Petition for Vadance, apon the [ollowing conditiona wLich n=e hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to tl~e pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the aefety end general welfare of the Citizens of the City oE
Anaheim:
, 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification Dlo. 66-67-•68.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is ~i~ped ~ed ~pprov~d by me this 2~ith day of Ju1y, 1~6~.
~- / ~~
`__~''~~ t/`"~~ , c_ «-
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSEON
ATTEST:
~? L~~ /~(L-C-L '
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMNISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as.
C1TY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Kr ebs ~ Se:retary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting oE the City Plnnning Commission of the City of AnahPim,
held on July 17~ 1967~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Row~and, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: yone.
": ABSENT: COh[MISSIONERS: Farano.
.~ IN WITNFSS WHEREOF, I heve hereucto set my hand thia 27th day of July9 1967.
~} ~
C~ L ~ T- Z ?-r~ `i~! ~c~,/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS~ION
C I # RESOLUTION NO. 158
~~ [~
€a V2-G _2_
~ 1 ~~* ,j
i
C