PC 67-190RESOLUTION NO.
PCu7-190
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OI' THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 19 ~9 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Veriance
from GERALD ERLAiCDSOi;, P. 0„ BOX 246, FULLERTON, CP.LIFURtiIA, O~,a~ner of certain real ~_~operty situated
in the City o: Anaheim, Courty o:' Orange, State of California, described as Lot ?6 in B1ocH A
of Tract ~o. 247, as shown on a map thereof recorded in book 13, page 51, h4iscellaneou= h1aps,
records o` said Orangc County
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on AuguSt ?_8~ 1°67, at 2;00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as required
by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapte~ 18.68, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate end make findings and recoinmendations in connec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commissinn, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and after due cons+deration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the fo(lowing
facts:
1. That the petitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim Municipal Code: to permit the construction o` :
second dwelling un~t on sub) ect property,. '
~ECTION 1R_~f~ 0'~0('3-b) - Minimum °loor area (1??~ souare Peat required; c~l~ snuar~~ ,'-~~•±
proposed).,
SECTIOi~ 18~J8_050( t0•••a) _ N,inimum requir~d covered parking spaces (3 e ov~~~re~. oar~:in~
spa~es rPquired; 2 oarHina soa~ s orooosed).
SE~IOi: 18.,~8.05G(~, .~-~)_. ,~~yr,imum =_ide y;rd se bacF: ~Fi ~'eet requireri 3: Pnt propo=.e~)
2. That ther= are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applisable to the propetty involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not epply generafly to the property or class of use in the sam. vicini:y
and zone.
3. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation end enjoyment of a substantial property right
possessed by other property in the seme vicinity and zone, end denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the pm~
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
5. Tnat the re!ocation of tnc proposed yarage wii; perm:t ':o aoditiona! un~,overeci parG:ir,e.
spac:es ior a total of t;vo cover~.1 and t,vo un:ov~red oarr:inq so,a-
.~. ~rhat no one apneared in opnosition to sub~ect petition.
V 1-G
-1-
~
NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED thet the AnaheIm City Planning CommissIon does hereby grent subject
PetiUon Eor Varience, upon the following conditions which ere hereby found to be a necessary pcerequisite to the pro-
p~sed uee of the subject property in order to preserve the eafety and &enerel welfere of the Citiaens of the City of
Anaheim:
lo That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00
per front ;'oot along Sabina Street, for street lighting purposes.
2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15~ per
front foot along Sabina Street, for tree planl,ing pt~rposes.
3. That the owners oi subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum o: $25.00
p?r dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the
time the Building Permit is issued.
4. That Condition Mos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied v~ith prior to the
.- time that the Bui]ding Permit is issued or witt~in a period of 180 days from dzte hereof, which-
,~.~ ever occurs first, or such further time as the Commission or City Council may grant.
;; 5. That sub;ect prcrerty shall be developed substani:ially in accordance with plans and
{~ ' specifications on f:le v~ith the City of Araheim, marked Exhibit ivos. 1 and 2; provided, hoeeever,
~, that plans shall oe revised to provide for two covered and oneuncovered parking spaces.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIQN is si~ed wd approved by me th' 7th day o.` S ept ember, 1967.
/
~
, - t " .' ~ ~ i2 .. ~ _
~CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~i -
%' - ~~)2• %
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, An~ Krebs, $ecretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution wes pessed und adopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on P.ugust ^fi, 1967, at 2:00 o'clock P,M., by the following vote oI the members thereoL•
AYES: COMAlISSIONERS: Gauer, Herbst, hlungall, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ^1one.
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~llred, Farano.
IN iVTfNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto a.r,t my hand this 7th day of September~ 1967.
`~~ '~~F ~.~ , i.1~~ ~ .(4 J
1
; SECRETARY ANAHEIhf CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 190
` ~ ~ . V2-G _2_
sx•.
- . ' i _