PC 67-208RESOLUTION NO.
PC67~208
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 964 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Maheim did receive e verified Petition for Conditional
Use Permit from Co W. HARRISOI, 620 Kadota Street, Atwater, California, Owner; CLARICE GRAHAN~,
11561 Moen Street, Anaheim, California 92804, Agent of certain real property situated in the
City of Anaheirti, County of Orange, State of California,described as the south 77 feet of the
~~ south one-half of the west one-half of the west on rhalf of the northeast quarter of the southwest
, quarter of Section 28, Township 4 South~ Range 10 West, S.B.B.& M.
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Hell in the City oE Anaheim on
S~pt emb er 13 ~ 1967 ~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as required by
law and in eccordance with the provisior.s of the Meheim Municipal code, Chepter 18.64, to hear end consider evidence
for and ageinst said proposed conditional use ana to investigate and make findings and recommendations in conne:.tion
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Cammission, eftet due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself and in its behelE, end
after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered et said hearing, does find and deteanine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for whieh a Conditional .Use Permit is authorized by this Code,
Section 1~.64.020(2-b) to ~~it: establisn a rest nome for the zmbulztory aged on subiect
o:operty.
2. That the proposed use will not advecsely eEfect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of
the azea in which it is proposed to be located.
3. Thot the size and shepe of the site proposed for the use is adequate to alJow the full development ofthe
proposed use in a menner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, heelth, safety, and general welfare
of the Citizens of the City of Maheim.
4. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental
to the peace, health, seEety, and general welfare of the Citizens of the City ot Anaheim.
5. That any :uture plans for expansion should be reviewed and aoproved by the Plann~nn
Commi=_sion or City Councila
0o That no one aopeared in ooposition to sub~ect petition.
CI-G "1"
~~tx
•--'~c','~
,~
~~
:.
'i
I
~ -.
,I
i
~
NOW, 'I~iEREFORE, dE tT RESOLVED th~t fh~ Matuin City Plaanieg Commluiom Qoes Aereby ~nni w~xt
Petitlon bor Coeditiond Use Pw~lt. npoa the Eo1~owln~ cenditleet ~bid~ ar Raa-~ /wieC to M~ eNC~s~~ry p~eieqnl~ite
lo the peqwsed use of tbe s~bject oeooerty le or~er to peeaerv~ tp~ s~fety ~ed 6~nen1 oellsro of the Ctttsena oE the
Clty ot An~hdm:
lo That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00
aer front foot along Loara Street, for street lighting purposes.
2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15Q per
front foot alung Loara Street, for tree planting purposes. •
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on :ile
with the office of the Dirzctor of Public Works.
4. That fire hydrants shall be ins•talled as required and determined to be necesssry by
the Chief of the Fire Peoartment.
5. That the st*ucture shall be bm ught up to the minimum standards of the Uniform Buildinc,
Plumbing and Electrial Codes, as adopted by the City of Anaheim.
6. That a 6-foo± masonry wall shall be consl:ructed along the east property line.
7. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to the timz
that the Building Permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, ~vhichev~.r
occurs first, or such further time as the Commission or City Council may grant.
8. That Condition Nos. 3, 4, 5, and 6, above mentior.ed, shall be comolied with prior to
final building and zoning inspections.
9. That subject property shail be developed substantiaily in accordance with plans anci
specifications on file tivith the City of Anaheim, marked Hxhibit Nos. 1 and 2; provided however,
that any :uture plans for expansion shall be submitted to ar,d reviewed and approved by the
Planning Commission or City Council.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION Ie qpeed and ~qproved by me tkls 2~i~st day of September9 1967.
/ ~~ , ~
_ , ~~ ~~ :.~ ~~ ~
~CHAIRMAl7 ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COklll SION
(
ATTEST:
''~ .
~- z .. ~ ~)1_~~ L-,
SECRETARY ANAHEI6L CITY PLANNING CO~ItISS[ON
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ca.
CTTY OF ANAHEIM )
1, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City~Pl~olag Commi~aiau of tl+e Clty of Anoheim, do hesby certity that
the fore~ing resolution vves passed ~d odopted at a meeting of fbe City Plenain~ Commiesioe of tfie City of Meheim,
held m S ept emb er 13 9? 96', st 2:00 o'dodt P.IN.. by the foilowine vote of the membere tbereof:
AYES: CONbI~SSIONERS: Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Rowlar.d, Camp.
KDES: CO?LMISStONERS: tionea
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have haeunto set my 6aad thie 21st day of S eptember, i96?o
~//7 z t l " rl? i ~` _.
SE~RhTARY ANAHEIN CITY PLAN?~ING COlWISSION
RESOLUT[ON NO. 20~
C~G . ~_
~ax