PC 67-217PCb~ l~_,
RESOL'JTION NO.
A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM1t
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. b7 • en- 21 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclassifica-
tion from R~ J~ U~AG, 200~6 ~ania Ana Canyon Road, Ar.aheim, Ca~ iforn:a 928G~, Onner; ~;iP.C?~
~ ENGINEF_RING CAd1PANY, P. 0~ Box 366Fy AnaneimY Californi.a 42~052 Ayent o; .a:t~ir, .ea; orop=-r.~>~
•° ~'~~ situated in the City o` Ar,anPim, County o` O:arye, S±a!e of C3ii,'ornia, d=_srribed as n~a.nnica ~-_
a point, said point being th~: intez•==:.tion of •'_he :Jo°ther~y Rig~t o` 'iJay :ine or C: ~~ ?oa.~, ,~
~~ ' eer in vid`..h, witi~ tnc uru'.onga:ion of th r;Ast= :y bour..~~y r= of `' o a~~- c~-r: •-
^or`h_r,y aiona said p-oio-~ca`_ion ~;SC,..~ t.. `o a po;r.?, sa:i eo r,t ~~~c ~ ~ = io:, o,
~j~ s~.::: p,o u.c,.~'lor •cith :t.- So.:r.~r~y Rigt~~t o~ '~Vay :inr= c~ -%ar,t~ ~;n. .:~~vo•~ Ru ~, ... :o.
" - .
' ~n~ ~.= a'_onq said R' :~:. o. 'a; :n-. ~7't ,~ u:o- : o ..., !r•. ~o. -, ~r - ; . . 'v
;h~ ast r:y ;:r.a o` i .r.i a 3=~ ib=a - , , o ~ .- iioi,. _, : c: . ,
" tn_nc~ no~theas' .v aa r_: ~ 1 ,o _~=7.~oi~ ;~ F .r.t. ot +J-, .r ~~~o or,~ ,::. ~ .ur
°oai'to a ~o~nt. =3:; ooir~? oe:na ±.n, .n ~:__ _o oi _. i:or'_Y~-r: cr• o~ P~,~ _ u• .. '~
~ Boaf o-': :,t ir , _~'.`:, w'_t't; `h~ no:`..he:°i~ -o_on::~.~cr, oL _.._ ....., .y~no.,n~a:~, o` . _ :..~
~ s~i, oo:nt a~so :,eir '_t:- ._.,_ !'oint o: .e~inr:,;a
and
I '
~ t5'HF.REAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
~ Se:.t~rr.o~r ~5, ~9^' at 2:00 o'dock P.R1., notice oE said public hearing having been duly given as required
' hy law and in accordance with the provisions o( the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72,to hear and consider evi-
dence for and against said proposed reclassifica2ion and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in
~ connection therewith: and
~1'NEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following
facts:
L That the petitioner proposes a reclassifica[ion of the above described propertt• from the ~~.A, ~ _,: ;~.r o:.
Zon~, 'to :h= R Mu:~ip:e Fam'.v a-s'.~~rr.*.:~,. Zone.
~ Ti~at tn= propos~d re;:iassi.*'i:ataor~ is not in o,;o:rcan _.,~.?n tn~~ ~:... rnd _sn~ro~.
G•~ne_ai P~an.
,~ :i~at ?he =oposed _ _. :ass.. _; a`ion o: =_ub` .ct ; -op~rty i= ^o`_ re s=ar; ~~... o:
i~-=irab:= ;o: tnc- o:d~=i} and n=oo•~r ~r~eioom<,n' o` the ~oc,c,.n~_t.,
Tl~ac an~ro"zi o:` th~ , ropo=Ad , : Las=_i.`i:3tzor. ... _ •-;stac:._. ~r. .~.., _ _...... - , . . ,
~O* .i~:e ~~r..r,sion or r:;u:tic:e :'ar.i: +.e.-1op':'.=r,t so~:•n~rl! o` ~~.:h'_ , oc0:.-_'. ... :o:.
_,q a ..ons:..~rab'.~~ a:eatr_ poc...a`ion ~n_o ~~~. :;re~ tnar. „a= . `o'~- ,. . ....~n _.. _. ... _~ ;o•
~.:.r~rra; Plar~ ,:os ado~~:ed
`5. r.:a*_ .esider.!iai ..~.ns.t_~s sir._.ar ±o ,.,.at .. :opo~.., ,ro~.. .... r.o:~ :croc_:_-
...cd5 2.hdL dT'~ 5~? 3D37} i:ORi ;.h:t :0:~ ..='iSiL~ 9T9dS b\' .0];t;. ,_ `;Si..H'. LO::fi~-:d:'?-_.
.. ~f:d~_ 1C_°E35P(~ . i~l' .(; l.f~lE ...~d :OU:J -,97'.. ._ :u~:ct",OG U.~OGi.., , :fl .-...... .
if:5 i.I~9:r.1'_ r10'Ji ~}:T'OU,J^. E.1C.:~ _? :c!:17.1)' :i?51.:E=flii:l d:~:...;.
~ '.~hd~ lO~~;J .~f1S: I'cSl::c('.'.~!cl ..':P.OUr.,.?fl: P~~. ~.:'P?~7y' ~?Ef? c.c'd~~'i.,..... .... ~.. ~.. 'O
suh~e_.[ proper~_y; ar.~ tnat~tne pcopo=a~ ~~.~:~~-b ~n~;i =<hooi t.o `_he _..=t, an9 ti~~ :,:~o:,o~ei ,~t,~i~
- hoo: !o t^:e nest p.` s,.b',e .,rop~;~.y ..-e onsiy=;e~ ocpatit,;e ,.-__ ,,,'^ s~.r.a:e ran:: ,
. -_~ i~nt;a! ~.,s~s_
~ ?;;a!. s~~,b;ec` propar~'_, is _,~:eiooa~!e and be'tter =u~te~ :or iox ~~en~ity res:dent:~!
..... ~1oo:nan? .
=,. .::dt, o~e .=on. :?DIGS~n~~.na ine ~e~~':oc_. o: ii~t ~on ,I~:::;t'y ~.o ~ G-.:en: to
s~;b_` -_ prorer?';~ acr.~ar-d in op;~os:t;on.
~ itl ., R1-D -1-
~
~
. ' r.'4'. 'i7^;.., ~0~.-
e
" 4 :
~ ;' ~
N01V, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassification be denied on the basis of the
aforementioned findings.
1'HE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 5th .73y o.` Octob?r :9c'?.
/\ ~~5 i ~
/ 6.'-~l~-L ~ - " - ~.G~~~z, ~~~-
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMh1ISSION
ATTEST:
i '/ i4 ,
i i 'J~Z i.• /,f7 , . ~ ~/..
SECRETARY ANAHE?M CITY PLANNING COA1MISSION
S'fATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIh1 )
I, Ann !C:°ebs', . Secretary of the City Pianning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certiiy that the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
Sentember Z5, Ic5?, at 2:00 o'clock P.n1., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Gauer, Herbst, 6iunga] 1, RoH~land, Ca;n:,,
NOES: C0111MI~3IONERS: None.
ABSENT: COM~IISSIONERS: F•Ilred.
'' ,~ IN 1VITNESS ~~HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 5th "ay of Octobe^, 190?,
r~
e~ ' ' _
F I -. • -':~7?c c~-~= ;
,
~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COhiM1tISSION
~i RESOLUTION NO.%17
~' ~I
~ 1 R2-D
~-:, , - -2
f• ~ ~
€i ,
~~ `~
r•~
E{ ~ ~
i:
, i
S
r