PC 67-218i
RESOLUTION N0. pC67-2i8
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AN_~;{EIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. b~"'bF "23 BE APPRC:VEU
~x
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City ~° Anaheim did recelve a verified P~iition for Reclassificii-
tion from DP.VE A~ID G.EORG:A M~ DAVID~ON9 13~ 'lJest dal: Road, P.nat,eirn; Cai ;: urn;a 92R05; G,vne, _.;
MARC ANDREWSy lOlo West L?n:;oin AvenueY Anaheim5 Cali~orn'a ~;~~?^5, Fq:-nt o' ~e:tain i~a,
oroporty situated in 'the Clty of Anaheim; Co~~nty o!' Ursrae, Sta~e ot' Ca:i~orn:~, ;;, c,~~; ~y
~ Lot No,. 51 of Tract ?:o~ 2G90 -
, and
WHEREAS, the City Planning ComR~ission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
Sept.emb=z 2^ i9ti7s at 2:00 o'dock P.irS, notice oE said public hearing having been duly given as required by
law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim 111unicipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear and cvnsider evidenc~
for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and recommendetions in cennection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigaCion, and sb~dv m~de: ~ry s!;elf end in its behalf, and
efter due consideration of all evidence ond reports offered at said hearing, doe~ find and determine the folloa~ng focts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the above described property from .he R 1, Un? Farni iy
Resid~ntiai, Zone to tne C•0, Comme::i~i Office, Zon~ 20 oe:mit the use ~f a res:~ent~.ai etru:t,r:
a= a business ofri:-e
2. 'hat th= oropose9 re~iassii'lcation wouid be cons+_stant s:ith tne e~~.'.m; and fu±urr
?and use and zoning in tn:s goner2l area,
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or desirable tor the orderly c~nd ~ro-
per developrnent of the community.
4. That the proposed reclessification of subject property does properly relate to the r.ones and their perr~itted
uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generall~ estab-
lished throughout the community.
5. That Area Deveioornent Plan No~ ~ nas beAn ao ro•ied incom as=ina sih` +
nrooer';es~ P F t e.t ana abu~t:r.~,
6. That the propose~ reclassi~i~ation of subject oroporty reouires tne ~edi~ation of
ab_:tting stree±s in accordanc= ~ni*_h the Circulatior. &lement of the Ceneral P]an, due +o th~
anticieated im,rease in *_ra''t']~~. •nhi:h u~!il be aenerated by th~ ~ntensi:icatior: of land ~.is~„
. Tn~~ no on: a:~pear<-d in onuositior to ~ubjec*_ petition~
R-A
~.....~ . ...
. -. .. .. ..: __.._....'.:~-T=._~. . ~
__ ..... :.: .... .....
._... ._._....._.....
.. - ~TT~ ... __. __ _ -
• ' _ . . "_ __ -_ - '+r.~tM
., •• _' '~~.. ~n'h'. ~~~~
1-
.~
I
NOW, THEREP'ORE, BE IT RE'~OLVED thtt th~ M~hheiri City pl~enln~ (~;osa~Iuion doe~ hereby recommr,~d
to the City Council of the City oE Anah~ie t5at ~i~~et P~t',tlo~ 5ae R~e~tlos b~ ~pproved ~ad, by ro doin~,
th~t Title 18-Zoaiu~ of tl~e Aa~heim IM~siclpl Coi~ N s»s~ded lo wsClw4o tlM ~ow dwerib~d propaty f~om the
R-1, One Family Residential, Zoney and to incorr~ra't? sai~ descrit;ed prope:ty into the G•0;
Commercial Office, Zone upon the foiloNing cor~,ii':lo• ~;vhich are h_~=`~y founc '_o oe a recessaTy
pr?requisite to the proposed use of subject or~,er*-a ~.n o.der to pres•~rve *_'•.- safety and
general welfare of the .;ftizens of the Cit•, ;f Hti,>}.-.;m,
1. That the owners of subj=ct prorerty :.:o': ~eAd to lhe City o. Anaheim'a sirip o~ i~n~', ~3
feet in width, from the cent;;riine oi ~he s'.. e.=c a~o.. Ball Road, for street ~n~idening purcoses:
, 2. Th.;t the vehicular access ri~~~,ts, '.o :.~1~ R;~ad si:all be dedicateo to the City of An~heim.
3. That cr.= o;~mers of subject prnpert;~ shali pay to the City of P.naheim ~ne =_um or ~:%_~:~ :.~:r
front foot a'•r,uc; i;ll Rozd, fo: street lig~,~.:ny purposes.
~, Tnai Ccndition vos~ 1, 2,, and 3, ~t:r, •-; mentioned, sha:l be comFlied v,~~th within a cerio~?
of 180 days from the date he^eo`'9 or sucn 't;-:her time as th~• City Coun~.~.l ma~~ grant.
E is~a`~ .
~';~
~ TZ{E FORE~OING RE'iC?*_,uT?ON Ss e'g~~-~d a~;d approved by me this '' ~' ~~~~ pf Gctobar, 1'~c,7.
,. ~
-_ , ~ i
/ ~ ! ~Ct~iGL~~ . ~~_ _ "~~ "~~_/ -
~ CHAIRMAN ANaHEIM CITY PLAN:QINC CONMISSfON
ATTEST:
~•~. ` ~:' " J'I L C . ~ ~
SECR~TP.RY AN.iiiEIM CITY PLANNL'~IG COMafISSiON
STATE OF CALIi~Gi2NIA )
COUNTY OF (,RANGE ) ss.
CITY ~T' ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Kr<bs, Secretar5~ of the City Planning Cnmmission of the City of Aaeheim, do hereby certifv that
the toregoing resolution wac passed and edopted at a mc~ting of t},e Citq Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
neld on Sep! r_r,:ber 25, i967, at 2:00 o'doc;c P,M„ by .he following vote of the men~'vers thereoF:
AYES: COMM75S?ONERS: Farar,o, Gauer, Herbst. '.:unaa! i, Rowland~
~, I
~,~ ~
9•I I
i~
~
.i
h: ~
.~~ l
'I p
i ~
' •I
i J~
NO'FS: COM:eiSS(ONERS: i'1one.
ALiSENT: COMMI3SIONERS: A11r=d~
kRSTI,:'~It COMh4:=5I0NERSr C;r,;p.
IN WITN~SS ~9iiERE('iF, I hnve hrreun:o set my hend this 5th day o` October, 190?,
RESOLUTIO;I N0. ~!+
R2-A
~~. ~ %~ -
._ % ~ ~_ ~ ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_z.
,
I.e,~__ .: _.. _
_ _-- --' __ .
-'= =-.- _.._ ._. -.~.~.~..~~
_.... T- ---:•~~;.., -
• ' • +' - --
. ._ _ . - +'~+... . . :.:'FT' -`~d
5
r