PC 67-240RESOLUTION NO P~67-2AC
A RESOLUTiON OF THE CITY PLANNING COM611SSION OF THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 972 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Maheim did receive a verified Petition tor Con-
ditionalUse Permitfrom HENRY WAGNER, 975 South Siate College Boulevard, and ARMO CORPORATION,
P.O. Box 309, Anaheim, California 92ri05, Owners; ANN ti1ADISON, 600 South riarbor Bouleva-~,
Anaheim, California 92~05, Agent of certain rea'_ property situated in the City oi AnaheiT, Count
of Orange, State of California, des~ribed a.s the Westerly 345.31 ,`eet of the North one-half of
tha Nc~`.heast quarter o; the Northeast quarter of Section 23, Townshio 4 South, Range 1~ West.
in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana. as oe: map recorded in boor: 5, oage ]0 of h4iscellar,-
~~ eous ~4aps, in the of: ice of the cour,ty recorder of saiJ county
i`
,~
`I ~
; und
WHEREAS, the Ciry Plennfng Commiasion did hold a public hearinQ at the City Hall in the City oE Maheim
on Oc tob er 23, ; 907, ot 2~OC o'clock P.N., notice of said public hearing hoving been duly Qivm
es required by law end ln accordance with the prov3slons of the Maheim Municipal code, CAaptet 18.64, to hear
end conslder evidence fo^ •~:. egeinst eaid proposed conditional use and to investlgate and make Eindings ~nd
recommendntions ln conn~. ~ therewith; and
WHERF.AS, aaid Commission, after due inspection, investi¢etion, and study mede by itaelf and in lta br
half, and eftec due consideretion of all ev.inmce and reporte oEfered at satd hearing, does Eind end determine the
followine facts:
1. That the proposed use ls properly one for which a Condltionel Use Permit Is authorized by this Code,
~c tinn 1~.cG.O<0(2-;l; ].b~.0?0(5); and 1~~ ;2.C50(I-a), to estabiish a 300-roo,n lU5-foo;
hi~i, i~otel cornnlex havino on a:e 'iquor: and a 6-story, 1_jO-i00t high of;ice buildina ano
~ommerciai cor~plex nevino restaurant fa;.ilities witn on-sal> liauor on sub`~:t oronertv.
.. Tnat ti~e proposed use i~ ?ncomoztio!e ~,rith the existinq industriai u~as eetab!is~:eu
in the southeast indusirial area, and ~.a•il! have a deleterious a.`fect on futurc r,'evelooment
of tne remaininy vacant properties ;or inoustrial use ir. this area.
3. That ±he proposed u=e :a~ould be more appropriate in the comrr,er:ia]-recreation ,rea,
since the use is oriented toward the~^e-type hotel-motel, o;;ice and entertainm.er,t i;cilitie=
however, said use would not be in keepina ~raith the establi~hed induetria; cnara~?ei os tne
area, and wuuld ereate a hardship on inoustries in this area by in;ecting a consir.erable
amount oi commercia! C*af~1C.
;. Tnai ev2ry ~:iort shoul:i be made to afford the same prctection to the industria!
areas of ihe ~it}~ of P.naheim as is e.rtenoed to the com!nercial recreztion area, in orcier
that the reputatior established by the City of Anaheim zs being tre top city in the nation
~.vith industrial Growth ~vill not be lost, anci rUtUI'@ indu=tria'_ devc'.op:~:ent wi:l not bc
def erred.
5. That a reoresentative of tn2 Southern Paci;ic Rai.lroad, o~m er of a number o`' '.,-:rae
parcels of iand in th?s area oeing held for inoustrial development, appeared in oppo=ition.
" I CI-D .1_
~ 1
._:~ T
';~ ~
:;~
„
i
~',
I.
i
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEA that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Conditional Use Permit on the basis of the eforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me ~his 2r.d day o.`' Novembez, 1967.
~ ~~-_ ,
/ ,ir~c Z<<- ~z_;'-- -
( CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY~PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTF.ST:
~ ,
- ~ ~ i~Z. /~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I 3 Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution was passed end adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of pnaheim, held on
October 239 1967, , et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Rowland, ''amp.
~
~ NOES: COMhfISSIONERS: None.
I
I ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: hlunyall.
I IN R'ITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ?nd c~ay of ~lovember9 1967.
~; ~
~i ~
,! ~
i ~{
~'
/ ,~~ _ ; ( ~.?Z~ ~. ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANN?NG COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 240
C2-D ,
-2-
~