PC 67-30PC67-30
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 91~ BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Maheim did receive a verified Petition for Conditionel
Use Permitfrom GULF OIL CORPORATION, 1R01 Avenue of the Stars, Los Angeles, Cali:ornia 90067,
Uvners; MICHIELSEN AND ASSOCIATES, 2~0 North Wilshire Avenue, Ar,aheim, California, Agents of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County oi Orange, State oi Californi~,
described in Exnibit "A° attached hereto and referred to herein as thougi; set forth in :ull
~ , ..~
; and
WHEREAS the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on
February 15, 1~67, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by
lew and in accordence with the provisions oEthe Aneheim Municipel code, Chapter 18.64, to hear and consider evidence
for and ageinst seid ptoposed conditional use and to investigate and meke findings and recommmdatians in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf, and
after due consideretion of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find end determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditionel .Use Permit is authorized by this Code, to
wit: SECTION 1R.64,020(3-a) t~ zb:ish a carwash in conjunction ~,vith an existing =_ervice
station.
2. Thet the propoaed use will not adversely affect ;he edjoining land uses and the growth and development of
~ the area in which it ia propoaed to f~ loceted.
~ 3. Thet the size and sha;,,~e of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the
i proposed use in a menner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, sefety, end generel welfare
' oE the Citizens of the City of Meheim.
~ 4. Thet the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental
to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. That no one apoeared in opposition to subject petitior,.
..~ ,
i': A
! ,~l~
.I~~
C ~~ ~~
/
., ,r~~ ~~~
~`_.__' . - ' ' ~ ? ~
__ "" _' '_'_` ~ . .~~~~./~ r .'~L ti~~Y~~ ~~~
r~1 ~ '~ ~ i ~ ' ' - .
-~~~_~ ,~su_•~ r:~e ~:rc: ~rus~ COlll~~c 2131 ~`~-~~'_' ~: ~
~ /,
o~;.•.. - o~F~cc ~ ~~f~.?c~.
Bp.7 \G~i~F+ ~.. .~.. .~~r:~i_' SAtiTA ANA ~~'~1
i'.~~...~ ~.:7~ ~1~ ~ . U O
`'""'~ ~3333 i
, , ~~7. 1';'~.
IiCCC 1i02T ~S ~ 1~66 . ~ ~ ~- .- ' `'~i~i'.tr~JT
~ i~iro-t~r~~~~r
1~'hcn r~• il in~ rcfcr to
f )' o
, Gu'_s Oil Corno:aticn Our~o. 445017
, P.O. Box 540G4, Tcrminal :lnnex
, ~os Angeles, Ca~ifornia 90054
Your No. 6 6 6
,'~-,:tr.: Lyrr. ~i. Parkhurst
- 'I~h~• fullua:in. i.~ a rrpor, of thr ~i~lr tn tL~~ land J~•:r.;i6c•d in your npplication for n 1'olir.y of Tillc Insurnncc, nnd is
tn: ~?c t; iilu~ut !iai~iii:~• and ~~•ithout ohli~atinn ta i~~ur .uch p~~licy. In addition to anp rxci~ptions sliown 6~•r~in, and
m~t r.;~•:~rr:i. ~:~r j~i,lic.r. if i>sw•d, N'III COI1l:lifl COIIt1111017c Al1fI stipul~tions and al~o ~~zcrption.s from its covcragc ns mny
6c rrr~ui.-~•d Ly u~c particular form of policy issu;~d.
llaic„ as oi_ li~CembeT 21 . 196G at 7:30 a.m. _1 ~_(~~~,t.~~~c~L
D1. L:~ssiter, Jr. j- TidcO(}iccr
~',:,;~~:
~ 1
~; ~ i~- U: l. l tr.• ~'~ -. ' Qr r0 n Y1.S~/ 1 v c'.) rt ~ c~ ~fiv ~~ 7.~ S t7 C~ S C/~' F~ ~ l/YI GY~f !i 1~
!
GUL` 0?i, COP~POR.4TI0~' OF CALTFO;2A'IA, a corporation.
~
?~
~~ a I'
1 „a~
, ~~
~~.
~' ' -
~~~
i! ~
i1
Y:.xcc•rtioas:
,...`~~...~. .:::.~.
%::r';~c;~ :'.at oi tliat »ortion of the soutllcast quartc: of: thc sout;i-
c;;st quartc_ oi ~ne soutiu•:es~ qu~~:rter of Scction 12, 'I'ownshir 4
SOU1:!! , i~Cl::n(; 11 1~~CSi. lil i.}1C 12: 3:C!?0 j.05 ~:OyOtCS ~ lA t}1C CltY OL
:1aai~c:t:~,JCot:nty of Orange, S~a~e of California, as per map recorded
'-:~ b~ok 1 p~ ;c l, of Alisccllancoi~s Atsps, in tlie office of. the
ccu;:;:y recorcier cf said county described as follows:
lie;in:~i^~; at ~iie sou~heas~ corner of the southiti~est quarter of said
Sec~icn 12; tiience No:~h 0° 11' 15" l•Jest a~ong the easterly line
ol' '~}ic souL-iii•:cst ~uartcr of said scction, a distance of 203.00
icct; ~hcncc Scu~h 39° 41' 20" R'est narallel ti•ritiz tlie sotrtherly
'_ine o~ saici s~ction 12, a distance o~ 195.00 Eect; thence South
(?° =i.' 15" I:as~ para~lel t•:ith t}:e easterly line of tlie soutliiaest
~. t.:~:-tca• oi' said section, a dis::.:t;lce o~ 203.00 {eet to ti:e southerly
':.~'-e oi said sec-cion; ~hencc Acr~h S9° 41' 20" last alonr s;iid
~~~==~~~-=-Y '-'-I=E, a distance of 195.00 feet to tlic point of bc~inning.
''r:C:~-'s' ~'::-~ .~o'_'c'ic:i condemneu by thc 5tate of California by final
o-:~e: o-_ con~err:acior_, a certified cony oi which titi*as r~corded July
29, _95% ~n uool: 3989 pabe 1G3, Official Records.
a
NON, THEREFORt, BE 1T RESOL,Ytp tMt d~e A~sf~i~ City Plannin~ Coemla~ion doea hercby erent subject
Petltton [or Condition~l U~e P~rmit, upM t11~ f~llyl~ o~~tlon whld~ ~re hsnby found to be a neeesa~ry pretequisite
to the peop~ed we of the subjcet property in ueJ~r M M~r~e the s~fety ~nd 6enerel welfate ot the CitIzens of the
C:ty of M~hd~:
1. 'ihat the sidewal!cs shall be repaired along Dale Avenue, as required by the City
Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of
the City Engineer.
2. That subject property si~a:l be developed substantially in accordance with City
Cou:~cil Metal Building Policy.
3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Ananeim, marked Exhibit Nos. ] and 2, provided,
however, that the carwash shall be relocated to provide additional parking area near the exit
of the carwash for drying and detailing of the washed vehicles.
f,
~
THE FOREGOING RE9QLUTION ia dp~~d and ~ppA~~ yy me this 23rd day of rebruzr~., 1967.
/, ~/'
~C.' ~'G
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
.
~~~~~1,: ~ ~i ~<.
SECRETARY ANAHEibI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUN'fY OF ORANGE ) ss,
CtfY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Kr ebs, ~etary of the City ~Plaanin~ Commia~9aa of the City of Anaheim, du hereby certify that
the fore`oinQ resolution was p~as~d end ~dopted at a mxting of the City Planning Commisaion of the City of Anaheim,
held on February 15~ 1967~ ~t 2:00 o'clodc P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMIIQSSIONERS: :.] lred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Nungal l, RovJland, Camp.
NOES: COMhQSSIONERS: None.
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ^~o~ e.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto aet my hand thIs 23rd day of February, 1907.
~`
~ '
5-.1 ~
RESOLUTION NO. 30
'~ ~~ C~~i
~
L~ ~ '~~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~.i ~~./~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
.'1'
~
I
'- -. ~ ~. ~ ~ - . - -- - "~....a
.. -.. ~ • ~ . ~~~ ~