PC 67-35RESOLUTION NO. PC67-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0.66-67-49 gg pppROVED
~
Q '
~ I
WHEREAS, the ritv Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclessifica-
tionfromHAROLD S. LEi~~' ~~16 East Chestnut, Santa Ana, Cali;ornia 92701, Owner; N~ARK Fi.°.~TOT;E,
1123 West Carsor. Street, Torrance, California 90502, P.gent of certain real proper~y situated
in the City of Anahei:~, County of Orany,e,,-State of California, described Parcel 1: Lot 4 in
Tract No. 403, as per map xe'corded in book 16, page 11 of h",iscellaneou=_ A4aoe, record= of
Orange County, California. Parcel 2s Lot 5 of Tract iJo. 403, as snown on a map r~rorded in ~ook
lo, page 11 of Miscellaneous Maps. rJCCEPTING,THEREFROM the Northerly 36.00 :eet. Lot G of
Tract No. 403, as shown on a map recorded irr book 16, page 11 of Miscelianeous hiaps, records
o. Urange Cour.ty. EXCEPI'ING THEREFROM the Northerly 36.00 feet. ALSO DCCEPTItiG THEREFROM
tl,e following de=cribed land: Beginning at a point in the South line of the IJorth 3o ieet of
said Lot 6 distant easterly 40 feet from the West line of said Lot 6; thence Westerly aloro
said South lina 40.00 :eet to said West line; thence Southerly along said bVest line 20 fp2t, to
a line that is parallel with and distant Southerly 20 feet, mea=_ured at *ight anqles from said
Southerly line; thence Easterly along <_aid parallel line 20 feet; thence hlortheaste:ly to the
ooint of beginning
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
February !5, 1967, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing heving been duly given es required by
lew and in accordence with the provisions af the pnaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence
for and against said proposed reclassificetion and to investigate and make findings and recommendetions in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, caid Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, end study made by itself and in its behalf, and
after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at seid hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes e reclessificetion of the above described property from the R-A, Agr i cu 1 tura 1,
Zone to the G 1, Gener~] Commercial, Zone on Parcel ~Jo. 1 only, to establish a w~l}:-uo
restaurant. ~
2. That the proooeed reclaesification is in con:`ormance with the General Pi;n.
3, That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or desirable (or the orderly end pro-
per developnrent of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relate to the zones end their permitted
uses locelly established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally estab-
lished throughout the community.
5. That the pr~posed reclas=ification of subject orooerty does not require the dedication
and improvement of Lincoln Avenue in accordar~2 vaith the Circulation Element o: the Genera]
Plan.
6. That no one appeared in ooposition to subject petition.
R-A -1-
~
i
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ecESOLVED th~t the Anahcim City Planning"Commission does heceby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Aneheim thet subject Petition for Reclassificetion be approved end, by so doing,
that Title 18-Zoning of the Aneheim Municipel Code be emended to exclude the ebove described property from the
R-A, Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said described property into the C-1, General
Commercial, Zone (Parcel 1) upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a
necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject properi;y in order to preserve the safety
and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the
granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 919.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed ~nd approved by me this 23rd day of February, 1967.
~ ~j ~ ~
~'~i l.~'!~'i`t~' L(~= -~GGl~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSI
pro tem
ATTEST:
J/ <~-~ ~ ~
~L-'?lii:=r.~ J~ ' ~...,_,
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs~ Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Mrheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution wes pessed end adopted ot e meeting of the City Plnnning Commission oEthe City of Anaheim, held on
February 15, 1967, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the fo?lowing vote of the membera thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Mungall, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~amp, Herbst.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my h~nd this 23rd day of Februai•y~ 1967.
l. /-'-`.-~,r. ,~ ~L.=.
SECRET.~RY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 35
R2-A
-2-
,s
.... ;-- ~ - - - .~,~ _ . - _ ._
.._. ~~` ~`~.:
~