PC 67-45RESQLUTION NO..
PC67-45
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF TNE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 1~54 SE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Veriance from
CHARLES R. LARAWAY, 1R37 Greenleaf Avenue, Ar,aheim, California, Cv;ner o: certain real aroparty
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Californiz, de<cribeo a= Lot :dos.
2-7. 10-15, 1+~-23, 26-2R of Tract No. 3095
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
~ebruary 27, 1967, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing heving been duly given as required by
law and in accocdence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear end considet evidence for
and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith;
and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and after due consideration of ell evideace and reports offeredat said heering, does find and determine the following
facts:
1. Thet the petitioner requests e variance Er~m the Aneheim Municipal Code:
S£CI'ION 1R,2fi,050(1-a and b) - h'inimum lot width and minimum lot zraa.
(hii~imum lot width required - 70 : eet; ~'_.`.
`eet prooosed).
ASinimum lot area reouired - ~00 sqcara :cet:
5_5~0 =ouare ieet ;?ropo~ed).
2. That substandard lots v~ould be created settina a orecedent °or simi'.ar reauas~.= rror,:
other established and proposed R-3 deve!ooments.
3. That tne variance request ivas initiateti only after several nal:-lots ir.volveo :vere
sold without the lots being leqally cut.
4. Tnat zonino action<_ should not be the vehicle used to adjudicate ieoal tit:e matter=.
5. That the prooo=ed variance, if approved, could create inaoeyuate yard ar2as *or
r ecreation purposes, Nmich is deemed nece=_sary for miltiple :amiiy residents, t!~ereby
creatinq addir.ior.al demands on the City's public par:: ;acil:ties.
6. 'Inat a previous ~~ariance request .`or substandard lots ~va= denied bv tne
City Council and that under the previous request, said lots were laraer than those present'.v
proposed. -
7. That no one aopeared in oooosition to sub',act ~etition.
,
I
~ V 1-D,
I ~
~'~; `i
~~ 1
~: ~
-1-
~:
~ ,~ -~
~ , s, ~
3~
ij ;
;i
`'~
; -
~
.I.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Variance on the basis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this pth day of PJ,arch, 140~.
7i j ~ _Y ~
C~HAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING~COMMIS ION
ATTEST:
/. ' ~ /
~ , i~ lt: !'-
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OI' ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, . Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
going resolution was pessed end adopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
Februar/ 2?, 1967, at 2:00 o'clock p.M„ by the foilowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: A11red, Farano, Ga;ier, Herbst, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~°~unqa] I .
IN 54ITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereu~to set my hand this 9th day of March, 1~67.
/ i ~=,
- 1'J:
SECRETARY pNAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 45
V 2-D
-z-
~};
~~ ~A
b
r,