PC 67-46RESOLUTION NO
PC67-46
A RESOLlJTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COINMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITIdN FOR VARIANCE NO. 1R55 BE GRANTED
~ WHEREAS, the City Planning Commisseon of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Veriance
from tJEIGHBORS Rti~CFiES (a partnership), 633 Dlorth Pine Way, Anaheim, Cali:ornia, Owners; JOSEPH
C. AND ELIZAL'cTH M. NEIGHBORS, ci33 North Pine Way, Anaheim, California, Agents of certain real
orooerty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Cali`ornia, de=_cribed as
~. _ Lot Nos. 5 and 6 of Tract No. 4a3
,F.iKFa~;
'i
~If '
}~ ~
~
; and
t '~ -
f.~
s{
'.F'i
:. -
f' a
~ •i
. ~ ~x
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold n public hearing et the City Hell in the City of Anaheim
on r ebruary 27, 1°67, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearirtg having been duly given es required
by lew and in accordance with the proviaions oE the Maheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.68,to hear and consider
evidence for end against said proposed varienee and to investi¢ete and meke findings and recommendations in connec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commissinn, after due inspection, investigation, end study made by itself end in its behalf,
and aEter due eonsiderstlon of all eviflence end reports offered at said heering, does find and determine the following
facts;
1. Thet the petitioner requests e variance from the Anaheim Municipal Code: to permit t:~e exoon=_ ion o` a
oool su~ply facility as iollows:
SECTIO'rl ]R.40.070(4-f) - Required parking. (?4 soaces r2quired; 1.0.soace~ nroco~ed).
SECTION 1R.40.070(?) - St_~dard trasn storace area. (i required; none oroposeo).
SECTION 1R.40.070(3) - Screen landscapin~. (3-ioot lanoscaoed strio reau=red; none
oroooseo~.
SECTIO'd 1R.40.0?0(6) - Landscanino of par}:inq area. (~ recuired; none oropoec<i).
2. That there ere exceptionel or extreordinary circumstences or conditions applicable to the property involved
or :o the intended use of the property that do not epply generelly to the property or cless of use in ttse seme vicinity
and zone.
3. That the :equested variance is necessery for the preservetion and enjoyment of a substential propeRy right
possessed by other property in the seme vicinity end zone, end denied to the ptoperty in question.
4. That the requested variance will not be meterially detrimental to the public welfate oc injurious to the prop-
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is loceted.
5. That trash pic:: up is presently accornnlished by :vay o.` iront curb pickup, sinc~
there is no seconciary acces= to the rear o: the propei•ty.
6. Tnat waiv=rs involved are technical waivers due to the iact tnat these shopoing
facilities developed at a time when site development standards were not required; and tnat
the oroposed storaoe facility wili improve the apoea:ance o` the existinc buildinu without
creating an aporeciable r.eed for additional oorb:ing.
'7. That no one aopeared in oooosition to subject oetition.
V 1-G -1-
. , _ ~
s
t,
F
~
NOW, THEREP'ORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petiti~~n for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
1. ':hat this variance is granted subject to the completion of Re~lassification
No. 62-63-41.
2. That the owners of subjec± property shall pay to the City oi Ar.aneim the sum of $2.00
oer front foot along ia °alma A~renue, for street lighting ourposes.
3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of F~naheim the sum of 15Q
oer front foot along La Pal~na Av?nue, for tree planting purooses.
4. That the sidewalks sha11 be reoaired along La Paima Avenue, as required by the City
Engineer and in accordance with standa-rd plans and specifications on file in the o°:ice of
the City Engineer, prior to final building and zoning inspections.
5. That Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior ;o tt~e
time that the Building °ermit is issued or w:thin a period of 1~0 days from date hereof,
whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Commis=_ic~ or City Council may orant.
6. That subject property shall be developeo substantially in accordance with plan= and
soecifications on file with thz City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, orovided,
however, that the front of the proposed enclosure shall have a facade which will be
c~molimentary to the adjoining commercial structures.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this 9 h day of March, 196?.
~ ~ %f ~~~ ~-, ~
C~IAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMM SSION
P.'.TEST:
%
/,4 . ..~f;i. ~ , %
L
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORAVGE ) ss.
CITY C'F ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ ~,;.!Secretary of the City Ptanning Commission of the City oE Anaheim, do hereby certify that the Eore-
going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
February 27, 1967, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Camp.
NOES: CO~~:AtISSI~NERS: Non e.
ABSENT: COM1iMISSIONERS: "~ungal i, Rov~land.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 9th da~- of A1arc`:, ] 967.
~ ~~. . . >2- _ . .
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMM1tISSION
RESOLUTION NO. G6
V2-G 2_
a
i ~