Loading...
PC 67-54 RESOLUTION NO. P~6~-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING CQMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITION FOR !'~NDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. `'_'~_ BE DENIED ' WHEREAS, tl:~ City Planning Commission oi the City of Anaheim did receive e verified Petition for Conditiunal UsePermitfrom WILLIAN SHO~".;AKER, ~I' AL, 1R00 ^l. Psgyle Avenue, Lo=. P.r.geles, Ca:`.rorniz 900~~s, Owners; HP.RRY KidISELY, '.'4] South Euclid, Suite B, Anaheim, Cali:ornia, Agent o: certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County o` Orange, State oi Cali.`orr.ia, descrioed as the Dlortn 203.00 •°2Et of the west 207.00 feet o' the northeast quarter of the nortnea.=.t cuarter of section 21, Townshio A South Range 10 West, in the Rancho San Jua~ Cajon de S~r'r.a Ana, as _ par mao recorded in book 5i caae :0 of N:i=ceilaneous hfaps, in tne off'ce of the Co.~'~• recoroer ~ _ ~~ of said county. ; end WFjEF.EAS the City Planning Commission did liold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on hiar_h 1~, 190'1, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said ublic hearin havin been dul P g g y given as required by law and in eccordance with the provisions of the Meheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.64, to hear and consider evidence for end against said proposed conditionel use and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WNEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, end study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of ell evidence end reports offered ei said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. 'Chat the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditiona! Use Permit is authorized by this Code, to wit: Section 1~.6~.02U(.',-e) to permit estab;~=_nmant of a=_ervice station on ~cbiect uro~ert~;. 2. That th2 proposed use tivil] adversely affect ao`,oining re=_idential lar,d csae, sinc~ !ignt, ooors, noises, ar.d 'nours of operztion, wnich are inherent ~vitn service =_t~;ior.= are d~•eined detrimental to the paace, nea]?n, sa.°aty, and qenera] v~e1.°are o° these re~i::,^+~. 3. TF;at al.though tha Genzrai ?]an and City Counci? policy rzgardinq the •-.o ,•~r i;'. re:rea~ien area irdicates subject property is :vithin the C-R ~rea yeneral bounra~~';:_, o~d F; -:: ~~ en nrdinance e=_tablishing a C-R. Commercia] Recreation, Zone :•:ii'. b2cor.;e e`,,. ~_,~ ~!~o,~,:~~, thi<_ doe= ^ot necessari:y indicate tna~ =_ub'ert ~rooert•,~ =hould be zutomzti-a'.:y ~i:~en C-R Zoning, =_ince :and u~es establisheo in cioee proximi;:y snould be oiver, _onsioeratio•~. +n< reclassification o: subject nroperty. ~ ~ 4. That tra:`ic along 'Na':nut Street ~~;i:i i.n:rease thu= creati^a iraf_~~ ~azaros to the elberly pe*=ons who reside in the home at t5e r.orthwest cornar o.' 3~11 Road and 'JJa'^ut S~reet, who may us~ the walks and s±r~ets. 5. ihat tne Commissior. deems tnat approva: of subiact petition could be construad a= committing the Commission to pre-zor,ino subject proaerty ~t .., ~ time as the C-R Zone necame eifective. o. That 3 person= appeareo, one representing tne L.:±::~ra^ :iome loc atec. at the ~ort^r:•~=t corner of this intersection, and 2 pei•sons ere=_entad patit;ons sicned by 43 ~erso~~ al; .,, o~po=i~ion to sub;e:t petition. Cl-D _1_ .~-.~ _ - _ ---- ~• ~ , ~ - ------ ---~-.d - --- . ~ ,n~ ;a!,,1y. e .E~ '1 ~ ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit on the basis of the aforemeationed findings. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me th' ~ 23rd day of March, 1 ~6~. ~, ~~ J L. ..-~ , _-z i ~ CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNfNG COMM SION ATTEST: `~ '~.` ~, ~lt, ~~ - SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore- going resolution wes passed and adopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of qnaheim, held on March 13, 1957, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the Eollowing vote of the members thereof: i AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Fatano, Gauer, Herb= ~ I t, G,unoall, Rowland. i NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Camp. ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None. ~I W WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of March, 196?. ~' ~ . ~ . ~ ~ 7- • "1 , r= x~ ~~C_~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANI3ING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 54 C2-D -2- ,?i '~ ` ~ i ~~ ,{ ~ I r i ' r % r ~ !. .._ ~ '~---~"_ ~ --- • ~ - -- • ~ j . .. ~ NY: . ~...~.... .: T'~s . J ' E