PC 67-97PC67-97
RESOLUTION N0.
, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 1875 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive e verified Petition Eor Variance from
LEE VAUGHAN, 1731 A" South Euclid, Anaheim, California 92802, Owner; JAMES HODGES, 1731 A" South
Euclid, Anaheim, Cali:ornia 92802, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
~ County of Orange, State or California, describcd that portion oi the Northeast quarter of the Nrn~th-
a r,..,~Vi~ east quarter of S ection 1°, Township 4 South, Ranqe 10 West, S.B.B. 8 M. BEGINNING at a point in t~r~
i East Line of =aid Section 19, Soutn (P 27' West 600.00 feet -rom the Nortneast corner of said
~~t~ ~ section, said point oeing the Southeast corner of the land described in the deed to Earl Sinoleton
and wife, recorde~J May ]6, 19a9 in book ]A43, page 420 of Of*icial Records; thence from said point
~,~~ o; beg inning South 890~4'40" 6Vest alonq the South line of =aid land conveyed to Earl Sinaleton and
l; wife 175.00 feet; thence PJorth Oo?7' East along tne West !ine of said Singleton land ]00.00 :eet:
E thence IJorth $9°54'40" Eas't oara:le! to tiie South ].ine o* said land or" Sinoletun, 175.00 reet
~j to the East line thereo:; thence Sout^ 0°~"' P~e=_t alono saio East iine, ]00 feet to the ooint of
~
beainning
~ ~ ; end
i -
; ~ WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hail in the City of Anaheim on
~ i May 8~ 1967, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice oE said pubiic hearing having been duly given es required by
.,~ law aad in accordance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for
and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith;
~~ i and
` ~ WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, end study made by itself and in its behalf,
; and after due consideration of all evidence and repods offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following
i ; facts:
, 1. That the petitioner requests a veriance from the Anaheim Municipal Code *_o p2rmit tne expansion o.`
,~ an existing restaurant with ~xaiv?r of:
?j SECTIOti !3.40.070~3-a) - A~aximum permitted building he:ont in relation to set-
;;i back adjacent to an R-1 Zone. (16-foot setback re-
quired ;or an 8-foot roo: heignt as its lowest po:nt -
;! _ 5-foot setbac:K proposed).
!! _ 2. That tne neiqnt oi the prooosed additior, to an existing structure would i~ave a
E~
~ harm`u1 ei.`ec`. on tne quality of the single :aR~ily residential enviro!~mert estab-
:j lished to the west of subject property.
' 3e TFat tnerr are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions appli-
cable to tne prope*ty involved or to the intended use o,` tne property ti~at do not
apoly generally to tne oroperty or class of use in the same ~~icinity and zene.
4. That tne requested variance is not necessary for tne preservation and en~oyment
of a suhstantial property rignt possessed by otner property in tne same ~~ic;rity
and zone, and denied to the propert~ in question.
5o That the requested •rar_ar.ce will he materially dFtrime^tal to the publ:c wel-
~ fare or injurious to ti:e property or impro~~ements in such vicinity and zone in
, i whic:^. ~ne oreperty is located,
R' 6. Tnat tne petitioner has not proven that a hards!~ip would exist ii sub;ect peti-
~ tion is not aranted.
7. That no one appeared in opposition to sub;ect petitior.
V1-D
-1-
.~* ~I:
" V
!: i~~~
!` ~ ~
~~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Variance on the basis of the aforementioned findings.
; j THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 18th day o: May9 1967~
~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANN G COMMISSION
' ' ATTEST:
~1~ '
;I ,
i . .
.I ~G12?"L. ~~!Z~ ~4~
~
: j SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
,j STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
:~ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
; CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I I~ Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby cedify thet the fore-
~ i going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
~ ~ i May 8 y i96?9 at 2:00 o'clock p,(~„ by the following vote a[ the members thereof:
~ ~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED FARANO F ^
, , , H~RRST, MUNGALL, POWLp,ND, CAMP.
, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
I
'
~ ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
~ ;
`I •. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 18th day o.` May~ 196?~
i
i
i
y ; /_
~ I r~Z '?- z z C ~ ~Z , ' ~`~
L
`' ` SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~I
~'~ RESOLUTION N0.97
,:~; V2-D _2.
:i
', ~
~
~i ,
rj a
.•,~I ~
i
~
G