PC 68-10~ +
RESOLUTION N0~ PCG8--;.0
A RE90LUT,ON O!' ~4{E ~y pI,AKNp~d Cp1~QSS~pN OF THE CYTY OF ANAHEIII
THAT i~E7]770N FOR COl1DITiONAI, USE PERffIT 990 gg p~~ED
•FIEREe1S, tbe City Pl~nnfa~ Coemis~ion of tb~ City o( Aoah~lm dld rsc~ive ~ vKiHed P~titloa [or Con-
ditlond U~e Pen~lt feo~ A. ?,,, SHAMkLEY, 310 Rim Road, El Faso, Texas 79902; Q,n e: ; L'~;, LeE
REALTY, 1COR South Anaheim Bouievardy Anaheim, Cal~:'ornia 92Fj05., Agent or :e-tain :eal
property situated in the Ciiy of Anaheim, County o: O:ar.qe, State of Calit'ornia, des~ribed
as Lot 2 0: Tract Ao. 1379, as oer mao reco:ded ir, book ~3 pages 6 ar.d 7 of Misce~lar.eous
M:,ps, in tne office of the County Recorder or' said county
,
;f
~!
,
I
~ i
, ! :
~I
i
; ~nd
MHERE/~S, tie Clry Flo~ala~ Co~ls~ioe ~id bold a psaflc 6Nria~ ot tb~ Clty Hc11 in the Clt~ ~f Msheim
on January 3, 1968, d 2:00 o'eloeic P.II., eotta o{ ~dd ~y~ie hs~rin~ hwin~ bo~n dnly dvm
~s rsqulnd by l~w ~ed la ~coot~e~ wltS tb~ pov~tlor ot th~ Auss1~ lhricipal ood~~ C~~pt~r ?t.64, to luar
r-d, aw~id~r ~vld~me~ (ot ee/ ~~lut said yxvroNd ao~!ltlca~l w~sd to lavwtl~ate ~ad ak~ :'~diep ~nd
~+.roanrl~tlma ln eom~etlo~ diar~wlti; ~od
~~tens, .da co.su.-oe, a[+vJ aw m~y.ec~,,. ~wes~~.um, ~d ~trdy ~~ by ltwif r~d le~ Ib be-
_ bd[, W~[!h in~ caaddvnUaa oL di widMe~ ~od n~ort~ o~»d ~t ~ald hweln=, doas dnd ~ drt~rdee !he
IoUowla~ Q~ets:
L Th~t th~ p~yA uee do p~~lr ase 6x wll~ ~ Cosdltdond UM Pae~it l~ wtlwHa~d by thla Cod~, Section
:8,04.020(3-g) to .vit: establish an automatic car wash vrith incidental sale of gasoline on
subject prooerty.
2. That the proposed usa wi11 adve:sely a:fect the adjoining land uses and the growth
and dev~lopment of the a.rea in which it is proposed to be located.
3. That the proposed use at the intersection of a orimary and a local street v:ould
inject commercial traffic into the residential are~ to the east.
4. 'Ihat a more compatible comme:cial use for the size of lot, such as a commercial-
professional office build~no would have a less deleterious effect on the residential
integrity to the ezst than the proposed extremely heavy commercial use.
5. That three persons aopeared in ooposition.
*
.,~lx J .' CI-D .1_
n
5
t
~ ~ ~
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Conditional Uae Permit on the basis of the eforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me.t is llth day of January9 1968,
/
~ ~LLL-l.L~ ~i '
(CHAIRh1AN ANAHEIM CTTY PLANNING C MMISSION
~"` ~ ATTEST:
~~`~ ~ ~~l L~2- ~~.,~~c~_/
•~ ; SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
,a
: ~ ;J STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
;, i COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
:i ' } CITY OF ANAHEIM )
1 I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
,~ going resolution was passed and adopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of pnaheim, held on
~ January 3~ 1968~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
:~ I AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Rowland.
NOES: ~OMMISSIONF_RS: ~aTpa
f AS None.
~~ , ~`~BSr'~~T~ ~A1N~ISS ONFt2S: Farano.
i
~ ~% IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 1?th day of January~ 1968.
1 ~
~
~~~2F~/~.~M :
I' SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RE.SOLUTION NO. 10
•I ~- C2-D _2_
.,~ ~ i
~ ~~ ~'
¢ r
~ ,