PC 68-121{
.
RESOLUTION N0, p~68-121
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 19~5 _ gE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Variance
from GODFREY L. GOGERTY, 243 South Walnut Street, Newport Beach, California 92660, Owner; RONNIE
H. FRECK, 1314 North Lemon Street, Anaheim, Cal~fornia 92801, Agent of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of OrangeyState of Cali:ornia, described as Lot Nos. 5, 6,
and 7 of Tract No, 373-Block A
,i
i~
t;~ y ~
=, ~~
`~
~
i i
: l
I
~
, \,I
•.I
,' 'i
i
i
i
` I
'~I -
.
. ~
i
_~I
~ :-.
~
E.s
~ .k.i .
~ .-iL.
. ~._:~.~:I
' . ~.. .~ ~
'. ' f `
`'i1 I ~
~``l~
-ti ,
, •~i` J
!~
t
_ `
~~`~~
~ -`r~,
; and
NHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on hiay 6~ 1968~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required
by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68,to hear and consider
evidence for and dgainst said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connec-
tion therewith; and
{VHEREAS, said Commissinn, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the foliowing
facts:
1. That the petitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim Municipal Code as follows, to permit the
expansion af an existing, non-conforming use to construct a new automobile showroom:
SECTION 18.44.J:0 - Permitted uses in the C-~ Zon~. (T~;; • ~•
of subject ro ert is not " E^~s,,~rg anu proposed i.se
P P y permitted as a matter of r?ght in this
zone).
2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstences or conditions app(icable to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the prope:!y or class of use in the same vicinity
and zone.
3. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substential property right
possessed by other property in the seme vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welEare or injurious to the prop-
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
5. That subject property has been in use as an automobile sales facility for approximately
20 years, as have a number of other parcels in this area, and that new construction along Anaheim
Boulevard can do nothing but improve the general apoea:ance of subject prooerty and the area
as a whole.
1
,,- k~ 4
~'~ ~
~ I
_ ~
~
i
, :\I
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that tke Anaheim City Plenaing Commissioa does hereby grent subject
Petltion for Varience, upon the followIn` conditions which are hereby fowd to be a neceseary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject prope:ty ln order to preserve the safety and general welfare oE the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim:
1. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15~ per
front foot along Anaheim Boulevard, for tree planting purposes.
2. ihat trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file
, with the office of the Director of Public Works.
3. That any air-conditionina facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view and
the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes.
4. That all exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from abutting property
lines.
5. That Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to tne time that the
Building Permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs
first, or uch further time as the Commission or City Council may grant.
6. That an amount of landscaping equivalent to~the normally required 3-foot planter strip
adjacent to the Anaheim Boulevard right-•of-way plus 2~ of the interior parking area shall be
provided in some manner on the site, which landscaping shall be subject to the approval of the
Development Services Department.
7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marhed £xhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3, provided that
all structures, including roof overhangs, shall be a minimum of 40 f eet from the centerline of
: Anaheim Boulevard, and further provided that subject property shall be landscaped in accordance
with Condition No. 6 above.
8, That Condition Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 6, above mentioned, shall be comolied with prior to
' final building and zoning inspections.
?H~ FORECiO~iCi 1tBMiLiT'319if ts il~od asd ~pp~v~ed by ~ this , 16th day of May, 1968.
./`, . ". / %..1 ; ~.
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL ING COM ISSION
ATTEST:
~ i r ..
/..~~~-a-~ ~.; ~ ~'~Z ~ ,/
SECRETARY ANAHEUN CITY ?LADO1pIG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORPIIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) u.
' CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, AM Krebs~ Secretary of the City Pl~nning Commissioa of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foresoing resolution was p~ssed ~nd adopted at a meeting of the City Plsnning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
. hetd on May 6~ i96°9 at 2:00 o'clock P.M.~ by the following vote o~ the members thereof:
AYES: COMAiI6SS0i~tERS: Allred, Gauer, Herbst, ~~1unga~ 1, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: C03aMI3SiONERS: None.
AHSENT: COAfiIISS10lIERS: Faranoe
i "
'J":'~ I
: ~ ~'
~`i.. : `
%' - R
: ,j3'
x'~
: ~a.~
~t:
-
~
~ `,';
~
i '~
„`t
IN WITNL~SS WiiEREOF, I h~ve ha~unto set my hand chia 16th day o_° May, 1968.
RESOLU?ION N0. 121
V2-G
L.%L- Y Z- ~ l.' ~~ ~.~
~/
SECRETARY ANAHEIk CITY PLANNING COM6fISSION
-a-
~
•`
~