PC 68-123~ , .
, i
RESOLUTION N0. P~68-123
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICAT?ON N0. 67-68-74 aE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclassifice-
~ tionfrom WEST ANAHEIM CHURCH OF THE NAZAREN~, 511 South Loara Street, Anaheim, California 92802,
,r„~p.~,~ Owner; J. W. MC MICHA£L, 469 "A" West Valencia Drive, Fullerton, California 92632, Agent of
~ I ;*; certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
.`~ f ; described as That y P P
~S portion of Lot 14 of Helen and Lynch's Subdivision as er ma recoxded in book
,\,.~, ;': 442, page 158 of Deeds, in the office of the county recorder of Los Angeles9 County, the southerly
1. line of said lot 14 being the northesly line of Tract No. 2381, as shown on the map recorded in
~ ' book 69 page 15 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the county recorder of said county,
:~~`I ~`;~ Beginning at the intersection of the easterly prolongation of the North line of said Tract t4oo
2381 with the center line of Loara Street, as shown on said nap; thence North Oo 13' 30" West
.: 1 166.~5 feet a.long said center line; thence South 89~ 16' 04" West 385.22 feet arall
~ North line to the East line of lot 18 of Tract No. 3673 as p el with said
;I• of Miscellaneous Maps; thence South 0~ 18' 00" East to the southeastrcornerdofnLot~161of sa'9id 13
;~ Tract No, 3673; thence North 69~ 16' 04" East 385.00 feet to the point of beginning
_ ~I i
, I
~
` ,i
~
,
i
i
.,
; and
``' I WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
~ ~ M~y Fj, tcJ~g~ d~ 2;00 dclock P.M. notice of seid public hearing heving been duly given es required by
]ew and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear end consider evidence
:.- I - far and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and recommendetions in connection
therewith; and
~
~ WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf, end
~ after due consideration of ell evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
'I
" 1 1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the above described property from the R-A, tigricultural~
, ~ Zone to the R-2-5000, One Family, Zone to subdivide sub'ect
;.:I 2. That it is determined that sub'ect ~ Property into 9 R-2-5000 zonP~i lots.
~ residential densities greater than low density;~howevers therscopetoffthedproposednreclassi-
~ fic'ation does not warrant an amendment to the General Plan at tne present time, but its re-
I lationship to the General Plan symbol will be considered at the next annual review.
i
,: ,
I '
~ 3. That the proposed reclassificetion of subject property is necessary end/or desireble (or the orderly end pro-
I per developnsent of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassificetion of subject property does properly relete to the zones and their permitted
uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones end their permitted uses generally estab-
lished throughout the community.
;;''~ 5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the dedication and
';7y?,~ improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan,
~_:., due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the intensification of
~ _ ' land use.
~ ,.~ ~ '
r
~ %~ _
?:~: i ~
i ~; * .
~~ ~;~~ ~ i
~°,J ~.
_~ ~
, ~ R-A _1_ ~
~~r
y:~~ ~r
~~ ~ ~ . . ......r:ni, .... _ ~ ~ ~ . - o...,,,~
~~t ] r' . r~1::G~PF=-
~~i ~
~~, ~ ~
-.;~;:.: .,
~. ~
.+
, .~ ~
NOiV~ THER6fOit~, !t !7 RY.'OI.VtD tl~t tf~ AMhMw (xf,y lyr~iK Co~aL~~ dow hrr~er ncommend
to th~ City Cowocil of tM Cltr ot Aad~ y~ ~~ Pet~io~ tat Mciarl~o~iia~ Y~ ap~wv~d Mi, by w doiab
thst Tltls 18-2c~i~ ot tk~ A~~iw Mr~ici~al Coie b~ ~e~abd 1~ uttl~ t~s ~Mw ~IMCdi~ poHtty fam the
R-A, Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said described property int.o the R-2~500d, One
Family, Zone upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite
to the proposed use of subject propPxty in orcier to preserve the safety and general welfare of
the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and re-
corded in the office of the Orange County Recorr~er.
i`.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTiON is sittted and approved by me this ,iotn day of May, 1968.
~
~
.~~ z ' i
CHAIRMAN ANAt{gIM CITY PLANNING COMM SION
ATTEST:
~
,',~ , „~
~ i '',;
w
,:
;~
f
ri
~~
J// ~~
. ~L' ?'V-7'~Z-~ ~~~~~ /
SECRETARY ANAHEIIA CITY PLANN}NG COMMISSiON
~ ;,
~,
f ;.
r {y,;.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secret
ary oE the City Plrnnin~ Commis~ion oi the City of Maheim, do hereby certify that
4
the forogoing resolrtion was peea~d ~yd adopted at ~ meeting of the Ci4y PSannina Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on May 6, 1968~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members the~eof:
AYES: COI~MISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Herbst, Alungall, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: ~O~ytg~g~; None.
AHSENT: COhq1I3SiQNERS: Farano.
FN WITNESS WHEREOF, I luve ~~redato ~et my hand this 16th day of May, 1968.
~'
I -::
~
i `i
; 't
~-:
'w
~
~
a
~+i 1~y
;~
i,`.
RESOLUTION N0. 123
R2-A
,*'~+v~.,,.:~..
G'~ 1'Z.-"~ Z.'' / j~2c, z~ ~, ..
SECRETARY ANAHEII( CiTY PLANNHdG COMMISSION
-~-
~
~
\