PC 68-131
i
~4
iS
~. ~i '
i
~
i '
~.
, ~
RESOLUTION N0. ~~68-131
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1978 gE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did initiate a verif ied Petition for
Variance on certain real oroperty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, Stnte o~
CaliFornia, described as prooosed Tract No. 6603, being a subdivision of the South one-half of the
Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 13, To,vnship 4 South, Range 1? West, in the
Rancho Los Coyotes, as sho~rm on a Map recorded in Bonk 51, oage 11 of Miscellaneous hlaps, records
of Oranqe County. Excepting therefrom that nortion lying casterly of the lNesterly ii^~ nf Tract
IJo, 2632, as shown on a Map .recorded in Book 119, pages 26 and 2~ of itiiiscellaneous ~~1~os. Also
excepting therefrom that portion lying idortherly of the Southerly ?ine of that ?3.00 *oot strip
rt conveyed to the Orange County Flood Control Control District by deed recorded Novemi~Er ~, 1959
~, in Book 4991, oage 341 of Official Records. `
Proqertv Owner
LaRoy Turner
305 Pd. State College elvd.
Fullerton, Ca1i`_ 92631 ; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at thc City Hetl in the City of Anaheim on
May 20, 1968y at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as required by
law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal C~de, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for
and against ~aid proposed variance end to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith;
end
;i
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, end study made by itself and in its behalf,
and efler due consideration of a(1 evidence and reports offered at seid heoring, does find and detecmine the following
facts:
1. Thatthe Piannin9 Commission proposes variances from the F.na:^.eim ~'.unicipal Code as follows:
to permit :..~ subdivision of subjuct property into 14 R-1, Zoned :ots:
_ ~
~~
~ -
~
~ . I
i
•i
SECTIOP! 18.24.030(1) - i~iinimum required fro~n.~t y~ara {25 feet reouired; ~,~zriabie
of 20-25 f eet prooosed).
SEGTIO,ti' 18.08.550 - Defi~ition of lot width on a cul-de-sac (60 feet required;
variable svidths :rom 37 fAAt to 57 feet proposed).
SECTIOi. 18.24,030~4_a~ - hiinimum reauired lot aren (7200 sauare feet recuired; 5000
to =~~ sauare ieet oroposed). -
2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstanc;es or conditions aoolicable to
the property ir.;o~ve.+ or to the i~t?r7e:i use or tne c:oaacty that _~o not appiy
generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
3. That the requested variance is necessary for the oreservation and enjoyment of a
subsiantial property righ': possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and denie~:
to the property in question.
4, That the requested variance svi11 not be materially detrimental to the public ~a~el:are
or injurious to the property or improvemen±s in such vicinity and zone in which the nroperty
is located.
5. That the size and shape of subject oroperty would make it extremely di`ficu:t to develor.
as a standard R-1 subdi•~ision with 7200 square Foot lots, tt.ereiore, tne Conmission initiated
sub;ect petition to wa~ve the lot area, lot ~vidth and front yard requi.rements of the R-1 Zone
in order that subject property could be develoaed with single family zoned lots.
6. That since the Planning Comr,iission recommended to the City Council that sub;ect property
be rerlassified to the R-1 Zone and that the General Plan Amendment, proposing low-medium density
for area, be denied; and further, since ~ubject oroperty is considered to be a hardshio oarcel,
the variance orocedure is deemed to be tne most apprcoriat~ rr:ethod by v~hich subject proper~y
may be developed.
V l-
1-
~
~ ~
.
' ,~ i
NOW, THEREcORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Plenning Commission does hereby grant subject
PetitIon for Vori~nce, upon the followIng conditions which are hereby found to be a neceasery prerequisite to fhe pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety end general welfere ot the Citizens of the City of
Aneheim:
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification ~~o. 67-b8-72.
2. That a Final Tract Map of subjer.t nroperty be approved by the City ~ouncil and recordao
in the office of the Orange County Recorder.
3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance wi±h plans and
specifications on File with the City of Anaheim.
r
ic' ~4
i~:. j ;
1
I
`: a
~: ~' -
; ~\i
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end eppcoved by me L'~ ~ 31st d~y of t~lay, 1968.
~ /
~ ~ / l
- ~C AIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL, NNING COMMISSION
;y ~
ATTEST:
~i~~Zt~i~J / ~~ LG~I/'Q/
'~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sa,
~ CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I ~ I, Ann Krebs,
f Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution wes passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission o( the City of Anaheim,
held on May 20, 1968, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
~~ ' AYES: COMNfISSiONERS: Allred, Farano, G,~~,:e: , Herbst, Mungall, Rowland, Camo.
~~~ i: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
i
I! r ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~~ton e.
I
,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend ±his 31st day of May, 1968.
SECRETARY ANAHEtM CITY PLANN[NG COMMISSION
i
RESOLUTION NO. 131
' V2-G _2.
~
~
~ '
.. ,
.,:
„ .!
,.. , ` ~
.ry.. . _
~~,' '"~''a.st ~""'..~ ., ___~... -
~ . i . +w. -,~'t.~.
-~,~' - -- . r .
~~,,.. ~
~"