PC 68-139. ~ `
~. ~ •
RESOLUTION NO. p~68-139
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CtT;~ COUNCIL O 6~'HE CITy OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETTTION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. b~ 85 BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of thr. City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclessifica-
tionfrom G. L. HARBOUR, 4500 Orrington .°.oad, Corona Del Mar, California 92625, Owner; WILLIAM £,
SWANK, 224 Town and Country, Orange, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Califo:nia, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto
and referred to herein as though set `orth in full
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on
hlay 20, 1968, at 2:OU o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as required by
law and in accordance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence
for end against said proposed reclessificetion end to investigate and meke findings and recemmendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, and study mede by itself and in its behalf, and
efter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered et said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassificetion of the above described property from the R-A~ Agricultural~
~one to ihe R-;, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to establish a 15-unit planned resiclentia:
development on subject property.
2. That the plans for the proposed developm~nt indicate that the density would be within
that permitted under the R-2, Multiple Family Residentlal, Zone, ~herefore the Commission does
densityrvouldebe moreahomogeneousMvith~theFlowidensityeresidential developmentstohtheaeastsand
south.
3. Tnat the Commission further deems that the R-2, Multiple Family Residential, Zone is
more aporopriate for subject orooerty and hereby recommends to the City Council that subject
proper4y ThatetheSSCOpeaof~theeoropose1d1reclassificatRon,diftapp'rovede~does not warrant an amencF
ment to the General Plan at the present time, hawever, its relationship to the General Plan
symbol will be considered at the next an~~;;ai review.
~
5. That the pcoposed ceclassificetion of subject property is necessery and/or desirable for the orderly end pro-
per developncent of tne community.
b• Thet the proposed reclassification of subject property daes properly relate to the zones and their permitted
uses locally esteblished in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally estab-
lished throughout the community.
7. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the dedication and
imorovement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan,
due to the anticipated increase in traffic ivhich will be generated by the intensification of
land use.
8. That one person appeared, representing six persons present in the Council Chamber, and
a petition signed by 46 oersons was presented, all in opposition to subject petition.
R-A
-1-
~
~
~
~
'r ~~ . ~ili Swank
224 Town 3; Countr
- Orar,~e, Calii . y_.~68
L~21 $:il: . ..
~-
~ :~
T;:~ ie;;ai descrip~ion for L-l~a~ certain 1.475 acre ~~arc,:i or, ;,he
Na'r~n sida of 3urton Street, 661.23 feet 4Jest of Acacia S~re~~,
bou;,ciad on the North by the Orangc County rlood Cnannei, is as
~~ oilows : •
i
, I ~ T~~a~ po~tion of the frac~ional NorthU~est ~uarter oi Sec~~.or, 2,
; ~ ^oti•~ ;shi~ 4 South, Range 10 l~lest, in the nancho Sar. Juun Cajo :
; da Santa Ana, in tne City of Anaheim, County of Oran~e, Sta~e
o: California, as shown.on ~ map thereof recordcd ~n oook 5i,
' ~a;;~ 10, Niiscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County,
~ aascribed as £ollows;
I ~
': I ,D~~iP11~1Cie 8i. tne South~•rest CO'l(lCY' Oi t(lG' ,:,$St On@-Ilali Oi ~;li:
:'•I ~ast one-hali of' tne frac~ional Nor~hwest quarter o; saio Secc.on
~ ~~ i;nence vorth 89° 79~ 45~~ ?~j@S~ 110175 ~~'1G' SOLIi,C1 11Y7C Ji tri~
~ - :;G'l~htiV@S`i, one-quarte.^ Of Sc1;.d S2C1;lOC1 ?~ Toi•~nsnip 4 jOU~i~~ ic't ;~j'::
~ - 10 ~~iest a distance o: 228.03 feet to the Soutneast co~nei~ of ~r~~;
' _~na d~scri~ed in Deed to the State o~ Cali~pornia, recoroud
~ ~ ;~;a-rcn 19, 1959, in boo:t 4632, page 1S1 of Ol11Cl~Z1 Recoro~; t;,ei:c~
..;
, i ~ a~or~ L-ne boundary oi said land to the S~ate of C~tlifornia, Ln::
:c~i0141~i~ courses ar,d distances: Nortn 0° 00' 15" EasL 2;.)7 faoL-
~ ! ;,o L'ne '~e~inning of a curve concave.Nortnerly havin~ a rao~uc o~
, ~~, :
i"~ ?; 3~.00 ~aeL-, a radial line tnrougn said poin~ bears Soutn 0° G~'
! ? 7~~ ~~~v'S~~ tnence l•Jesteri;/ $ZO~I(~ 5810 CUTVe tnrou~n 2 C~:i~:^31 F:~ ,:;~v
;:.. - ~ ~~ o~ ~~3° 48' 43" an arc distance of 32 •37 feet to ~:~e 'ce~:.~;r~ir,~; o: a
~ reverse c~ar~..: concave Soutnerly hav~n~ a radius of ~:~;.00 ica~;
, ~ tnence 4leste-rly along said curve throu~h a cent-ral ai;~le o: 02° ~i,j ~
~' i ~! 50" an arc distance of 48.17 feet- to a point in tne Sou;:neriy ',~:,c
oi the Oran~{e County Flood Control CY:annel, 65.00 feet ~•~idc; ~~~.u
I I. \
• ~, (con~inued) i ,
;, , . ~c; . ;
. ~ .
C ; f ~ , , •i ~ .;
' ' ; i: t....~.~~.j.~~ . G?_( jr-~~ :,
`. ~ I t' ' ,.,~, .
j . ~~~
''~ •~hFd~ AMlRIC4N LAND TI*1 ~•` rr,~pT10N ~ CYIIFORNIA LANO TR{.H ABBOCIATION
I ('
`'~
~ .
'i.~:•:::~ •
J0.11~ Cv:~~~ ~1 ~O~.~ii: l:l a1 CUfVC ~77 '~c1.:La :i0u~~lGT'1f l~.i~i' Cv~iCBVC
1~0'l~Gl7cu~~;'liv havin~ 3 lAC1:i.U;; Oi )Z~j.~~ iC(9~~ a ra6i~~ 1`rc
_. i
~` i:i;'_'JL;~;l1 5~11C3 OOi17~ OC32S $OU~l1 1}~°.7~~ ~~~~ Lo2u~J ~(~CtlCi; ~
~Ol ~; ~asterly alon~ uc1~.C~ CU2'VC i:ril GU(~[l a eentral cltl~ii; Gi 1~°
r- 7l` ~(" an arc distance of 100.9u teet to thz be;;innin~ o~'a
i~; ! ~ ~ reverse ct;rve in said Sou~nerl~ line, concave SouL-heas;;erl
~ f13V:1:1;_, S i 301U5 Oi ~4 ~~ , 7~ i@t ~~ thence Alortheas ~erly 31G:7[~',Y
~, I,,,~. saio curve tnrou~h a cen ~ral an~le of 38° Ul' 2i" ar, arc
_ G:iSi.c1:1CC Oi 313.~j0 feet ~O ~,~@ ~'rC.'SG 1.11'1C Oi S~ld r,u5i, one-hu~i
OI' ~ne GSS~ O~'1@-Y131i Oi NorL'nv~esti O,U3i ~el'; ~her,ce $OU~f1 ~° ~6~
' 40" nas~ 337•O1 fee~ to tne point of be~innin~. '
~.~',1' ~ The record title to said land is vesLed as folloi•~s:
. 4 - _....__,~-,~..,~ ~ - .~~ ~<~<,,...~..a..,..,.<_.. .
._: :~:._-,-~, ._ . .. .
~ "'"-,,,~- _.. ~ . - .s.~, -
~
~ ~r
~ •
NOW, 'I'HE3tE~'OR1E, DE 1T R ,1LVED that th~ An~lm City Pl~onia{ ~aeiesion daes y~reby r~commend
to the Citr Couacil of ik~ Citq sf qa~heIm th~t srbj~ct P~titioR Eoc R~duaf6e~ b~pProv~d ~~d, by io doin~,
tk~~t TiW li-Zonin~ of the Ai~F-Nm l~aicip~l Cai~ b~ ~mend~d to ~:cl~de !lu ~-ove ~eacriMd p~operty from the
R-A, Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said described property into the R-2, Mul'tiole Famil~
Residential, Zone, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary pre-
requisite to the oroposed use of subject property in order to preserve the saf ety.and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land
32 feet in width from the centerline of the street, along Burton Street, for street wider.ina
purposes. ~
2. That the owner of subject property shall caed to the City of Anaheim a cul-de-sac with
a minimum radius of 40 feet for the extension and terminus of Blossom Lane.
3. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the
City of Rnaheim along Burton Street and Blossom Lane, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks,
street grading and oaving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as
required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file
in the office of thE City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the
City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City tc guarantee the installation of said en9ineering
requirements.
4. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.OU
per front foot along Burton Street and Blossom Lane, for street lighting purposes.
5. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per
front foot along Burton Street and Bio~om Lare, for tree planting purposes.
6. That the owner of subjECt property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00
per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes,said amount to be paid at the
time the Building Permit is issued.
~. That Condition Idos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be cornplied ~vith within a
period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOtf is signed end approved by me thi: 3Jst day of tviay, 1968.
, ~~ ~
~CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
L~~C%N~ / .1'z?-~J~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed end wdopted at e meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim,
held on ~+~ay 20, 1968, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Rowland.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 31st day of May, 1968.
~~;: } ~
~I
<<: . ~ _
:;;:
,i~;._,, w .i
r*{' ~ ,~ `~'~
~=, ~
~~~ . ,
s~'~'] '~:;
w~;`; ' i
~
~'. :'
:d~
RESOLUTION N0. 139
R2-A
~%~~~1'~~
SECRETARY AHAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_2.
~
.~ ~
r. ~ - A
_. \