PC 68-144./, "
RESOLUTION N0. P~bg"'~44
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
~ETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0.67~68 •$~ BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclassifica-
tionfrom ERICH AND ALMA WINGER, 161 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Space 66, Placentia, California
92670, Owners; FREDRICKS DEVFI..OPM,EI~~' CpRPORATION, 524 West Commornxealth Avenue, Fullerton,
~alifornia 92632, Aoent of certair real prope:ty situated ir ~he City of Anaheirn, ~oonty or
Orange, State of California, described as the West half of the Southwest quarter of ~he South-
west quarter of Section 7, iowr.ship 4 South, Ranye 10 West, San Bernardino Bzse and Meridian.
FXCEPTING all that portion lying within the exterior boundaries of the £ast
. Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of said Section 7, ALSO EXCEPTIIvGOTHERkFRON that
portion lying North of the following described line: Commen:;ing at the Northwest corner of
the Souih half of the Southwest quarter of said Section ?, thence South 0~13'45" East 564.33
feet to the true poir,t of beginning; ther.ce North 88~57 17" East. ALSO FXC£PTING THER~FROM
the South 190.00 feet thereof.
~
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on
h1ay 20, 196R~ at 2:00 o'clock p.i~, notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as required by
law and in accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence
for end against seid proposed reclassification end to investigete and make findings and recomm endations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself and in its behalf, ar.d
after due consideration of ali evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and detecmine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the above described property from the R- p., Agricultural,
Zone to the R-3, Multiple Famiiy Residential, Zone.
2. That G eneral Plan Amendment :~!o. 99 was considereo in conjunct:on with sub;ect
reclassification.
3. That the pcoposed reclassificetion of subject property is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and pro-
per developrr.~ent of the community.
4. Thet the proposed teclessificetion of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their permitted
uses locally esteblished in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally esteb-
lished throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of suhject property requires the dedication and
imorovement of abutting streets in accordance u~~ith the Circulation Element of the General
Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the intensifi-
cation ~f land use.
1
, ' ~
~,
, '~ "'r`~
y ~
,I ~ R-A -1-
~
~.i :1
~
h
\
t;r:;..
bi;
`i
~
u
};
-~
: ~ ~ 's
~ ~~ "~
i
; '~
~ , :~
~ NOW, '('gEREFORE, 8E IT ' 10LVED th~t the Aa~heim City Pl~nnin~ ~immisaion does hereby recommend
to the City Council ot the City of ,.n~heim th~t subject Petition fot R~cl~eei:raation be approved and, by so doing,
that Title 1&Zonin` of the MeheIm MunIclael Code be ~mended to exalude the ~bove deacribed property from the
R-A. Aqricultural, Zone and to incorporate sa~a ~escribed ornperty irto th~ R-3, Muitir>~e Family
Residential, Zom~, upon the foiio.vir,g co~di~:~ns which are hereby four,d to be a neces~ary pre-
requisite to the oroposed use of subject property in order to preserve the sa: ety ard generai
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land
53 feet in width, from the centerline of the street, along il,agnolia 5treet, for street widening
purposes.
2. That street improvement plans shal~ br prepared and all engineering requirements of the
~ity of Anaheim along Magnolia Street, such as curbs and gutters, sideuvaii<s, street grading
and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurter.art work shali be completed as required by
the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on fiie in the office
of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an amount and form satiisfactory to the City of Anaheim
shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation o` said engireerinq re?uirements.
3. That the owners of subject prooerty shall pay to tt~e City of Anah~im the sun~ o` $2.00
per front f'oot along A4agnolia 5treet, for streat iighting purposes.
4. That the owners of subject proper[y shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per
front foot along Magnolia Street, fo~ tree planting purposes.
5. That tne owners of~ subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheirr, the sum of $25.00
per dtivellinc, unit, to be used for par4 and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the
time the Building Permit is issued.
6o That Condition ^)os. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied r.~ith within a
period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 3 st day of tatay, I95R,
-<<J ~ G.
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAN G COMMISSION
ATTES'I':
L = ~~~ / 7a~Zr~Lt~/
SECRETARY ANA}IEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I. Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Com~ission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was pessed and edopted at e meeting oE the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on ~~~ay 20, i968, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Alired, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: t~one.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 31st day of May, 1968.
RESOLUTION N0. 144
R2-A
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-z-
~.
~
A