PC 68-165~~U,j,~ ~ PC68-165
A R=30[,U770M OR THE ClTY PLAIfN~1l3 00~1~9~ OF THL CITY OF' AIQApIlr
R~CO~IEt(D@(G TO THt Ct['Y CO(p~CII, pR 'M~ qTy OR ANAMdIi 771AT
PCflT10N ROR RLCLAlSIF1CAT10N NO. E~'68'95 sE DISAPPROVED
s.c:r a
.i`~, i ~
• ~
i
:' I
~
I
~.:.
•f~
~I
``~
N'H~ftEAS, ti-~ Clty Plamla6 Commisaion oE tho City of Mayei~ ~fd initiate a verified Petition for
. reclassificatidn on certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, described as Lot Nos. 55 ',;hru 65 of Tract No. 1781
Prooertv owners ~
Amelia McIntyre
1602 S. Brookhurst St.
Anaheim, Calif.,92804
Louis Falkowitz
1606 S. Brookhurst St.
Anaheim, Calif. 92804
Arthur Carl.Conger
1616 S. Brookhurst St.
Anaheim, Calif. 92804
Dorothy Porter
1620 S. 9rookhurst St.
Anaheim, Calif. 92804
Keith Dobbs
1644 S. Brookhu.st St.
Anaheim, Calif. 92804
Glen Miller
1632 S. Brookhurst St.
Anaheim, Calif. 92804
P~ill~am McCord
1640 S. Brookhurst St.
Anaheim, Calif. 92804
t ~d
i
i
~
~
~a~
-7~;
I ;
~ `;
I~
I ~~~
i:
' I
. jl., j:
p:'
~
-
,
,
*;,
i ;:
~ ~
i, ~ ;
i~
i;
wF1EREAS, tM City Piannins Co~slo~io~ did bold ~ pa`llc As~rf~~ ot ~ye ~jh, f~l la t~ Ciry o[ Ana6ei~
~ June 3, 1968 « 7:30o'elodc P.M. sotiw of stl~ prbtlc ~ei~~ 6a~,iv b~ i~ly ~iwa ~s rp~~ y~,
l~w Md ia ~ccoe~nc~ with tM pwvi~iou ot tb~ Mab~ie ~e_Mpd Cud~. ~tK l~,n, to 6ear ~d ca~eider
~vih~c.~t ta ~~d~st said ptooo~ed rxlamaificmtioa qd W lawstlpt~ +rd ~ie tdwtla~a ~ad neoAro~od~tioas
in co~edon twet~it~; ~sd
N'HEltEAS, ~dd Caomis~loo, ~Et~r dw u~paction, larestiptioa, ~ed ateiy aai~ by ihd( ~ ia its S»-
h~lt, and ~fter drt conaiderstiaa of dl svid~ace a~d ropoet~ oft~ ~t sai! YNtina, ioM fiar ~ad d~tar~lee the
foUowia` fact~:
1. Th~t tbc Planning Commission proposes a reclassification of the above described
property from the R-1, One Family Residential, Zone to the C-0, Commercial Office, Zone.
2. That subject reclassification was cortsidered in conjunction with General Plan
Amendment No. 102,
3. That the proposed reciassification is premature for consideration of a more intense
land use at this time, and should be reconsidered on an area basis upon request by the
property owners in the area.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is not necessary and/or
desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not prooerly relate
to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject
property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the
community.
6. That 7 persons appeared representing 30 persons present in the Council Chamber
in opposition, and that 2 persons appeared in favor of subject petition.
RD .1_
~
`
~
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassification be denied on the basis of the
aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOA' is signed and approved by me this 13th day of June~ 1968.
C i" G~ ~-r. y
~HAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
" ( -/`~~ Z'7( ' ~~2.C C>-,~i"
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
June 3~ 1968~ at7:30o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
I!
I! AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Herbst, Mungall, Rowland, Camo.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
• ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~auer.
1i
IN WITNESS WIiEREOF, i have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of Jun e~ 1968.
I~
~~~ /
i ^
I ;
" w RESOLUTION N0. 165
R2-D
.
~
~ '
I;
~ j''
~
1'
~
~ . ' ,.
_ C'~% z--~ L-' ~2 c C~;,~ ~;
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-
~
T