PC 68-172}
PC68-172
RtlO[.U7'iDli M0.
~ RR~OI.U?IQI 01- TNt ClTY PLAlOIDIG ~ OR 'fNt CPfY O! AlIAIlTaI
Rsoo~nt~oora ro TMi cmr caMC~c., or ~s cm os ~~ rw-r
~T~t'~N R'~R RtCLA3wl1CA71p01 pp. 67`68-94 ~ ~~
'~ ~I.
:;s~(>::: '~ ~
i;~~l.'-'~ f
"„ I
l
i
`' ,I
. \'I
11'HERL'AS, tbe Ctty Pl~eni~~ Co~~Nl~e o( t6e Gh, ~t p~m6ef~ ild initiate a verified Petition for
reclassification on certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County o: Orange,
State of California, described as Lot Nos. 268 thru 273 of Tract No. 2299
Propertv Owners
Frank Passarella
2161 W, Broadway
Anaheim, Calif. 92804
Rex L. Loop
2165 W, Broadway
Anaheim, Calif. 92804
Gail Baalke
2109 W. Eroadway
Anaheim, Califo 92804
David Michener
2175 W. Broadway
Anaheim, Calif. 92804
Timothy Daly
2433 W. Lincoln
Anaheim, Calif. 92801
Rose Daly
2183 W. Broadway
Anaheim, Calif. 92804
; ~d
~'FILREAi, tM City Pf~af~ Codiwio~ W b1! ~ Pn-Uc ~rio~ ~t tM CltrFWl i~ tl~t Cfty ot Asah~ia
on June 3, 1968, ~t7: 30 e'dod~ P.r. eotiw o( ~dd soYic M~rla~ bwis~ M~e~ ~If ~irw u
law sa~ ia ~ecoeA~rct with tlK proviola~s ol tM M~ ~'~ ~
ev;e.ec. t« ..~ ~+~r•t C~., a.pcw ti.n, eo l.ar a.e con.,a.r
~Most sdd propo~~d r~cirytic~tlo~ ~nd to iewstfprt~ odake (1sHop w/e~~sad~tioo~
in conn~etloa tber~+ft4; ~ed
^FIEttLAS, ~dd Codis~be, attu dw iup~.Klo~, lnw~tlptim, ~sd eC~ t~ ~r IWit ~ad ie its ba
Maif, a~d ~ItK dw eo~~ldmtlaa of ~11 wiM~ce rd repoets ofi~ at uf~ Yo~e1a{, /o~s 8N rd Mt~is~ tb0
kllowle~ f~cts:
1. 'I'hatthe Planning Commission p~oooses a reclassification of the above described
property from the R-1, One Family Residential, Zone to the C-0, Commmercial Ofiice, Zone.
2. That the scope of the proposed reclassification, if approved, does not warrant
an amendment to the General Plan at the present time, however, its relationship to the
General Plan symbol will be considered at the next annual review.
3. That the oroposed reclassification of subjec~ p:op?rty is not necessary andjor
desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
4. That the Commission finds that after considerable testimony and discussion,
together with a field inspection of the property, that the size and shape of the lots,
even after ultimate dedication, mar:es them suitable for residential retention~
5. That the proposed reclassification could have a deleterious affec,t on the
adjoining properties to the north and east, which are primarily developed with sing!e
fami)y homes.
6. That two persons appeared recresenting 30 persons present in the Council Cfiamber
and that a petition was received signed by 50 persons all in opposition to subject petition.
-1-
• --...~.:~. .~;:~
~ ,
r
~i
~_~,~~'I...~
34{~:,.:;;._~ ~
>'~~° :-t
a~; ,~ ,.
.~
~
,
r
fi, .
~~
i
4
s.
i
~
*~.'~
,~
,~
,s
J
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahei:n City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassification be denied on the basis of the
aforementioned findings.
! THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and a roved b me this
PP Y 13th day of June, 196$.
/
~ Ge~L~ ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COM ISSION
ATTEST:
i
_ ~
C~ "~- YZ tZ~ `~ ~, j
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
' I~ Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
~ June 3~ 1968, at7:30o'cldlk P.ht., by the following vote of the members thereof:
I
~1 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Herbst, Mungall, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
; ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ~auer.
I
~-,< IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of Juney 1968.
I~
I
~ ~; : ~ , ., '`7}2~ /~-,~ ~
n
SECRETARY ANAHGIh1 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
rx
RESOLUTION N0. 172
R2-D
-2-
~~
.~~,
~
~
r