PC 68-176~~.~
?r.
:r~,;,
;.'-.
`j:
i
~
~
.
-- sc
}
:;
RESOLUTION N0.
PC68-176
A I2ESULUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMI111SS10N OF THE CITY OF ANA1iEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE C1TY COUNCIL OF TIiE CITY OF ANAHEIII THA'f
PETITION FOR RF.CLASSIF'ICATION N0. 67-68-98 gE DISAPPI2()VLD
WNEREAS, tlie City Planning Commission of the C{ty of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Re-
classificatlon from JENPlIE L. DINKLER, 8262 Rio Vista, Anaheim, California °2806, Owner; HAROLD L,
RAAB, 14482 Beach Boulevard, Suite I, Westminster, California 92683, Agent of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full
; and
WHGREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in thc Cily of Anaheim
on June 17, 1968 at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by
1aw end in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim dlunicipnl Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate end make findings ond recommendations
in connection therewith; and
IVHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, inveatigation, end study made by itselE and in its be-
helf, and a(ter due consideratiun of all evidence and reports o(fered at said hearing, does [ind and determine the
following facts:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the ebove described property trom the R-A, Agricultural,
Zone to the R-2-5000, One Family, Zone to subdivide subject property into 116 lots.
2. That General Plan Amendment No. 97 was considered pr2viously in conjunction with
Reclassification No. 67-68-64 on the proFerty immediately to the south of subject parcel
with the Planning Commissi.on recommending to the City Council that Exhibit "D" of said
General Plan Amendment be approved vohich would change the symbology of the Plan to indicate
a medium density residential area around the commercial shopping center at Rio Vista Street
and Lincoln Avenue.
3. That Reclassification No. 57-68-64 was approved, in part, by the Planning Commissioi
and subsequently denied by the City Council with the General Plan Amendment being continued
to June 30, 1968, for additional study.
4. That the R-2-5000 Zona was designed to provide an alternate method of developing
property at a lesser density than zoned or found to be suitable for low-medium or medium-
density development on the General Plan, and was not intended to replace the existing R-1,
7200 One Family Residential, Zone.
5. That land to the east and north have been developed for R-1, 7200 square foot lots,
and subject property has no physical site problems that should warrant consideration of a
density greater than depicte;i on the General Plan.
6. That the*e have been no land use changes to warrant consideration of an increase
in density for the area easterly of Rio Vista Street.
7. That two persons appeared representing 14 persons present in the Council Chamber
all in opposition to subject petiticn.
*
~
'
' RD
-1-
~ ~
~
t , . .
r
i
~ .
~
~--
~! '~ • . ~ • ~ .~ ,~ „ ~. ~~ , . -- -- _
:r:; ~ ~ . .. ~,-. ~ , ~
*~ ~ ~S ~ .. . . ,~~~~ ~i ~ \ . ,
. ~
• ~ Yy~~
;~ ~ ~ ' . ~* r
i - ~_~ ' ~.,i~ ~`.~\~ !
i ; ' _,. • .: ~, _ -= ~ ~ ~ i
~ '~,.~ ~ `
,~ Firsl fl inerican Tille I~sura~~ce ~~ Trus~ Co~,rp,~i:~~ '=J
~ I ' 421 NORTM MAIN STREE7 • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA • Sa7.G092 • r~ ~
(:' c
I + '
~~ '
.:. ~ ,~ • ' • `.,7 `JJ ' I
. , ~ ~ ~
' . 1':c NAVE F:i\D AND DO HCREaY !
~ ~~ ~. ~,r Pf.OVL• Ti•!C FOLLOWIIvG~ a ~
aY ~~ i
~ ~~' , ~
~ . ~
~
~ ;
Your Vo, i
I Our Ordcr No. OR 875723-CR '
I
i
~,~, ~ 7he (oilowing is a report of ihe tille to the land described in your application for a Policy of TiNe Insur,,nce and is made I
without liabili~y and without obligation to issue such policy. In addition lo any exceptions show~ herein, and not cleared, ~
;;.' ''' the polity, if iswed, will contain condi~ions and slipulalions end elso exceptio~s from its coverage as may be embodied ~
~; I b y thc parti c ~l a r f o r m o f p o l i c y i s s u e d. • ~
.. I Dated as of A~ril 26, 1968 et 7:30 a.m. I
i j,~, . ~ ~ I
~N~ `
:~ ~ ~ . . I
TITIE OFFICEN ~ ,
~ Willinm H. Bruns, ~ ~' ~ ~~ l~ ~
'~ VE57EE: ,~~IE L. DINKLER, 8 widoW. • t
~ :; ` ~ ~ . ,
t ~ i~. ~'" ~'"~T'~o~J ~ i,
I , DESCRI - ._,;,,,_„_„ • ;
~ , ~ - '
~~' All that certain land situated in the State of Californie, County of Orange, !
City of Anaheim, described as folloWS: ~~
~; ihe South 5 acres of the SouthWest +'I
quarter of the Northwest quarter !,
;.: ~ -;~. an d t n e N o r t n h a l f o f t h e Nor t h ha l f of the North half of the Northwest ~~
~ ~:: o f t h e S o u t h w es t q u ar t er o f Section q u a r t e r i
~` ~' Rancno Son Juan Ca,jon de Santa Ana, as s'nownhon a maptrecorcled in book 51~ the - i~
i~ .1~age 10 of Miscellaneoue Maps, recorda of Ora~lge County, California. I
~ _ - ~I
~ -~ '.
F - ;~ ~ ~ ~n-~nre~_~~~ ?
~
'±~V ~r, ~iiJ4l\ 1~ l~j V ~1 ~
y -.,
`; %~li bI1:IN ce~ w~.in lnnd situated in thc State of Colifornia, Cowil,y o~ Orat~ge, ~
City o: ~1n2hcim, dcscribed a~ followc:
; :` ~ ' I
"' ` 1 ic Soi;i:h h~.tlf of ;;hc ~iorth hllf of thc Nori;h h:i1f of i:hc hori:l~we~t
i:-' , _
;~,~ I * qucu•;,cr of tlic Saui:ii~rc~t quartcr und thc Yori:l~ half. of thc Sou~th hulf o; thc f
~~ `~ idorth h21: oi' thc Northwcot qunr;.cr of thc Southweat quartcr of Scctlon 7, {
~: ~, ~.
~~'-~ "~ ; iuM:~~i;ip ~+ Soutil, Rn~~~c 9 Wcat, in ti~a Aw~cho Sun J~vsn Cn,jon dc Snni;u Aru~, i
_ ,; as shorn on a r,~.p rccorded in book 51, pat{e 10 of Miacellaneoua N~.pa, ~
:~~:! j records of Orange County, California. f
; ! . ~
'~ i ~' ~- ' ~rx~-x~~~*~r i
_<`. - ~ • i
1 ' ..;...~.q. _-. :. f ~ -"_ __ ~ .
.,.. ,...~~ ,.....~
.~.~..
`~ ' '" ,. - +~,:,,~ ~~,+~p~::
-;?~ ~ ,
-,-`ii ; - ~
.`
~ ~
T
1.
•t• r
~= A
~`
~;
f
~
~
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassification be denied on the basis of the
aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 27th day of June, 1968.
_/' ~ _
---- ~ .uui~ 1 ~/ .O,P a
~CH~AIRMA ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
PRO TEM
ATTEST:
/ ~' /1~1~2 / / C fi~/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF C?,LIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAFIEIM )
I~ Ann Kr ebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held c
June 17, 1968~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Rowland, Allred.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~1one.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Camp.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of June, 1968,
~ 2~2.. ~ %/JGC ~~ %
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~
~ a
RESOLUTION N0. 176
R2-D _2_
~
_~