PC 68-185~,
RESOLUTION N0. PC68-185
~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RHOJMMENDING
I'0 THE CITY ~UNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN
N0. 95 BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, as a result of the City Council's adoption of "A Study of the Problem of
Residential Homes Fronting on Arterial Streets", the Flanning Commission initiated General
Plan Amendments, Reclassification petitions, and Area Development Plans to implement con-
version of the 17 areas designated in the front-on study from residential to office and
professional or general commercial uses; and
i WHEREAS, Area Development Plans are designed to assist in providing secondary or
additional circulation to those properties fronting on arterial streets which have been
considered appropriate for conversion to commercial uses; and
I ~`.
;
!
'" WHEREAS, the City
the City of Anaheim on Planning Commission did hold a public hearing in the City Hall in
J
17
'
having been duly given une
, 1968, at 2:00
as required by law and 0
clock P.M., notice of said public hearing
in accordance
ith th
~
Anaheim Municipal Code,
Development Plan
a
d t
to hear and consider
i w
e provisions of the
evidence for and against said proposed Area
~~~ ,
n
therewith; and o
nvestigate znd ma}:e findings and recommendations in connection
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself
and in its behalf and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said
hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That subject property is comprised of seven parcels, the northerly five parcels
are presantly developed with low-density single-family homes; the sixth parcel
is z large R-A parcel with two sinqle-family residential homes; and that thF~
southernmost parcel, zoned R-A has a single-family home and a parking lot used
by an adjacent commercial use.
,
'''
; i
I ~~ 2• That adjoining land uses include low-density single-family residential homesites
to the west; retail commercial to the north; retail commercial, commercial-
professional, and a low-density single-family residential homesite on land
''~ ~anned fo: corr~n '
P- crcia~ uses, to the east; and commercial-professional and
" retail
i
l
'~
- commerc
a
to the south.
>;,:',.. I - 3. That the Traffic Engineer has indicated that the present daily vehicular
, traffic cour,t on ~uclid Street is 32,000 automobiles, and is projected to
., I carry 40,600 vehicles per day in ten years.
~ 4. That all properties have curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, and a half-width
j street dedication of 50 f eet on Euclid Street, however 53 f eet is required
;
` I for a primary street.
`~ 5. That the minimum depth of any of the lots would be 97 feet after ultimat e
dedication on Euclid Street; anu that the maximum front yard depth on any
i of the lots wnuld be approximately 17 iaet after ultimate dedication.
I
6. That rear
parking and/or secondary access (alley) could not be develooed on
the northerly five parcels without removing the existing structures, since
, rear yard depths average only 20 feet; however the three structures on the
• two southernmost parcels could be retained for office or professional use con-
- ~ version, since lot areas are large enough to accommodate parking towards
; ~ the rear of the lots and at the side of the structures. Futhermore all
existing structures would have to conform to all the pertinent building
'
and zoning provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
I
~
- ~
i 7. That retail and service commercial uses are probably preferable in this
_ area, since similar uses are developed to the north and south
and the C-1
. ,
Zone permits commercial-professionai use if subject properties do not lend
~>' themselves to full commercial development.
`z'
;;' 8. That three persons appeared representing 12 persons present in the Council
Ch
b
i
;`
:,
~ am
er
n opposition, and that one person appeared presenting a petition
signed b
12
ersons
ll i
f
i+
. y
p
a
n
avor, of subject area development plan.
~
~
~
~~
~
`~~;~;~ NOW, THEREFURE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Pianning Commission does hereby recommend
`r~ to tha City Council of the City of Anaheim that Area Development Plan No. 95 be approved as
~~'~`' a method of providing secondary circulation for those lots fronting on the west side of
F::;:
r~'"` Euclid Street southerly of Broadway, subject to the following conditions.
t~: ,
~;;,,t ,
,.:.
~'"' 1. That a standard, 20-foot alley be provided and dedicated to the City, to the
~~`'~ rear of all subject properties as they develop for commercial or commercial-
~i:t
~.:; professional uses (since a 2s1 structurai setbac~ adjacent to the single-
",~~:~' family, residential homesites to the west would be required).
~~;.
b}:•:
~~r 2. That only three (3) vehicular accessways be permitted to Euclid Street, to
~ lessen vehicular movement on this strect. The locations shown on Exhibit "A"
are only suggestions. Final vehicular accessway locations would require the
~ approval of the Development Services Department and the Traffic Engineer, when
the properties are initially developed for commercial or commercial-professional
! uses. If the vehi~cular accessways are mutually developed and the properties
adjoining said accessways are developed singly or jointly~ it will be r,acessary
. that a mutual agreement be recorded, by property owners involved upon initial
zoning action, to guarantee final joint vehicular access (10 feet on each
P~P~'tY~ •
THE FORE~OING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 27th day of June, 1968.
,~ , ' ; j /~ /~~zrr.~, .
CHA3RHIA ANAHEIM CITY PLAiJNING O~MMISSION
PRO TF1v1
ATTEST:
~z2-~L~ ~,~.~.~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMNISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on June 1~, 1968, at 2s00 0'c1ocE~ P.M.~
by the following vote of the members thereof: ~
AYES: COMMISSIONFRS: Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Allred.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: OJMMISSIONERS: Farano, Camp.
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERSs Rowland.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of June, 1968.
r ~ ? ?/s'~-~~ / /) t~-v ~ /
. SECRETARY ANAHEIM~CITY ?LANNING COMh1ISSI0N
- II`I~ Res. No. 185
-
~
~
~
- , '~rv:.a -.-•-- ~:~.:,..~ .r ~.:.F~r......... .~. _ ,. ~
~ , _. ,.
~ .. rt,...._... .~ • .. ^ ,. ~
~ ,. . • ,
_ _ ~,