PC 68-306~~;:
~
.~
_- ;r ~ PC68-306
' RESOLUTION ~> __ ~
A RESOLUT[ON OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF i'HE CITY ~F ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1050 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Con-
ditionel Use Permit from FRANK HORNY, 353 South La Brea Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90036,
Owner; HAP,RY KNISELY, Suite B, 1741 South Euclid Avenue, Anaheim, California 92802, Agent
of certain real property situated in the City of Maheim, County of Orange, State o£
California, describetl in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and ref erred to herein as though set
forth in full
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on ~Ctober 7, 1968, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given
as required by law and in accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal code, Chapter 18.64, to hear
and consider evidence for end against said proposed conditional use and to investigate and meke findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its be-
half, and after due consider~Yion of nll evidence and reports offered at seid heering, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which e Conditional Use Permit is authocized b~~ Code:
Section 18,64.020(1-e) to wit: establish a 315-unit planned residential development
with waivers of the following:
S~CTION 18.28.050(5-a) - Maximum buildina heiQht. (Two-storv permitted;
three-storv (37 feet high) proposed)e
SECTION 18.28.050(5-b) - Maximum buildinq heiaht. (One-storv within 150
f eet of a singie-family residential zone permitted;
three-story within 94 feet of single-family zone
proposed .
SECTION 18.28.050(3~,
SECTION 18.28.050~2)
SECTION 18.28.050(6-b-2
SECTION 18.28.050~10)
SECTION 18.28.C150(11)
CI-D
- Minimilm rloor area oer dwellinct unit. (700 s uare
f eet requixed; 475 spuare feet (45 single units
proposed)o
- Minimum buildinct site area oer dwellina unito
(1200 spuare feet per dwelling unit required;
800 square f eet per dwelling unit proposed).
- Minimum buildinca setbacks (from west property line).
( 7-f • required; 15-f eet proposed).
- Off-street ~arkina. (406 cove_red parking spaces re-
quireed; 304 cov~red parking spaces and 102 un-
ov parking spaces proposed)._
- 6-foot masonrv wall~ (6-foot masonry wall required ~
adjacent to R-A Zoned property required; none proposed)
_1_ i
s
f
`_
~
I
I
I
i
~
i
,~-.
,~ i -~
J ~
•~' 1 . . ' I ~ .
~ 1 I
' I
i
1 ~".) ~ ~ .. ~ . .
i
.~ '
T~ . „"..J ~ ...
~' .~' i .
:~. , I
~
.,
1 t:.
•,
, .
~ .".,v'S '7P!'IT~~~.~«---..-....:.-- -- - ~
~ ~ ' _ ~/ ~~ y .` i\ \~ ~. /~ ~ . y~ ~ ,
~ ~t? ..^7~~ ~~r,..~~. `'_ / ~~ .
? •, .. .. •y ~ ~~ ~ .
p1~ ~
~ ,,.~ ''~." ' ` '` % ~~~,,. ~ ,~ ~
r /~ ~1 ~*:~ ~
.w;~
\~\~:1~ 1 .iY~ ~/~~ rt ~ ~.
- :; . ~',,; <_ ; r~ ~
.~ ~ ~
First American Tille lasurance & Trust Company
~ 421 NORTH MAIN STREET • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA • 547-6892 ~
~
. ~
i
i 'i
`t FRANK HORNY AND ASSOCIATES .
^' ~ C~0 MC DANIEL ASSOCIATF~S ;
, ' ~ 500 NaRTFi ANAHEIM BLYD. ~'
ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA
A'I'i'N: MR. BILL ARMEP S
; ~
i ;, - Your No. ti
, ~., Our Order No. OR-1o61491 ; i
The following is a report of the fitle fo the land described in your applicafion for a Policy of Tifle Insurance and is made
~ `, ' ~
- without liability and without obligation fo issue s~ch policy. In addilion to any excepfions shown herein, and not cleared, `
the policy, if issued, will contain conditions and stipulations and also exceptions from its toverage as may be embodied ,~
^ by fhe parficular form of policy issued. ;
j ~
;{ D d as of JU]y ~ at 7:30 a.m, ; ~
` ~ '~ s~ ~ ~
` nr~e o - / D a
Bernerd F. Selz ~ ~~ ~
i
~:~;- VE57EE: FRANK HORNYD a merried man~ ae hia separate property en undiyided. one- ~
"•~ helf interest; PAUL AhffR, a m~rried man, ae hie separate ~•ro5~:~t;~, an undivided ~ ,
one-qvarter intereet; end WILISAM WEISII.~ a married man~ as nis ~eparate property~ ?
i an und3vided one-qusrter intereet. S
_......~r: .:............._---.._..__ )
_ I --------- _
' J ~--- -- 1'
..,
- r~~:
. ~ , "~'~-
.:.
.. , ~; -
~:?... ~r;., .
- .. . . : ' ~ . ~ ~ . 1T~. ~'y: .M... ,~,~ ...~yir
• . . . , . ... . ' ~ . .~ .
. . . ... . .. . . .~ , ~
. . . . ~ ~ . ~ `~. . . .
, ... , , . . .. ~. .. . .. . ~ . ' . . . ~ ~ ~b ~ . ~ . .
~~
~~
I
~' . . . •
~ ..
r ~~.
~:
:,~; ,.~~ ~ ~;
,
~~ ,
i ,
~
-: i
;`- ,
~
.~
~~' ~
i
j 1
~
~
I
i
~
~
~
-~
;
~
~.
;
.
I
.,~ ~
-,
~ ~i ~ i
, , ,
.
~ ~
. i -.--. _. _..._. . _ __ ~ . _ ._ .
' ~
;
_ . ~
a
;
~
~ ~----- ____- _-_ -- - . _
• ` . ~ , .._..__ ~
_ ~
.
o1t-1o61491
r DESCRIPTION
pu that certain land situated in the State of California~ County of Orangey
City of Anaheim, described aa foll~e:
•, Lot 3 8e shaNn on a Map thereof filed in Book 1~ Page 56 of Record of Surveya
in the QfYice of the Recorder of said County, ~ying Southerly of the Norther~y ;
386.05 ~eet of said Iat 3 and Southeaster~y of the Southeasterly line of the '
lerui deacribed in deed to the Orange County Flood Control Diatrict recorded ;
Sept~er 2, 1960 in Book 5401, Page 414 of Official Records.
r i
F~{CEP'P theref~an that portion thereof deecribed ae follare:
8egirusin6 at a point distant Westerly 315.00 feet e1ong the Southerly line of
~;~'_ -' said Norther]y 386.05 feet fran the Easterly line of seid Lot 3; thence Southerly
pare,llel with said Easter~y line 240.00 feet; thence South-vesterly 3~.30 feet
to a Point in the Wester],y line of said Lot 3 dietant Souther~}r thereon'~43.75
feet from the NortYn-eet corner thereoY; thence Northerly ~1cmg eaid Westerly
'*`~' line 357.70 feet to the Southerly line of eaid Northerly 386.05 feet; thence
.~x ~ Easter~lr along eaid Souther]y ].ine 362.00 feet to the point oP beginning.
( AISO E7CCCEPT therefr~ the Westerx}r 281.98 feet thereof.
' ~.
,
~ j
~ ~y,....... ___,_._..... __.
~ ;~-.-----.._.__._._ _ _.._...__. i
- ~Sui ~
n:-..
: `~=~~~ ,~ ~,~
.. ' . ~ ~ . . .... ~ ~ .~ . . .. . " ~ .. *:'~ y ._W
. . . . , . . ' r,` I ~, ~a. _.. . . . .
~ ~ . . . . . ,. .~ ~ .... . ~ . ~~ ' .
. , .~ ~ ~ . . ~ a ' ._e ~
~
,
5-:^':~~,~-:t;:>;~.,.~..4....-__ _ __._.,..~......_.--
~
r '`~ t,.)
2. That although the property is zoned for E-3, Multiple Family Residential,
land use, to permit development of the property at the density proposed wouid create
an undue hardship on public facilities and on Nortn Street which has not been designed
to handle the proposed increase in traffic.
3. That the proposed use will adversely affect the single family homes fronting
on North Street and the adjoining land uses and the growth and d evelopment of the area
in which it is proposed to be located.
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow
the full development of the property within the confines of the density requirements
and site development standards of the R-3 Zone, in a manner which would not be detrimental
to the particular'area nor to the peace, health, saf ety, and generai welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. I'hat the agent for the petitioner indicated that they would xedesignthe develop-
ment to comply with all R-3 Zone requirements EXCEPT the one-story height limitation
within 150 feet of R-1 or R-0 Zoned property, the two-story height limitation, and the
density; however, historically the City has not granted waiver of the one-story height
limitation based on the fact they were desirous of preserving the residential integrity
and the privacy of a low-density residential area, and if the density requirement were
changed, it would upset the balance between the public facilities and the people living
in this area.
6. That waiver of the one-story limitation ar;jacent to single family zoning would
set an undesirable precedent for the entire City, and the petition:er had not proven
that development of the property under the R-3 Code requiremants uvould create a hardship.
7. That the proposed increase in traffic volume would exceed the capacity of the
str eet by more than 20% and would create a hazard for the children attending the school
and youngsters utilizing the YMCA facilities presentiy under constructiono
8, That 7 p~sons appeared to represent 25 persons at the first hearing, 30 persons
at the second hearing, and 40 persons at the last hearing, all in opposition; and that
a petition signed by 15~ persons was received in opposition, as well as 10 persons
appeared in favor of subject petition.
IdOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby deny subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit on the basis of the aforementioned
findings:
THE ~REGOING RESOLUTION Zs signed and approved by me this 17th day of October,
1968.
ATTEST:
I ~'?ivl/C~ =~? w'~2/
SECR&TARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
CHA RMAN AHE M ITY PLANNING CAMMISSION
STATE OF CALIf~RNIA )
CAUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF pNAHEIM )
, I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the ~ity Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on October 7, 1968, at 2:00 0'
clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof!
AYES: ~MMISSIONfRS: Camp, Farano, Herbst, Rowland, Allr ed.
I..
NOES: COMMISSION£RS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONFAS: Gauer, Mungall.
IN WITNESS WHER~F, I have her.eunto set my hand this 17th day of October, 1968.
5~;
~ ,'~~• ~ _~~~ ~~ V G
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
i
,
i
i
~
~
-;~'' -~ S
,~w~ :.~, ~, : ,y,,, r ~
~ . x~.:
_~
I ~