PC 68-319i
~
~.. _
r,:...^.,~' ,
~.~'~.~ .~~~. r:~:Y!:"~v_.r~m-..~..-~.__...... ....._......~...~..w~.__...
. .... ._...
.._ ' L+ . . ..
l~
' ~'' r ~~
~+'j
` RESOLUTION N0. p~68-319
, 'l
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2020 gE APPROVED I N PART
._ .. . ... . .. ....__'_....- J
~
t
WHEREAS, the City Plenning CommIssion of the City o£ Anaheim did receive a verified Petition fot Verience ftom
WILLIAM AND NINA M. SIMMONS, % MIL~S AND ASSOCIATES, Box 2125, Anaheim, California, Owne~s; R~ D.
MILES, 800 South Brookhurst, Anaheim, California 92804, Agent of certain real property situated
in the ~ity of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Lot Nos. 5, 6 and the
north half of Lot No. 7 of tract No. 796 .
't ; and
' WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a publIc hearing et the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on ~
'~ ; November 4, 1968, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by ;
iF law end in acoordence with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for
and ageinst said proposed variance and to investigate end meke flnding's end recommendetions in connection therewith;
and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, invesGga4on, and atudy made by itself and in its behelf, ~~
~ and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at seid heoring, does find and determine the following ~
fects:
9
s 1. That the petitioner requests e veriance from the Aneheim Municipal Code as follows, to d evelop subj ect ~§
;~ property with a 60-unit apartment complex:
~ SECTION 18.28.050(9-b) - Maximum distance of livina units from a standard stree~. ~
I~
-1 (A maximum of 200 feet permitted; 257 feet proposed). '
I '• ;
'~~ SECTION 18.28.050 9-a - Ade u v . .
o a e ehicular access for Ci v servic v hic rP~~~~rA~t~ ;;
i~ ~nadeauate acc for fire equipment provided. ;j
-~Ia
- SECTION 18.28.050(6-b-2) - Min mum o en ar struc ur 1 setback. (22 and'16 f eet
_ required; 15 and 15 f eet proposed .
~
_ ,' 2. That waiver of adequate vehicular access for City service vehicles is hereby denied ~
!;a$ on the basis that adequate fire protection cannot be given to residents of the extreme westerly `
' units thereby being materially detrimental to the public welfare and injurious to the property
`:;I ~ or improvements in the general area surrounding subject property.
3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generaliy to the
property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone. I
I 4. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a ?
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone and denied
to the property in queation.
~
'`3 5. That the requested variance, as approved, will ~ot be materialiy detrimental to the '
public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which
• the property is located.
' 6. That one person appeared, representing six persons present in the Council Chamber, i
';,~ in opposition, and a petition was received signed by 30 single family homeowners also in
~' opposition to the density proposed which could affect the traffic flow and safety of children
living in th~s area.
11~
Vl' -1-
!
" ~
- w. .c7,x.7i~c.~tg r;; . ~~- ~ ~L:..4
> . ~. t ~; _ . .. , . . , . . ~
. 4, ~ ~ . ' . . ~
0 '~
_ I
~ ,
~ I
~..~
,..
~;~~._ .
;
_ _. _.._
I_
~~
. ~' ~_~
n part
IVOW, Tc1EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Varience, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and generai welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No.
63-64-62(6).
2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file
with the office of.the Director of Pul~iic Works.
3. That fire hydrants•shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by
the Chief of the Fire Department.
4. That a 6-foot masonry.wall shall be constructed along the west pzoperty line.
5. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded :`rom view,
and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes.
6. That Condition Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior
to final building and zoning inspections.
7. That subject property shall be developed substantially fn accordance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, Revision
No. 2; provided, however, that a two-lane 24-foot wide emergency drive for City service
vehicles and commercial vehicles is developed along the the north property line leading to
the proposed cul-de-sac, and that said emergency drive shall r~nain unblocked at all times.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 14th day of November, 1968.
ATTEST:
~~~ ~ ~~~~~.
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
(/'~? y~/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM~CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann ICTebs~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby cettify that the forr
going resolution wes passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on
November 4~ 1968~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the fotlowing vote of the members theteof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Gauer, Mungall, Rowland.
NOLS: COMMISSIONERS: None.
aBSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Farano, Herbst.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 14th day of November, 1968.
RESOLUTION NO. 319
V2-G
(/G~~/C~~~~ C~~~p 2_-.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
.2.
;~
r •~".,'~'~'~G~`.
, " a~"-
° , !~
. . .. _ ` ..~
~
~
~._.
•~ ~
~
1?~ ~
W:._.. ;~
I " ~~