PC 68-340i
! ? .------_...__ . _
,
~ ~
RESOLUTION NO
PC68~340
I~ .
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2029 gE APPROVED IN PART
WHEREA5 the City Plannin Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition ior Varience from
LLOYD J. TRAPf~, ET AL, 5219 ~hady Gien Lane, Anaheim, California 92806, Owner; JACK SPENC~ER DAVIS,~
6700 Stanton Avenue, Buena Park, California 90620, Ag ent of certain real property situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as That portion of the East
half of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of section 12, Township 4, South, Range 10
West, in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, as per map recorded in book 51 page 10 of
Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the county recorder of said county, lying northerly of the
north line of the land described in the deed to the State of California, recorded November 26,
1963 in book 6817 page 876 Official Records. EXCEPT that portion thereof described in the deed
to Humble Oil and Refining Company recorded January 28, 1964 in book 6899 page 798 of Official
Records. ALSO EXCEPT the East 30.00 f ee't of that portion thereof included within the s~utheast
quarter of said northeast quarter of the southeast quarter.
~ ; and
~' ,,~ WHER EAS the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
November 189 t968~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by
law and in eccordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for
and against said proposed variance and to investigate end make finding's and recommendations in connection therewith;
` end
~~
'i ~ \
,.~
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and efter due consideration of all evidence and repods offered at seid hearing, does find and determine the following
fects:
1. That the petitioner requests a varience from the Anaheim Municipal Code as followsY to develop
subject property with a 286-unit apartment complex:
S~ECTION 18 3.050 3 - Maximum lot coveraae. (55 permitted; 56•9~ proposed)o
SECTION_18,26.050(6-c) - Accessorv bL:l inos abuttinca a s~de Rro~ertv line,
(Accessory building abutting side property line within
rear ~ permitted; accessory buildings abutting side
property line within front 75 proposed)a
SECIION 18.28.050(7-a) - Minimum distance between buildinas. (Twelve separate
variances from this Code provision proposed).
SECTION 18e28.050(9-b) - Location of livina units from a standard street. (A
maximum of 200 feet permitted; 250 feet proposed)o
2. That because the property is adequate in size and no hardship had been proven,
waiver of the maximum lot coverage for the southerly portion is hereby denied.
3. That the requested variance, as approved, is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity
and zone, and denied to.the property in question.
4. That the requested variance, as approved will not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone
in which the property is located.
i ~
r~} ~
y
r ~ ~
~ i
r~ ~
"~,., *'AS `
.~~V _ _ .~ 3~~`~
. ..,. ,..~ ~ . ~ . :~
. - + .. . . .
. . . ~ i
~ . i . . .
~ .../ - . ~ . . . ~ . ^ .
. ' . .
,
. .... . ~ ~ i . ~_~.
, '+Ys~~+nn .__:..~. ~ - . _- __-
,..:._._...
~ .
~Y
• .. . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . .
_
-__... . . . . .:..-------'----._.... _ ..
~ ~'~
~
~ . . 1
`.. _./
in part
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grantlsubject
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfa~e of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification
No. 68-69-43.
2. That subject property shall be dev~loped substantially in accordance with plans
and specif ications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4,
provided that the plans for the southerly por•tion shall conform to the maximum lot coverage
provisions of the R-3, Zone.
THE FOI2EGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 27th day of November~ 1968.
~/~'~.~C-r~C~.~~,.-~~ ~i~/~ l,I.P~Cit ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~'~~`~~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby cedify that the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
November 18~ 1968~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rowland.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of November~ 1968.