PC 68-346:~y , -
~ _: :~ ~ r ~i~4~..,,, ~..._ ~
:. .., .. ... _. ....__..____._...__.. . .
:
T" ~ I~ j
C"
_ ~ RESOLUTION NO..
i I
~I
_--- ,1---_ . .. _ _ - --
PC68-346
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2033 BE APPROVED IN PART
~
~._.__._.._.._,..., ~
~
. {
i
i'
i
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive e verified Petition for Veriance from
ROBERT TUCKFA, 333 South Euclid Street, Anaheim, California 92802, Owner; AD ART, 14365 I'
Firestone, La Mirada, California 90638,~Agent of certain real property situated in the City of ~
Anaheim, Co~~nty of Orange, State of California, described as the Northerly 319a26 feet of the ~
Easterly 245.01 f eet of the S.E. ~ of the N.E. ~ of Section 17, Township 4, South range 10, West ~
SBBBM in Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana and the Rancho Los Coyotes, except therefrom the !
Northerly 45 feet in Broadway and Easterly 53 feet in Euclid, also except therefrom the Northerly :
155 feet of the Easterly 203 feet and the Northerly 195 f eet of the Easteriy 173 f eet under
lease to the Richf ield Oil Corporation.,
i
~
r
i
i
) 911C~ ~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commiasion did hold a public headng et the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on i
December 2~ 1968~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notIce of said public hearing havin been dul
law and In accordaece with the provisions oE the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and cons der evidence for ~
end against said proposed variance and to investigate and make finding's and recommendations in connection therewIth;
end ,
WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investlgetion, and study made by itself and in its behelf,
end efter due conaideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does ffnd and determine the following
facts:
V3- -1-
i ;
i
;
i
~
:i -:
~
et. ;
:ak.
;J~, .
?;„~~, ~
_ . ~ ~l.. , ' 3~."7~,`',~~, m~ -~.a , «~„a.:,. -^~..+'~!~'
l ::
. . .. . : . ~ ~..~_ . . . . ..
. ~ . . . ~ ~ ~ ~~ C - . ~
. ~ i
1. Thet the petitioeer requesta e veriance from the Anaheim Municipal Code as follows~ to permit the
replacing and enlarging of existing signs on subject propertys
SECTION t8_F~~ 090~b_2Z - M~~mum heiaht ~f a free stand~~~ (25 f
S'~"• eet permitted•
34~ proposed). '
F
( SECTION 78 6_o O~b-5) - L~c~~ion of a free-standina sian. (50 f eet from adjacent
property line required; 39 feet proposed).
SECTION 18.62 090(c) - Maximum area of a wall sian. (~ of the wall ar ea per-
4
; mitted; 32,4 of the wall area proposed).
2. That waiver of the maximum area of a wall sign Section 18.62.090(c) is hereby denied
on the basis that redesign of ttie proposed sign can be accomplished within the confines of the
Code, and approval would establish an undesirable precedent for similar requests for commercial
development throughout the city.
! 3. That granting of the waiver of maximum height of a free-standing sign and the
f location of a free-standing sign is made on the basis that the proposed free-standing sign will
eliminate existing projections on signs which are not an asset to the area, and said sign
structure was ~r ected at its present height and location prior to the adoption of the present
sign ordinance.
4. That the r equested variance, as approved, is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and
zone, and denied to the property in question.
5. That the requested variance, as approved, wiil not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which
the property is located.
6. That the lighted soffit proposed by the petitioner, after separation from the main
advertising sign, should not be considered part of the sign but part of the lighting of the
~area; however, no type of advertising copy should be pl.aced on the soffit such as letters or
"world" symbols as now indicated on the plans. The wall sign should then ~onform with the sign
ordinance requirements.
:
:.
~ .. .,...
,
.~.,.._.r.._ ~
' r
. ,
~~J
~.~
in part
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby grent~subject
Petition for Variance, upon the foliowing conditions which are hereby found to be a necessery prerequisite to the pco-
posed use oE the subject property in order to preserve the sefety and generel welface of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in conformance with plans
and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; provided,
however, that the proposed wall sign shall conform with sign requirements for the C-1 Zone.
THE FOI2EGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 12th day of Decembps~ 1968.
~ •~
~ /
CHAIRMAN ~d AHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ..
ATTEST:
~~A~~~ D~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Plnnning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
DeCembeT 2~ 1968, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS; Allred, Camp, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Rowland.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS N'HEREOF, I heve he:eunto set my hand this 12th day of December~ 1968.
C/L/'~j~~~£,4t-o/
SECRETARY ANAHEYM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 346
V2-G
_2.
~I~~ t1 -~~''~ 1 ~y.
_~ ~~. T"1'f~''., 1~~ fy - J ~: 1 .4.
.~ . ~ :. ~.. i :~. ~.~ ..~
...
` t~~ i ... ~1~ ~ . I i .. ~ ~''` A ~
; ..
i:~.. ..~. ,. ~ . ... ~ . . .
. . ~.. . . " ,... . ,, . . .... .. ,.. ..,M1 .. .' ... .
~ .. . . _.~ i . ~ . .~. .. . . , .. . . . ~ ~.. . . . . ~ m . . . I . . . , . . . .. .