PC 68-352A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2030 gg APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did teceive a verified Petition for Varience fram
DUAYNE C. PRESNTT, 846 South Hilda, Anaheim, California 92806, Parcel A, and MR. AND MRS. GEN~
FELLING, 2220 South Loara Street, Anaheim, California 92802, Parcel B
450 Eest Chapman Avenue, Orange, California 92666, Agent of certain rea~p opertyCsi~tuDated~in the~
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Parcel A: The North 120.00
f eet of the South 554.00 feet of the West half of the West half of the Northeast quarter of the
Southwest quarter of Section 28, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho Las Bolsas, as per
map recorded in book 51 page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the Orange County Recorder,
Parcel B: The North 112.50 feet of the South 434 f eet of the South half of the West half of the
West half of ihe Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of S ection 28, Township 4 South, Range
10 West, S.B.B. 8 M,
; and
WHEREAS, the City P:enning Commission did hold e pnblic hearing et the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
~~ DeCember 2~ 1968, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given es required by
law and in accocdaeoe tvith the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, 4o hear and consider evidence for
and ageinst said proposed variance and to investigete and meke finding's and recommendations in connection therewith;
and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and efter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said heating, does find and deteenine the following
fects:
1. That the petitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim Municipel Code as follows~ to establish a
one and two-story 30-unit apartment complex on subject prop~ty:
SECIION 18 28 050(5-b) - Maximum bu~7~t'na h~~~, (OnP-c+orv within 150 feet of
:~ a single-family residential zone permitted; two-storv within
•; 64 feet of an R-A Zone, on the west side of Loara Street
i~ proposed).
- i~ SECI'ION 18 28 050(6-a 4) - M'
_~ - imum build na se back from a local s r o+, (15 f ga~,
required; 12~ proposed).
SECTION 18 32 020~1) - Maximum numb r of main buildinas o build'na sit .(Maxi-
mum of two•buildinas permitted; five buildinas proposed),
: 2• That deed restrictions limiting apartment construction on Parcei "B" to one-story
<.'~ was established prior to the time site development standards were incorporated into the R-3
Zone requiring one-story construction within 150 feet of R-1 development, and that the re-
quested waiver of the one-story height limitation would only apply to R-A parcels on the
i west side of Loara Street.
3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable
to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally
to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
4. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and
denied to ~he property in question.
~ 5. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
~~ or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property
`i is located.
6. That one person from an apartment building to the north, appeared ir, opposition to
the proposed two-story construction, and that a letter in favor or subject petition was received.
,
'Vl-D,
. -1-
. =. =~,x..::.:,
~
".'a" . , ._'".... ' ~
_ ,~$ .._ ._.._._ ..
! 1
~r'
/
~~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Vaciance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use oE the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welface of the Citizens of the City of
• Anaheim.
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No.
68-69-51.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 12th day of December~ 1968.
ATTEST:
C~-~"~~ ~ ~~~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOIV
/~~Z~
SECRETARI ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Mn KTebs~ Secretary oE the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resolution was passed end adopted at e meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
DeCember 2~ 1968~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote oE the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Rowland.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of DeCember~ 1968.
~~~:YYYV /~~~C~d-?/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION