Loading...
PC 68-355t I ~/ ' I .. . ~. ;.,,,,. . " ~:- r.,.,,-e>, ' - T~,>< .. ~~ t, ~ } I _ ~ RESOLUTION 1Q0. PC68-355 ~_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING ~MMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM y RE~MMENDING TO THE CITY NUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AN AHEIM THAT ~ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT N0. 96 (READUFRTISED~) BE DISAPPROVED WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim did adopt a General Plan by Resolution No. 63R-869, showing the general description and t ~ ex ent of land uses within the City and indicating the present belief of the Council as to possible future development and redevelopment of l ~ and within the City; and ~ WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a "~, verified Petition for Reclassificetion No. 68-69-47, which petition has implicatio o l I ! ~ ns n po icies as expr~essed on said General Plan; and ~ WHERE'AS, in addition to the notice of the hearing on said reclassification, notice ~' was also given regardin the cor~sider advertised) in the general location andlvicinity of esubjecttpropertynofasaidareclassi- fication a d ~ ~ ; n WH~~, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing"in the City Hall -. in the City of Anaheim, on December 2, 1968 at 7:30 o'clock P M , . ., notice of said ~ public hearing having been duly given as r equired by law and in accordance with the provieions of the Anaheim Municipal Code t h d . , o ear an consider evidence for and against said amendment to the General Pin, and said proposed Petition for Reclassi- fication ~t i ' ,, ; o nvestigate and make findings and recommendations in connection there- ` with; and j `a-~ ~'s WHERF.~.S, said Commission after due inspection, investigztion, and study made 't. by itself and in itb behalf and aft r d ; e ue consideration of all evidence and reports ~ offered at said hearing~ DOES HEREBY FIND i i ' 1. That the present general description and extent of land uses in the ` j aforementioned area adequat ely re resents st p pa and curr ent City policies ~ ' regarding poesible future development of said gen~al ar ea described ass ; ; ' , d . ~ '' boundid'on ihe north by South Street, on the South by Ball Road ~ , ~ on the west by State College Boulevard, and on the east by Sunkist ~ i Street. ' ~ 2. That no evidence was presented at said hearing that the land use had ch~nged ' which would justify the City Planning Commission r i ecommending a change in th~ above mentioned policies to the City Council. ' i ; 3. That at a previous consideration of land use changes in this areat the Planning ;! ' Commission had determined that th e area east of 6tate College BOulevard in the vicinity of Wagner Avenue would be retained for minimum 7200 square fbot lots • or low density development. 4. That Exhibite A, B, C, D, E, and F of General Plan Amendment No. 91 do no~ constitute aQceptable alternati ves to current policies as illustrated on the ~ General Plan. 5. '~h~t six persons appeared before the Commission representing 60 persons present . r in the Council Chamber all in opposition, and that a letter of opposition was also received. I 2 ~ I ~ ~ , ~ . ` i ~ i ~ i i .~ ~ ~ ~~~.~3t ~.~~~ ~ . a ~ e ~ i ~ :`,. J i~$ ILi ,~_: C .~r. ~+~, . .. P ~ . . . . , . „ ~ . . ._~ ~~ . . . . ~ ~ . . . '!, ~1 L,1".n . _ . . . . . . . . ~ .: ~ . _ .. '_ ..'_"" ~ . . : ~ _ , . . . . . . . \ ' ._.A1 . ~ 5 i , ~ «,ri.e;~r~~,,.~M.~._.._.___..._ ..__. ' ~. '4 '. 4 • ~~ ~ , • k7CW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLUm that the City Planning Comrr,ission of the City of ' Anaheim does hereby recommend to the City C9uncil of the City af Anaheim that subject ••• • General Plan Amendment (readvertised) be disapproved on the basis of the aforementioned ~ findingse ••~-T~IE FOREGOING RESOLliTION is signed and approved by ms th3s i2th day of December, 1968. '~ ~ C-!4"A A NAF~EIM CITY P~G~G OMMISS 0 .._ I N ~`~ ATTESTs k`: ;~; a. _1~z% ~.~/ SECRETARY ANAHEI CII'Y PLFlNNING OJMMISSFON ;'~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ~'° COUM'Y OF ORANGE ) ss. ;~ CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I~ Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the forsgoing resolution uuas passed and adoptec~;a!~r•~<lmeeting of the i City Planning Commission of the City of Anatieim, held on December 2, 1968, at 7}30 o'clock ~ P.M.~ by the followi~~g vote of the members thereofc ~ AYES: NMMISSlONERSs Allred, Camp9 Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall. ; NOES: CON~NISSIONERS: Nohe. j ASSEM': COMMISSIONEr~Ss Rowland. ~ IN WIZNESS ~r'dFAEOF, I have heseunto set my hand this :2th day of December, 1966. •I :I ,.^~ ~ SECRBI'ARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ----~.:.~;.~~ r-•. !~ ~ {{.:~._ ' a i