PC 68-59~
RESOLUTION NO. ~'~68-•59
A RESOLUTION OF TNE CITY PLANNING CO~iMISS[ON Or THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C[TY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 67-68-53 gE DISAPPROVEU
~I ~
~a
,;'
' ;3
?~~
~i
~:~
n~
_~
F
t
~
~
1
WHEREAS, the City Plannine Commisslon of the Clty uf MaAein did receive e verified Petlttan for Re-
classiEicacion [rom THEODORE 0. ANDERSON, 1735 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California 92801,
Owner; JAMES E. BIRKHEIh7ER, 1717 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California 92R01, Agent of
certain real property si•~uated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as Lot Two of Tract No. 65R, as oer mao recorded in Book 20, page 36, Miscellaneous
Maps, Records of Orange County.
i ~
A'HEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public bearin~ N the City Hall in tAe Citr of Anoheim
~ Feb. ~6~ 1968, at :00 o'clodc P.M. noUcs of said pablic hearing havias been duly glvea es required by
lnr and ia accordance with the provisioaa o( tbs Aaeheia 1lsnic~Da( ~d~, CLeptav 1t.72, te 6eer ond consider
svidence [or ~nd againat seid propoaed recl~esifice:t::i end to inveatigate and~nak~ (lndin~e aadrmeomeeada~llw~s
in tonnection therewith; end
WHEREAS, said CommissIon, a(ter due lnspectlon, irvestiptioe, ~ed atudy made by itsd[ sr6 ln Its ra-
dal(, ~nd a[ter due considecatfan ot all evidence and reports offend at seid heorins, does [ind rnd detec~:aa the
[o1lo~in~ facta:
1. Thet the petitioner propoees a eeeiaui8edloa o( tbe abpre d~actibed P~y~r (~ ~ R-A, Agricultural,
Zone to the M-1, Light. Industrial, Zone to pt,mit the expansion of existing w3rehouse
:acilities on subject property.
2• Tlat the proposed reclassification is in conformance with the land use designation
of the Ge~'er,al Plan. however, due to the variety of us~=_s and zones within the area,
approval of. this request would cons'itute spot zoning.
3• rhat due to the location of existing.structure, subject property could not be
brought up to minimum standards of the M-1, Zone without relocating existing buildings.
or demolishing them and reconstructina new ones.
4. That the proposed reclassification to the M-•1, Zone in the center of five un-
developed R-A parcels would set a oattern of development for the four remaining parcels,
thereby denying the owners of these parcels the right to develop their properties to
their highest and best use.
5. That subject prope:ty was developed ti•~hile under the juriediction of the County
and the building setbacl: of 35 ieet from the riqht-of-way line along Lincoln Avenue
has not beer. obser~~ed, thus ~ pattern has been estabiisned ii the properties are
developed for industrial purposes, which would have a deleterious effect on the proper
development oi adjoining properties, since a 50-foot building setbach is required in the
M-1, Zone.
6. That the Commission nas directed the staff to study the area to determir.e whether
properties in this area should be developed fer industrial or commercial.purooses.
~~ j ~ :i~
~
1 { ;~
'
"~ _ t
,
~
:
~
'
. 7
~ .
;I ~x ;~ RD
1
~.~ ~ ~k
,., ~~
.,i 1[
,
~` ~__: -;= ._
-1-
~
i
N01V, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the pnaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City uf Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassification be denied on the basis of the
aforementioned finu'ings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this th day oi Niarchi, 1968. ~
~ i
~ ~ ~.2/i ~ -~.~ ~~~~_
( CHAIRh1AN ANAHEIh1 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
/:(-:' L~7i. ~.~ 9/,~ lf/~/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CO\7h1ISSI0\
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIhT )
I, Ann I~rebs~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City oE Aneheim, do hereby certiEy that the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City Pianning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
February 26~ 1968~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COhiMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Herbst, Mungall, Rowland, Camp.
NOES: COh1MISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: CO\iMISSIONERS: Farano.
IN WITNESS ~VHEREOF, I have hereunto set mp hand this 7th day of ~~iarch, 1908.
~ L~vz-r~~2L G~`
SECRETARP ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOId
RESOLUTION N0. 59
R2-D
-2-
t~ , . _