PC 69-1! /^
. „ Jp
RESOLUTION NO, p~69-1
, ~•.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY Pi,ANNING C01'IMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2032 BE DENIED
~
,
~~ ~R ~ .~`
WHL~EAS, the City Plenning Commiasion of the City of Aneheim did receive a veeified Petition for Vedence from
GIACOMO AND AGOSTINA LUGARO, 420 North Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, California 92801, ?wness;
STAI4DARD OIL CAMPANy, WESTERN OPERATIONS, INCORPORATED, P, 0. Box 719, Orange, California 92667,
Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of ,
California, described as the North 195.00 feet of the West 200.00 feet of the Northwest quar"ter
of the Southwest quarter of Section 7, in Township 4 South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho Los
Coyotes, as said section is shown on a Map recorded in Book 51, Page 10 of Misce'_laneous Maps,
in the office of the County Recorder of said County.
; and
WHEREAS, the Clty Planning Commiseion did hold a public heodne at the CIty Hall in the City of Anaheim on
January 13, 1969, et 4:00 o'clock P.M., natice of aeid public headng heving been duly Qiven ea required by
law end In eccordence with the provisians of the Aneheim Munirlpai Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and coneider evidence for
end egeinst said pcopoaed variance end to investigete end mekr findings ou~d recrommendation~ in connection therewith;
and
WHEREAS, eaid Commission, efter due inapection, Investigetlon, and study made by itself end in :ts behalf,
end efter due consideration of all evidence and mporta olfered at said heering, doea find end detecsnine the following
fects:
1. Thet the petitioner requests e varience from the Aneheim Municipel Code as follows, to permit the
establishment of an additiona'_ fre2-standing sign to be used as a price sign:
SECTION 18.62.090(b-11 - Maximum number of free-standinq sians. tOne free-standing
sign permitted; three free-standing sians existing and
proposed).
SECIION 18.62.090(b-1) - Minimum distance between free-standina sians. (300 feet
required; 64 and 143 feet proposed).
2. That the petitioner did not submit evidence to warrsnt the Commi.ssion's considering
subject petition favorably, since no hardshio was demonstrated that an additional :ree-standinq
sign was necessary to en.joy substantialiy the same rights as other service stations had in the
City.
3. That approval of subject petition wouid set an undesirable precedent for requests
from other service stations located throughout the City, as well as other commercial operations,
to permit additional free-standing signs, thereby negating any effect the si9n ordinance would
have on maintaining adequate signing without creating undesirable visibility distractions.
4. That the Commission could be faced ~uith processing variance requests from 231 other
service station operators which could amount to a considerable expense for the City, while the •
oil company could resolve their pr~sent predicament by redesigning the existing 26 signs s'o that
they are not advertising siyns, per se, at less expense than the City would incur in processirtg
231 variance petitions.
5. That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumsta~ces or conditions applicable
to the propert•y invoved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to
the property o.r. class or use in the same vicinity and zone.
VI-D' -1-
~
. . ' . . i .I .' :. .. '; • ~. ~.4i~t.~-r }i}, ~
~.~.~
.~, .rs----~----^----~--_°~.:~..:,... .,.._ . ~ .
~
. .. .. ... . .. .. ~. . _ . . .. ...~. . . .. .
y•`''
\i
fi.i i 1
S
~~ b
;;. r.
,.+~ -
:~ ~
~i ~
~
t~
'~ ~
~~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Variance on the besis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 23rd day of January, 1969.
c-~~ ~' ~ 4~c /'!/~ CA~~~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMh4ISSION
ATTEST:
i ,
~~ ' y^ j ..~YZ( C~i
SECRETARY ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CRLIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Kr ebs ~ Secrett~ry of the City Plenning Commission of thc City of Aneheim, do heceby certify thet the fore-
going resolution was passed and e3opted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
January 13, 1969~ at 4:00 o'clock p,M„ by the foilowing vote of the members thereot:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Farano, Gauer, F~erbst, Roviland.
NOEC: COMMISSIONERS: Non e.
ABSENT: COI~tMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of January, 1969.
./.~ ,._-' /,
-~(-'? % i //2r [';-~ '
s
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 1
V2-D _Z_
'~
_ ~j
_~.
. :~.,. ,,, .. ,,,.,..,. .: ................. .a,.-.~~~:..>..~..,,~,.,~-.. .
_._... _........ _„~....,... . .
•:,. ,.~ . .... ...,.,.:.~_..,. .,_~.,....-._,..p.u„-:m..~...-....,,,-.~..•.....y.... .
. _ .._.'J - . _._._
~-.~. ~ .. . ~'Yj~". ~ i .
~ ' .
h
. . _ _ ~ ~~ ~ ' _