Loading...
PC 69-10T:,' {::. ~I ~l": t t, 4 _ i p: 4~ ~` RESOLUTION N0. p~69-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ,pLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITION FGR VARIANCE NO. 2044 gg APPRO'!ED E• WHEREAS, ~e City ?lanning Commission ef the City of Aneheim did receive e verified Petition for Variance from A. HFNJ:;r'RLIN(3, 114 North Coffman Avenue, Anaheim, California 92805, and BEN J. RIZZOTTO, 2322 , South Pullman, Santa Ana. California 92705, Owners; ARNpUR BUILDiNG CON~PANY, P. 0. Box 3236, Anaheim, CaliFornia 92803 A of Oran~ S + 9ent of certain real oroperty situated in the City of Anaheim, Cour.ty 3e, tate of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached he:eto and ref erred to herein ~T as though set forth in full : ~: ; end WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on January 27, 1969~ et 2:00 o'cloc~ P.M., notice of said public hearing hevin bcen dul : lew end ln eccordaace with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipa! Code, Chepter 18.b8, to hear and cons der eviden eafor and again::t said proposed varianca and to investigete end meke findings end recom~e detions in connection therewith; artd ~ j ~ WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itself and in its behalf, and efter due consideretion of all evidence and reports offered at seld hearinq, does find and determine the following fects: 1. Thet the petitioner requests e veriance from thE Anaheim Municipel Code as follows, to develop a 694-unit apartment complex on subject property: SEGTION lg 2g pg0(5-b) - Maximum buildin hei ht within 150 f eet of sinale-familv zoned propertv. R-q ,(O~ne-~st~ory permitted; approximately 72 two-storv units propos~.d). r SEGTIO~J 18 ?8 050(6-a-1) - Minimum struc ural setback from a secondarv street. (20- - feet required, carports and patios within -~fg~ proposed). SEGTION iB,ag p p(6-a 4) - Minimum s~ructural sQ+h~~4 from a 1oca1 str p+. (15-~ rrquired, patio fences within 5_~ proposed). SEC1'ION 18 28 050(6-b 3) - Minimum reouired side vard (carport location). 5-feet ~ ; required; 0-~ proposed). . SECTION 18 2A 050(7-a) - Minimum distance between buildin s(several instances.) SECTION 18.98_o~n(~_~) -~nimum width of o ~estrian nassaoewav. (8-feet required; I!' several instances at -~ proposed). SEG1'ION 18 28 050(g-b) - M rimum distance of livina units from ~ (200 pE t c~~aridard stre t, _g_ permitted; 10 uni.ts r~reater than 200 f ee± proposed). SECI'IO1J 18,Og.440 - Requirement that a oarcel of land abut at l~ast one oubl;r ~ , str2et or allev. - 2. That the i:ommission grants Variance t4o. 2044, except foz those waivers either vaith- drawn or denied as indicated below for Phase I onlv, and denied the request that said waivers also apply to Phases II and II7, on the basis that plans of development were submitted in detail for Phase I unly, and blanket approval of waivers, wherein 694 dwelling units are proposed on the entire 29-acre parcel, might set an undesirable precedent. 3. T;,at waiver of the one-story height limitation v~ithin 150 f eet of the R-A parcel to the west, which General Plan Amendment :do. 97 depicts as being appropriate for k-~-5000 or low- medium density, is hereby denied un the basis that the Commission has approved the variance requests for Phase I only. ~:} ~ ~ 1 , .; ~~ ` , ;~ f , ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~~ .. J . ~ ~. = .:l':'~'FC~, i'Fl~.f'~1.\~ ~ i.i."!"'.~.i ~ ~:.h:` :siii~l~LV~I~ !',i:~'.~I~~ ._. ~:)I~.~~l_..~i~U L.O. ! , i '...~I'.i.: ~.;•,~~ ~ . ~,~ . ' , .. .;.!..~I'~~. r ' ~ ~~ i f'... ~~i.l~f f:. ~.. 1',J~..~.. ~~\~; ~..2 Ct.57 ll!JCOLh l.YCNUC • ~ ' .~ ~~~!' ~' {'HONE ~7~~,••t.~1~~1'~ CALIFOR'VIA ~~UOJ -~~ 77.:.17G3 . r '~ J ~;..~~. y y '' "_ _ .'r i', I .: '/~ ~ `~ p c~:s~: ~ ~~~ •` ~i ~ ; i ~~. ~ . ;:; : ,•r , .._,,. ',11 t~rr ,:••r'.oir: l,~~r1 ,i Cic: .. i~,rii:i,i, .,.ri ~~ ' in .d~•..,.,i~;. , C.oii ;r.,i,i ~ru ..~ i ~ ~ t. y_, , n:y ~,f Gr, c r P.;~;~,_ ,,,,,~ TEnrT, T,~?.. ~oP4.~ • A~~~r~io;~ nr L.~t I i.~ 'i? _~; r:•c~~r-1~:., i~; .ino~; _` . 'r .li•- ~'l~~:n S:_. . i~~.. rc~~,nt,~~.,1 ~ i~ _Jµ, ~~, i'.. ll, ~r;'i t/~ i'I ~i. ~i idt .... ~,~ t,ic ~. ~.~i ~l ~~ (1~ ~;i{ ~ ,,, . :.~ f:...i,f:~ i'I Ufr''~ i.. ~.•;i~,nin,~ .tt a pnin: i. ~ r.:~r.C lin,• ~nuCit~:n•'~i;~fly ~„ ~ „ . !.~ :i i I.nl i :.~~ ; .. ' . fr, ' ;( l'~ I;~i~., :1: . . ~ •i.i: '.:i. , ~ti. qlfih~:,'',C"`` r1~ ,,~~ri,.~~r,~ia~. ~,,,,Iri~' ri ~"i'`,~:I.ll~.:,i~. .~;.t' .•( ., .i.;_ i,:~:i ~n ~ ~ '(~C.r: l ~ ~. i " 1',. ,~ in fin.~l orJ,:r ~~t i.i,,~-I~iati i; ~`>'t,.~rl; li .;.r .iJ i~,r._f~ ..ril~'..1~ 5oul'li ]~~' ~;,~ l~i" Uc:~~ :~ ' i. t„ i~~~~ S t,.11 (._ ~~,~, . . CI i~..t; Li~:~ .. $!;~~1:, ~. - , L .~:. i tli~_nc~1 ~~icC[~t ~',I. ~~1•~ •~t~~i.l, l~~ ~, ~~)~,~~ ~: ~,. . 1i~ :)1~' L~1' • ..t • ' ~ .i. , . • ~ ~~. y.~ ) _..~ L~ '~: I: ~1'LI~ r, . ~ ~ ~C~',! _ ~v~..~. •,~. ;1~~ ~,~~ • J` l~J ~11'~ ~~l_^ ~ f.J'~i C011,~~.'l:.c~ri)~ I~lu~:.~~(1..~,1 l•. I• Yl~~.n~~... !~~~~ft,•~:t,•(..,%1 ~,~. :~ r;i.ir, i.~~ Lr~.. t ~.. :utf• :~stcrll ' r~,~.r ; ,j '~~ ~ ,.t ::; ~ ~ '~~~~~'~ ~'~,. .J:~ICf~'~ ~It:_ .r ~~ ~~~~t ~ ~~'..~i. . 'f:li ,. ~.:~ ~ ~ ._. 'i.i L~•l I~ li ~7. '` . ~. (, C,~nCaini~iJ l;i.l?j i,_~ __, ... . ir i ~ir;t ~~i , _.;i: ,i~ ~ ~°°S.s'T:, ~ f. r • 4 4. That waiver of Section 18.U8.440, was withdrawn by the petitioner, since a condition of approvzl of Tentative Map of Tract No. 6843 required the extension of a dedicated 20-foot alley to the pazcel to the south on which no development is presently proposed. 5. That under the authority of Section 18,68.060, waiver of the one-story height limitat;on +Nithin 150 feet of ±he R-p property to the east is hereby aranted, on the basis that said property is adjacent to the flood control channel and due to its size and shape it will undoubtedly develop for use other than single-family residential. h. That the requested variance, as granted, is necessary for the preservat:on and enjoyment of a substantial p:ope.^ty right possessed by other properties developed for multiple- ~ family uses. 7. That the requested variance, as granted will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such ~~icinity and zone in which the property is located. ''~~ S. That the petitioner is advised that, by Resolution, the City Council has determined ~ buildine following park a~d recreation fe~, shall be applicable and payable at the time the 9 permit i; issued: 1) Issuance o~ a building p~r,nit on or prior to May 1, 1969 -$2g per dwelling u~it; or 2) Issuance of a bui?ding permit subsequent to M~y 1, 1969, -$75 per dwelling unit. 9. That ';he Commission rncommends to the City Council that standazd street ir~provement , requirements bc amended to permit installation of sidewalks adjacent to the curbs of all streets within th's Phase; this recommendation being based on the fact that area normally having a parkway ma; then be incorporated into the front setback area thereby creating a laraer landscaped area. 10, That the owner of a large acreage abutting subject property to the west, appeared in opnosition to blanket approval of the requested waivers for the entix•e parcel. NOIN, THEREFORE, BE IT R~FSOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commitsion does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the s~fety and gen?ral welFare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. 1. 7hat this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 68-69-13. 2. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 3. That all streets vrithin the development shall be constructed in accordance with standard plars and specifications on file in the office of the City Enaineer, except that the sidcrralks may be located adjacent to the curbs, provided that the sidewalks are offset to the rear of fire hydrants on all streets and utility poles on Frontera Street. 4. That a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of a 6-foot masonry wall along all property lines where required by Code. 5. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent rasidential homes. 6. That Condition Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance vaith plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. 8. That ordinances recl8ssifying the property shall be adopted as each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaininq to such parcel; provided, however, that the wora "parcei" shall mean presently existin9 parcEls of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split. 9. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim park a~d recreation f~es for each dwelling unit~ as required by City Council resolution, which shall be usEd for park and recreation purposes, said artrount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. ~ ; ~AS. wo. ~u ~ ~ ~ f` ~ • ' ~ ~~ ~ ' TfiE FOREGOI~G RESOLUTION is signed and approved b ~ y me this 6th day of FF~~uary 1969. I ~ 'l c ~ ' ATTEST: CAAI AN A~HE1M ITY PLANNING^~MMISSIOA7 ~I ~ /%Z-ZZ-vL~.. i ' ~ / ' SrCRETARY ANAHE M C TY PLANNING ` ~I~ ~ CONJ'dISSION (,;;. ~ ^~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) :~~ CnUN'TY OF ORANGE ) ss. '~' CT7Y OF ANAHEIM ) ' ;: T, Ann Krebs, Secretar~ ~ hezeby certify that the foregoi~gtresolutionawasn9 C~~ission of the City of Anaheim ~o ~;' Planning Commission of the Cit passed and adopted at a meeting of the City '~ by the following vote of the membersnthereofsel~ on January 27 1969 ~ ' ~ ~ , at 2:00 0 clock P.N,, rt A~j COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Farano, Gauer, Thom. ? NOESs COMN,ISSIONERS: Herbst. ABSEM': COMA,iSSIONFRSs Rowland. IN WITNFSg yyy~EGF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of Februar Y. 1969. . ~f'', . ' `~:. ~,_ .~ SECREI'pRy ANAHEIM CITY PLqlJNING COMMISSIOII Res. 'Jo. 10 :.'; i ~ ~7 ~ ' ~ ~ E': ~~ , --..., ~