PC 69-101~ l.
RESOLUTIOI~'EdO. pC69-101 ,,y
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNIIVG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDWG TO THE CITY COiTNCIL OF~y CITY OF ANAHEA! THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 6B'~9'92 BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the CIty oE Anaheim did receive a veriEied Petition for Reclessifica-
tlon fmm LA SALLE DO'i~VNEY INDI~TRIAL PROPERTIES' 9350 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills,
California 90212, Owner; ALLAN Io NEMIROFF, 9538 Erighton Way, Beverly Hills, California
902i0, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Qrange,
State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and TP.f9i;;?d to herein as
though~set rorth in full.
; and
WHEREAS, the City Pl~nnina ComRission dld hold e public headng et the City Hell In the CIty ot Anaheim on
May 19~ 1969~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice o( seld public hearln havin been dul
law and in eccordance with the pwvistons of the Mahtlm Municipal Code, Ch pter 18.72, to hear and onslderev3dence
for and egalest seid ptoposed teclasslfication and to investigete and meke flndings end recommmdationa in eonnecdon
therewith; end
WHEREAS, said Commission, etter due inspection, investigaHon, end study made by itself and in ita behelf, and
eftm due consideratIon of ail evidmce and reports offered et seid hearIng, does find and determine the following fects:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the above described pcoperty from the County of Orange
100-M1-20,000, Light Industrial District, to the City of Anaheim, R-A, Agricultural, Zone.
2. Tt:at ~he proposed reclassification is in confor^:ance ;vith the Gen~ral Plan.
3. That the propoeed reclaasiflcatfon of subject property is necesaery end/or desirable for the orderly end pro-
per development of the community.
4. That the proposed recleseiHcation of aubject ~~roperty does properly relete to the zones end their permitted
uses locally eatabltshed in cloee proximity to subject propecty and to the zones end their permitted uses generelly esteb-
lished throughout the communlty,
5. That the p=oposed reclass±fication of subject property requires the dedication
and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation L-lement of the General
Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the intensification
of land ~~;e.
R-A
-1-
_._..,
*-
_:~+':~6-_., :
~ ~ r~
s~
,_ .
. __ _ _ _
estce • , _
:.k SALLi: - D047t~1iY I11DUS~RIAL PNQPI:FTII:S, r~ co-partncrsh~~.
~~T~~ ~~
~
. ~~ < <
~~ >>
' ~'~`' -++.~-^-~Ttt"To m th~s report is in thc state of California, county of Orange "-"` ~
Tho.e portlon^ of' T.ots 20 and 21 Sn l~lock K o}' thc Y,racr~cr '"rnct,
in the Countv of' (~ranre, Stntc of Ca].i!'ornia, ns rer r~t~r recorded
in boob: 1?~ nares £~7 and fifi of "11sc~llaneous Records, in the of'Pice
o,^ ~he countv recorder aP Lo:; AnPele:> Count~~, C~lifbrnil, described
a~ rolloors:
i'er,lnninr~ at the m~~:>t l~!esterl~~r cerner oi' said Lot 21 and runninc*,
':her.ce ''orth 2P° Sa' 3~a" T:ast nlon~* the Abrthr~e:,terl;/ line of 3aid
: ct, 73~' . ~~~ f'c~et to the eenterllne oP La Palm:t Avenu~, bein~ h0. QO
faeL in r:idth, as c~nveYed to the Countv of' Oranr~e, bp deed recor~led
l:,,ril 2, 1~ ~,~~~2t~,y ~Y. 231, ~aRe 232 of Deeds oP ~nid Or~nPe C~untv;
thencc t;o ~~~ r~ s° b~F~~~qO" F:a:,~~ alonr, said centerline~ ~~-3.97. Peet
~ tc thc r: ~' t',~?er3;:,~1y~" orner of :,11d Lot 2Q; thence ttlon~ the P7orth-
i•~e:,Lerl)~ 11nc'~o~.c~;,~id;r.ot ?C t~nrtii 73° 02' 00" Last 11~13.G~ feet
to tt;~ t: r;tne~~:~;t corn~r of' t};e land conveved to Tex~co Tnc., a
De.iaware corr~oriir,~~on .; fi,/ @c.ed recorded July 17, 1~C3, in hook GG33 ~
' ~ par;e tt3~ ~,`Off'icia,~„~'teeord3; bhr,~z~ae 3bussh 16° 55~ 30" i;a,t 253.00 feet .
~ tc Li;~: :'o;, h~;c~... c. G.c. ., _~ ~,• !;~rnc~ :~lor.r Lhe ^otiL~hcrlp li~tc
;nid _; ;~i, '. . " ~`, . ' ; ." :., .,, . .', ~n r,•oY, t:~ a n01nt in the or
~ t.,c:~r,<r •,~- :;o;:.. .,., ~ c.^ ~.1;~• : , ~ .., ;,•,.-.v~d r,c, t;'r~,e :,Lat^ of California, bv
~ dec~:, •r•corc:~.,. , ~l: - ~, :`~I ?, ~t~ ..or~1' %~~?~~~ {):~nn ?t~~i of Off'1C111
nCCQi"., ;~ ;;ilti: S~G!.1~': };Ui~li' 1;}~!! liC?j':I1I1~11f~ Oi~ :i f70tl~tanrant C117'VC CQI'1CAVC
• ~; ;1~rti:~::: ,tcrl~r 1nc1 iiavir;r, a r,ir,iu:> of?_,,'.f;l .~~ f`r.et• anc9 a radlt~l bcarin~
~' ~r `~=d ''°in~ ~~ :TortM 'l~° 31' ~~" i:a^L; thence alon~* ~aid l~le~terly
• :.c~unciar;t or ;aid la:,t r~ent-ioned dced thc fblloorinr* cour;,es an~l distances;
thenct: ^outhea~tcrl;~ alon~ ~aid curve L•hrouph n central Zndle oP 5° 0!~~
4~1" an arc di:;tance o,^ 1~$.?9 J'eet to the end of s11d curve; thencc
~o~ith ~;° ?~~ ;~r)~~ i?1:,t 15~,~i8 f~et; Lhence Sotit-h i° 30' 13° ld~st 1?.5.33
~ feet; ti~ence "otith ~O 1~' 4~I" Yle;at ?a7,Oq feet.; thence Sotith 23° 00' 13"
''~~~~ 7'.7.5 feet Lo a noint ln the ttorthvresterlv Loundarv of Lhe 11nd
fcrlnLed to Lhe State oJ' Ca].i~ornia, Up deed, recorded Julp 19, 19Gfi in
' booi: ~~~3, n1~ce 295 of Of,^ic].al ?~ecords; thence alonr*, said tlorthiaesterl~
~ 1~ounn~ ry Lhe rollol•~inn courses ~nc: distlnces; thence ~:otibh ~12° ?0' 20"
.ax ':;est i~~1.~3 *eet; thence ^nuth (>3° Oj~' 32" lde~t 10E3,G8 feet; Lhenr,c
~°1~~" ~~° ~~' 2~~" ~'.e,st 3~5.0~3 fect to a noint in the Southerly linr. of
r.=~1~3 ?.o~ 21; tnence alonr. :aid .~outherlv line South t~l° ~10' ,A° l•;est
7~~•E~ ;'eet to an znRle noint th~rein; Lhence 1lorth G1° 31~ 37" iti'est,
alon~; tne Southt•ie;,terl,~ ltne of' said Lot 21, 735.~I~ feet to the poinC
of bec-inninr*.
,... .___ ,... ---------_-__._...~_______. ~~ ._. -
___----~ ~.._.~ ~----- --
,_`-~„~ _ -.. ..._ , . . ... ,,,„
~~
..,~ ~
ii
:~
_~
NOW, 1'HEREFORE, HE IT g~ ~LVEL'I ;.4~~t tbe AneS~;;; C;~; k.i~~,.~1~,:. ~~ission doea hereby recommend
to the C;ty Council of the City of ~~heim that subJvsi p~~.!„„ fo~ ~,~. ~,ri6cation be •
t6~t Title 18-Zontag of the Maheim Municip~l Code Iw amen6ed ~, PProv'~ end, by so doing,
County 100-M1-20,000, Light Induatrial Dist;3.r_t, and~tc~i.naorporat~e said ~esacp~ibed p operty
into the R-A, Agricultural, Zone, i.ipon the tr,ilowiny coad:":iors which are hereby found to
b•~ a necessary prerequisite to the proposea use of subject property in order to p:eserve the
saFety and general welfare of the Citizer,s of the C:~,ty of Anaheim.
1. That this reclassificatien is gxant~d ~ubjeccto completion o: the annexation of the
subject proparty to the City of Anahei,h.
2. That the owner of subject properL}• s'';d51 cicCd to the City of Anaheim a strip of land
32 feet in width from the centerline of tha ;t~:eeL a(,~;g White Star Avenue, for street
widening purposes.
3. That street impro~~ement plans shall be p.ren~red and all engineering requirements of
the City af Anaheim along La Palma Avenue, Nlhit~ S;.•.r Avenue, and Kraemes Soulevard, such as
curbs and gutters,sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurte-
nant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer anci in accordance with standard
plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; and that a bond in an
amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee
the installation of said engineering requirements.
4. That the owner of subject property shall install street lignting along La Palma Avenue,
N'hite Star Avenue, and Kraemer Boulevard, as required by the Director of Pubiic Utilities and
in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of
Public Utilities; and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim
shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said street lighting.
5. That the owner of subject property shall pay Lo the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ pe:
front foot along La Palma Avenue, White Star Avenue, and KraemPr Boulevard, for tree planting
purposes.
6. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and A, above mentioned, shal] be complied with withir a
period of 180 days from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant.
THE FOREGOING F2ESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this 29th d•ay of F~ay, 1969.
~
~ /~
~~1ti~i c~s'r ~l/~ ~.-~f~ t~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAN'NING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
/ =~ i
,~f -J-[.-2~t_ ~/~i ,!_~ ~j~~'
SECRETARY ANAHEIM Cy:'Y F't.,yy~~G CriMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIp )
COUNTY OF ORAAIGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEI'N )
I, Ann Y.rebs, ~c:et
the torcgoing resoluN.on was pass ~ d e~optedyepe~meetgi g o! theiCIty pl~anning Commissfon of the City of Aneheim,
held on May 15, 1 y69, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the foilowing vote of the members thereof:
AYP~~ COMMISSIONERS: Farai~o, ~?aur,r, Herbst, Rowland, Thom, Allred.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Nore.
ASSENT: COMMiSSIONERS: Camp.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto eet my hend th~s 29th day of May, 1969.
~~r
RESOLUTION NO. 101
~ ' R2-A
.~x
~ %~~ L:u!~~~ l~_
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
: 2-