PC 69-109i.
T
~~
~ . ,a -_'~
RESOI.UTION N0. ~'~69-:.09 '
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNIIdG COMB'IISSIOiV OF' THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
1'HAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO._ 2089 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Clty Planning Commission of the City of Maheim did receive a verified Petition for Varience
from SECURITY TITLE INSURRNCE ~MPANY, 825 North Broadway, Santa ,Ana, California 92701, Owner;
Rl6SELL MC Caleb, 3350 North Central Avenue, Suite 723, Phoenix, Arizona 85012, Agent of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as Lots 1 through 7, inclusi.ve, of the R-~gier Subdivision, as shown on a Map
recorded in Book 6, page 37, Miscellansous Maps, records of Orange County, and Lots 4, 5, 7,
9, 12, 13 and 14, in Block C of Davis Brothers Ada~tion to Ar.aheimy as shown on a Map recorded
in Book 2, pages 632 and 633 of Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County. EXCEPTIIJG from
said Lots 12, 13 and 14, the Westerly 10.00 feet now included within Harbor Boulevard, formerly
Palm Street.
; and
WHCREAS, the City Planning Commisslon did hold a public hearing at ffie City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on May 19, 1969, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearin hevin 6een dul
by law end in accordance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Charrter 18.68, to hear andeconsideruev a
dence for end egainst said proposed veriance and to investiqate and meke findings and recommendetions in connection
therewith; end
WHEREAS, saiti Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, end study made by itself and in its behalf,
and after due consideration oE ail evidence and reports offered at said heuring, does find and detecmine the follo wing
fects:
1. That the petitioner requests o veriance from the Anaheim Mtu~icipal Code as follows ~ to permit the
establishment of a 10-story office structure on subject property.
SECTION 18.38.050 4- Off-street parkinq.
(540 spaces required; 451 sAaces
Proposed).
ti:
i
F~ ~
" I
's
G, ..
';
;~
, i
~; {
;~~ .~
~' ' l
2. Thet there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstences or conditions appliceble to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generelly to the property or class of use in the seme vicinity and
zone.
3. That the requested veriance is necessery for the preservation end enjoyment of a substantiel property right
possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property ;n question.
4. Thet the requested verience will not be meterially detrimentel to the public welfare or injurious to the prop-
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is loceted.
5. That the petitioner stipulated to the construction of parking structure fourdations
sufficient to support a fifth level of parking, although 4-stories or levels are to be con-
structed at the pre~e;,t time.
Vl-G
.~.
_._.~
~
I . • ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby foand to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welf.are of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclzssification No.
65-66-62.
2. That trash Storage area~ shall be provided in acco*dance with approti•ed plans on file
wi±h the office of th~ Director of Public Works.
3. That fi•re hydrants shall be installed as required and dete*mined to be necessary by
the Chief of the Fire Departmeni.
4. That the sidewalks, ~urbs and gutters shall be removed and/or reconstructea along
Broadway, Helena Street and Elm Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance
a with standard plans and specificatinn= on filein the office of the City Engineer.
~ 5. That any air-conditioning facilities proposed shall be pxOperly shielded from view,
and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent residential homes.
6. That any parking a*ea lighting shall be lighted with down-lighting a maximum 5-fee~~
in height and shall be directed away from the property lines to protect the residential
integrity of the area.
7. That a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City o` Anaheim shall be
posted to guarantee construction of a 5th storv, if within 30-36 months after issuance of a
Building Permit the City, upon review of the parking situation around subject property,
determines that additional parking in con~ormar.ce with parking requirements of the C-0,
Commercial Office, Zone shoulr3 be provided.
8. That the pe'titioner shall provide employee parking, either on-site or off-street
parking within 750 feet of subject property.
9. That Condition Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, above mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to final buildina and zoning inspections.
10. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accor;;ance with plans
and specifications on file wi~h the City of Ar.aheiin, marked cxhibit P~os. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ano
6, provided however, that the proposed parking struct+are foundati~n shall be auequate to
support a 5-story structure.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 29th day of May~ 1969.
i /~
" _ ~ ~ ~ 7~/~ ~-o-~.~-e-'L.
CNAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
L/L~22~2/ /,~C -~~ /
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary ot the City Plnnning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet the tore-
going resolution wes passed and edopted at a meeting of the City Planning Com mission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
May 19, 1969, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Gauer, Farano, Herbst, Thom, Rowland, Allred.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COh1MISSIONERS: Camp.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hnnd this 29th day Of May~ 1969.
(/GiJ~Z~J (_,~ /~'7 (_.~I..~C'/
~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CONMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 109
' V2-G
~ -2-
~ ~
+ry....
~ .