PC 69-121;:[
T,'.
z',''
r ~
PC69-1?1
RESOL,UTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 2~92 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Pienning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Vadance
from DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, P, 0~ Box 3760, Fullerton, Cali:ornia 92634, Owner
of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Qrange, State of California,
described as Lot Nos. 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, and 43 of Tract Noo 6820
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Hall in ffie City of Aneheim
on June 2, 1969~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required
by lew and in e~cordance with the pmvisions of the Maheim Municipa! Code, Chaptet 18.68, to hear and consider evi-
dence for and against seid pmposed varience and to investigete and make findings and recommendettons in connection
therewith; end
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, end study mede by itself end in its behelf,
end after due consideaeUon of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find end detecmine the following
facts:
1. That the petiUoner request3 a variance from the Maheim Municipal Code: with waiver of SeCtion
18.24.03U(1-a) - Minimum front yard setback. (25 feet required; 20 feet proposed).
2. That there are exceptionel or extraordinary circum stances or conditians epplicable to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property thet do not apply generelly to the property or clase of use in the seme vicinity and
zone.
3. Thet the requested veriance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of e substential property ri t
posseased by other ptoperty in the same vicinity end zone, and denied to the propetty in q,uestion. ~
4. That the requested verience will not be materially detrimentel to the public welfere or injurious to the pmp_
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
5. That approval of the variance as requested would provide front yards on subject
parcels consistent with the remainder of the subdivision and would provide greater separation
between subject property and the R-1 tract to the east.
6. That one person ap~eared in opposition.
Vl-G
-1-
_ _ _ .__
_ ___....._
, _- _
_ __. _ _
, _ __ _.
~. ..
~ ) 1
; -
~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Variance, upon the tollowing conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
`+ posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safet} „nd general welfere of the Citizens of the City of
j Anaheim.
f 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Rec].assification No.
66-69-55.
~ 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
~, and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit No. 1.
,
THE FOREGOiNG RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this 12th day Of June~ .1964.
~! i ~/~~,~~
CHAIRMAN NAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMAIISSION
~'.~ ~
~~ ~~
ATTEST:
~ /, J 7
SECRETARY~ANAHEIM CIT PLANNING COMMISSION
'I PRO- TEM ~_-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~ Lee Bur ess
I+ ~~. Secretary of the City Plenning Commission o[ the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
going resolution was passed and adopted at a mecting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
June 2~ 1969~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Farano, Gauer, Herbst, Thom, Rowland.
NOES: COMh115SI0NERS: (Jone.
ABSEN'f: COMMISSIONERS: Camp,
IN WITNESS WHER~CIF, I h~ve hereunto set my hand this 12th day of 3une~ 1969.
~ ~ % ~1
' ~ ~ ~n ~ 2, ~
SECRETARY~ANAHEIM CIT~ LANNING COMMISSION
- RESOLUTION N0.121 pR0-TEN t
~2-G
-Z-