PC 69-143RESOLUTI~h' NO. _ - "= "':' :; -..+~
___.__ ."_____-.___ ~
A RESOLUTTON OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSYON OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDWG TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C1TY OF hNAHEIM THNT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. ~'8'6`=-O~ gE bppxUVEU
WHEREAS, the City Planning Cammiasion of the City of Anaheim did recelvic e verificd Petttion for Reclnsstfica-
tlon from MARIE E, BORCHARD ESI'AI'E, TH017AS E~ HEFFERI~AM~ °XECL`T0~?, 350 c„t _9th Street, Costa
Mesa, California 92627, Owner; DOWNEY S~VIIJGS AND LOAN HS~uC:AT10,';, BG;~ ~a;t r:orence, Do~neyy
California 90240, Agent of ce:tain real pronerty situate;i in the City of Ar,ah~iin, Gount, oi
Orange, State of California, described as that portion of the land ailotted to cd;;a_;;o Poliorcro
in Decree of Partition o: the Rancho Santiaao Le Santa Ana, rer.Gez~ed ir. Case l~oo ~i;~2 ;no en~_::
September 12, 1t368~ in Book "B" Page 410 of Judgments o° the 1'th Judical District Court oi
Californiao Beginning at a point East 281032 feet from the common corne* of Sections i; 2, ;;
and 12, Tormship 4 South, Range 9 N'est, thence ;dorth 2137.52 feet i:o thc centErlinu ot tr.e Sant=
Ana l'alley Irrigation Company's canal: thence r,orth,~asterly alung s~id centeriir.e to thE no~th-
east corner of the 25 ac*e tract o: land described in the deed to Leo 9orcharr re:ord~d k,_il 2:',
1920 in Book 359 Uage ~il of Deeds o.' said County; thr.r,ce S outn ~31~~~_ ' `~
of sa_d 25 acre tract to tne southezst corner of sa? ~5 =E`-t c:long thc east lin~_
to the point of be i d acre tract: thence ~u~=5t 613~9"7 feFt
9'nning, Except that por±ion tt,ereoi '_ying nortt~erly o: tne southerly iir~r o:
the land described in the Dee9s to the State of Califoin's recordec April )9, 194£? in i'ook 1~t6
Page 341 of Official Records of said County and recorded Auaust ~1, ]y46 ir cook :695 Laae G5
of said Ufficial Records~ -
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public heering et the City Hell ir, thr. Clty of Anaheim on
June 'G, 1969, at 2:OU o'clock Y.M. notice of seid public he~ring heving been duly given es rea~~;~ed by
Iww ~d In ~ecordence wlth the provisions of the qneheim Municipal Code, Chepter ltl.7~, to herr and consid,er evidencc
for and aQainat said proposed reclaasi(icetion and to investisete and m+k• tindingr rn~ r~commnidqt~ona in connection
therepith; and
WHEREAS, s~id Commiseion, efter due inapectlon, investigation, and study m~de by itset( end in its behalf, end
after due coneideratlon of al] evidence and repores otfered at said hearine, doea find and determine the followi~g Eacts:
1. Thet the petitioner proposes a rtcleaal[ication o[ the above described property from ihe R-A, Ag: i cu; tura 1,
Zone to the R-i9 One Family Resi~lential, Zone.
2. That the proposed .eclassificatio^ is in confo;i,,r,c~, vith ~nc ~3en~.rai Plan.
3. Thet the proposed recleselficetlon ot eubject propedy is nece:~sary unej,'or iesirs,ble (or the orderly end pro-
per devetopment of the eommunity.
4. 'fhat the propoaed eeclassiflcotion nt yubjrc~ proprKy d„rr ~,,,~,a~ „ ~~ };;~.. .,, ~y~„ ~,,~~,.,. ^nd their permitted
uses locelly establiahed in close proximlty to subject property end lo the zoneu end their permlt~ed uses generol~•~ esteb-
liehed throughout ti~e community.
`~. ~r~1: ~h~ ~ir~noserl rer,lassi'ic~tio~ o~ :;~_;!~,°,,.•
i.mprovement of abuttiny straets .n acro-;;,~nce v~ith tire Circulation~~El~ment,of'the'Gen~^a.:r1':ar.,
~ue to the anticipated inr,.ease ;n txaffic whicn ~Nfll he nenerate~i by the int.ensitir,ation o!
lan~l usc.
R-A
•~-
._.._.~
,T _ _.
_ _ _-- ,.
,,:
,;,,
.
` • NOW, TAEREFORE, BE IT; j,SOLVED th~t the Anaheim City Pl~nni~ ~ jJommia~ion does hereby :ecommend
] to the CIty Council of the City of ~Aneheim that eubJect petltlon tor Racl~r~illc~tion be ~ppcove~ ond, by ao doing,
i
~ that Title 1&Zoning of the Anaheim Municlp~l Code be amended to ezclude the sbovr deacribed property [rom the
~ R-A, Agricultural, Zone9 and to incorporate said described prooerty into the R-IS O~e••~
j Family Residential, Zone, upon the foilowing conditions which are hereby iound to be a nec-~
~ essary pierequisite to the proposeu ose of subject property in o:dE~~ to preser~.-e the safety
. and general ivelfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheimo
1. That a Final Tract Nap of subject property be anproved Fiy the r,ity Council and
.recorded in the office of the 0*~ange Cour.ty Recorder.
E 2, That the owner of subject property shall pay cc the City of Anaheim pa_~ and
: recreation fees of $125 per dwelling unit, as required by City Council Resolution9 which
r shali be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paic at the time the
' Building Permit is issued.
1
L~,
.lT.~ r
'.~ + 11
.!~.~,~~ I .I
I .
~:
`,.
V
:~
~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is sip,ned and approved by me this lOth da;; of July, ]?69.
i
,~ _
E~ 2~1 ~'._.2ri-~~~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISS(ON
~.~ ATTFST:
,~ ~~"' ~ /
~.,~ / .f .!t.,L~J~-t: ~ ~(~ :G/~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMI5SION
STATE OF CALiFORNIA )
I COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss,
~ CITY OF ANAHEIM )
r
I~ Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commissir~n of the City nf Anehcim, du hcreby ccrti(y thet
the foregoing tesolution was pessed er,d adopted at e meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim,
held on June 30~ 1969' at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the mernberr: thercof:
~l . AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Gauer, Herbst, Thom~ Allred.
~
' NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~~oneo
i
I
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, Farano, Rowland.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this l Oth day of Ju 1 y, 1959.
•~ ~ i ~ ~~' J I..~'t- '~~~C-'l~ ~
_ SECRETARY ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ ; RE50LUTION N0. 143
~ ~ ~ R2_q ^
~3 (