PC 69-162~._, - _ _ ,
1, ~ -
~
RESOLUTION NO. P~~'`~`152
~
i
A RE:30LUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 2101 gE GRAN7'ED
i
E WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified Petition for Verience
from JAMES D. CAOK, ET AL, 2202 South Oak, Santa Ana, California 92705, Oivner of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as
; Lot No 2, Block C of Txac't No. 1~3, per Miscellaneous Map Book 4, paqe 38.
~
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the Cily of Anaheim
on July 28, 1969, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given es required
by law and in acrnrdance with the provisions of the Meheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear end consider evi-
dence tor artd against seid proposed variance and tu invescigate und meke findings and recommendetions in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, and study medc by itself and in its behelf,
end after due wnsideretion of all evidence and reports offered at seid hearing, does find and detetmine the (ollowing
facts:
1. That the petitioner requests a varience from the Aneheim Municipal Code as follows, to estab] istt a
four-plex apartment complex on subject property:
a. SECTION 18,?8.050(2) - Minimum Buildinq site area
per dwellinq unit.
(2400 sauarc feet required; 1586 square feet
proposed).
b. SECTION 18.~8.050(4)
Maximum lot coveraqe. (45 by all structures
permitted; 4~ prapose~
c. SECTION 18,?8 050(6-b l) Minimum side vard setback.
13 feet proposed). ~14 feet required;
':1 '
(~ R ~
r ~
~~ ~ '
(`t
'~ i
~ ;
2. That there are exceptional or ex~raordinery circumstences or conditions appliceble to the property involved
ot to the intended use of the property that do not opply gene~al~y ~o ~e property or clnas of use in the same vicinity and
mne.
3• That the requested verience is neceseary for the preaervation end enjoymen2 oE e substantial property righl
poasessed by other prope:ty in the same vicinity and zone, end denied to the property in question.
4. Thet the requested variance wi11 not be muterially detrimentel to O~e public welfare or injurious to the prop-
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the properfy is located.
5. That properties one block west and further south on Zeyn Street are zoned R-3,
MULTIPLE FAMILY R 6iDENTIAL, ZONE: therefore, since subject property has commercial zoninq
to the east and H-3 zoning to the west, the Commission determined that the waivers under
1-a and 1-b would be elirtiinated if R-3 zoning were established. As a result, staff was
directed to initiate reclassification of all R-2 Zoned properties between La Palma Avenue
and North Street to the R-3 Zone.
V 1-G
-1-
. _.....,.
.
NOW, THEREFORE, E3E IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Pldnning Commission does hereby gr~nt subject
Petition for Varience, upon the following conditions which are hereby fcund to be a n~~cessnry p~erequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject properry in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Aneheirr~ a strip
of land 12.5 feet in width from the centerline of the alley, along the allr.•y, for v.~ide;iina
purposes.
2. That the owner{5) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of
15~ per front foot along Zeyn S treet, for tree planting purposes.
Street as requiredeby1theaCity Engineersandhinlaccorda~cedwith/standardsplanseand,specifica-
~ tions on file i~ the office cf the Cit En
4. That trash storage areas shall benprovided in accordance with approved plans on
file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
5. That any air-conditioning facilities prpposed shall be prop~rly shielded fror~
view, and the sound shall be buffered frou, adjacent residential homes.
6. That (;ondition fJos. I and 2, above me•itioned, shall be complied with prior to the
time that the Building Permit is issued or v,~ithin a period of 180 days from date hereof,
whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Commission or City Council may grant.
~. That Condition Nos. 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be cornplied vrith prior
to final building and zoning inspections.
8. That the ovrner(s) of subject property shall pay Lo the City of Anaheim park and
recreation fees of $75 per dwellina unit, as required by City Council Resolution, v~hich
shall be used for park and recreation pruposes, said amount to be paid at the time the
Buildirg Permit is issued.
9. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications on file v~ith the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Idos. 1, 2, and 3.
7'HE FOREGOiNG RESOLUTION is signed and appco ed by me this I 7th d~
of Au ust, 196U.
,,' \ l~
'~ 1~ .
CHAYRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~-2 ~-c-~' ~ _.~co_./
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNiNG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ~ ss,
CITY OF ANAHE[M ~
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Plnnning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certity that the fore-
going resolution wes pns,e,{ and ndopted at e mecting o( the City planning Commission o( the City of Anaheim, held on
July 28, 1969, trt 2:00 o'cluck P.M., by the following vote of the members thereo(:
AYES: COMMISSlONERS: Camp, Farano, Gauer, }{erbst, Thorn, Rowland
NOES: COMMi5SI0NERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISS[ONERS: A l lred
IN WITNESS WyEREUF, I have hereunto set my hand this 7th day of Augus t, 1964.
~~y % ~ ~ ;~~2~ l<.Ji "
SECRETARY ANAHEIh1 C1TY PLANNING COMM1SS10N
RESOLUTION NO. 162
'~ ` 1 V2-G
~ * ~
~ ~ I
~
f ~
` `_
7 • --- .
-Z-